Started By
Message

re: DOJ tells Judge no need for a special master. They've already reviewed Trump documents.

Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:13 pm to
Posted by oldskule
Down South
Member since Mar 2016
15494 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:13 pm to
Better pray a conservative never gets elected again!
Posted by Stidham8
Member since Aug 2018
7075 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:14 pm to
DOJ is on skates right now. Cannon is going to appoint the special master.
Posted by Prettyboy Floyd
Pensacola, Florida
Member since Dec 2013
15817 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

because he didn't declass them. he never did.


Again, out of your depth.

He absolutely did demand everything in his binder as well as all Russia docs / Clinton email server be declassified and even tried to work with the Justice Department to redact certain points in the documents. The Justice Department is not the ultimate decider of what is classified despite what you've been incorrectly and as Judge Amy Berman ruled in a court case that has never been appealed. The president is the absolute soul authority on classification.

Try and keep up

Simpleton

SUck that MAGA dick
Posted by Nightcore
Member since Aug 2022
12 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Tell me you don’t know who Sandy Berger is without telling me you don’t know who Sandy Berger is.


Berger took five copies of a one classified report, then pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material. He was fined $50,000, sentenced to two years of probation and 100 hours of community service.

but that was 2005, when moving classified material was a misdemeanor. in 2022, its a felony. because trump made it one.

Berger took one classified report.

trump took over 300, that we know of so far.

good luck with that.
Posted by Prettyboy Floyd
Pensacola, Florida
Member since Dec 2013
15817 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

trump took over 300, that we know of so far.


No, he took documents he declared declassified and as the ultimate authority on classification - you can SUCK his dick.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119187 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:19 pm to
I hope this Florida judge goes against the DOJ’s wishes and assigns an SM. The DOJ and media will scream constitutional crisis.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
15074 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

Berger took five copies of a one classified report, then pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material. He was fined $50,000, sentenced to two years of probation and 100 hours of community service.

but that was 2005, when moving classified material was a misdemeanor. in 2022, its a felony. because trump made it one.

Berger took one classified report.

trump took over 300, that we know of so far.

good luck with that.


Bless your heart.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

I hope this Florida judge goes against the DOJ’s wishes and assigns an SM (special master).
She will.
Posted by Bandit1980
God's Country
Member since Nov 2019
3789 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:22 pm to
Spoken like a true jackass Dem.


Your wife left you for a real man didn't she........
Posted by ElChapo
Caribbean
Member since Aug 2022
23 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:22 pm to
You are an embarrassment to our university!

You got run off from Texags back in the day because nobody could stand your arrogant looney stick……same shite here. You are rightly loath and laughed at here as well!!

Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56865 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

Nightcore


What brings you to this site?
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48806 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

2022, its a felony. because trump made it one.


Are you saying the President can single handedly change the criminal code?
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
19489 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

EVERY warrant has the potential to lead to privileged materials. That is WHY filter teams were developed.

Let’s say that the subject of a warrant is a suspected mobster. LEOs execute a warrant, but the docs do NOT go to the investigative team. They go to an UNRELATED filter team, to be SURE that the investigative team is NOT tainted by access to privileged materials.

This is standard, rote stuff. Y’all are just up-in-arms because it was Dear Leader who got hit with a warrant.

If it had been Rocco “Icepick” Margioletti or Chuy “Pistolero” Guerrero, it would not bother you in the slightest.

That makes perfect sense and why I asked the question. I didn't know the answer.
Posted by Cromulent
Down the Bayou
Member since Oct 2016
2824 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:26 pm to
Banking on getting him for the 20th time? Has to be exhausting. Why don’t you pull your head out of your arse and seek the truth.
Posted by Cromulent
Down the Bayou
Member since Oct 2016
2824 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:28 pm to
Yet here you are once again defending the criminals. Are you a troll or not? You act like a 15 year old on the SEC rant and then come here to talk down to people. What is it, Hank?
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48806 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

LEOs execute a warrant, but the docs do NOT go to the investigative team. They go to an UNRELATED filter team, to be SURE that the investigative team is NOT tainted by access to privileged materials.


So cute you believe that.

quote:

This is standard, rote stuff.


No it isn’t. You have never in your entire career experiences a “taint team”. This is in no way standard stuff. The legal community, except those with TDS (cough cough) are very outspoken against this. I mean even the extremely liberal ABA hates it.

quote:

If it had been Rocco “Icepick” Margioletti or Chuy “Pistolero” Guerrero, it would not bother you in the slightest.

Speak for yourself. Some people don’t determine justice based upon the defendant, like those of you with TDS
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
15074 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Are you saying the President can single handedly change the criminal code?


....but can't declassify a piece of paper.
Posted by MalletandScythe
Malibu, CA
Member since Mar 2021
66 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:30 pm to
I do. Every day.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119187 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

Are you saying the President can single handedly change the criminal code?


Trump violated Democrat Party Federal law.
Posted by Nightcore
Member since Aug 2022
12 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Again, you have no fking clue

You are simply out of your depth.


Amy Jacksons ruling

Let me know when you've done a little research and stop embarrassing yourself.
yeah thats been floating around for about a week. you really should go ahead and read the decision for yourself and not some summary from the trash arse Washington Times.

and when your done there go read the PRA, which you will apparently be shocked to discover has a very clear definition of "personal" and "Presidential" records, trump doesn't get to just make it up as he goes with whatever suits him.

we're the United States, we have rules.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram