re: If the US navy blew up this pipeline, is that an act of war?

quote:

---

So now we are from “floating” explosives to pushing or pulling them… all the while, the Russians who you think did it, that supply the gas line could just turn it off with out “floating, pulling, or pushing” explosives.. just doesn’t make sense.

And to cover my arse I have no idea who did it, just thinking the people selling the gas would rather shut it off before pushing, pulling, or floating explosives to blow up the pipe that supplies them with billions in revenue.

---

They weren't getting any revenue from either pipeline though, and they probably wouldn't have in the foreseeable future.

Are pipelines insured?

Yes

The marxist king of the CIA says Russia. The way that he sets it up to blame Russia says it all. Too many uneccesary small details makes a liar.

John Brennan blames Russia for blowing up their own pipeline and is itching for Putin to be replaced VIDEO CLIP

So we have our answer. If Brennan blames Russia the opposite is the truth.

This man should not be an expert on TV getting six figures; he should be in maximum security for 30 plus life.

Our country was infiltrated when he passed his security/background clearance on the second try-- after being a card-carrying communist.

Yes...it is!! Not only that, sanctions, financing and facilitating everything we have given them is also an act of war. People act like we aren't at war...we might not be physically, but in every other aspect we are picking up the tab. Wake up!!

Obviously it’s much more reasonable to believe the sabotage was conducted by Russia, even though it removes their single biggest bargaining chip which they have the ability to weaponize, and also have full leverage over from a resource standpoint.

It makes total sense for them to do this, knowing NATO presence in the Baltic could easily prove their involvement.

thanks for the heads up

and yes, I do know the difference - just wanted to make the point