Started By
Message

Is there a reasonable defense of not considering the Dollars Trilogy a “true trilogy”?

Posted on 8/19/22 at 10:09 pm
Posted by UndercoverBryologist
Member since Nov 2020
8077 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 10:09 pm
Yeah, yeah, it was not Leone’s “original intention,” but by any reasonable interpretation, he obviously intentionally made TGTB&TU a prequel by setting it earlier and having the Man With No Name gain his trademark wardrobe by the final act, solidifying it as cinema’s first origin story.


INB4 “he isn’t really the Man With No Name.” Yes, yes Joe, Manco, and Blondie. But these are all names given to him either by strangers or are otherwise obvious nicknames. It’s my contention that they’re all nicknames.
Posted by Me4Heisman
Landmass
Member since Aug 2004
5509 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 10:12 pm to
I was just thinking to myself that this board had stagnated recently. Thank you
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109967 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 10:19 pm to
The Man with No Name has different names in them.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
48485 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 10:49 pm to
Always thought “The Blood Money trilogy” sounded better. GBU has no dollars in the name anyway.
Posted by Master of Sinanju
Member since Feb 2012
11374 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 10:50 pm to
I don't know, but Lee Van Cleef used to confuse the hell out of me in these movies. I wondered how he could be so heroic in one movie, and so dastardly in the next. It never occurred to me that he played two different characters.
Posted by Boo Krewe
Member since Apr 2015
9810 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 11:17 pm to
hes not the same character
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35794 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 11:38 pm to
quote:

the Man With No Name


Mostly a promotional thing.

I mean, I always saw them as stand alone movies.

The Trilogy is that Clint is in them all I guess and mostly dresses the same. Its just a loose series, while Dirty Harry is EXACTLy the same character throughout the sequels.
This post was edited on 8/20/22 at 12:00 am
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
143037 posts
Posted on 8/20/22 at 12:01 am to
quote:

INB4 “he isn’t really the Man With No Name.” Yes, yes Joe, Manco, and Blondie. But these are all names given to him either by strangers or are otherwise obvious nicknames. It’s my contention that they’re all nicknames.
always been my view
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
143037 posts
Posted on 8/20/22 at 12:06 am to
FWIW Ford's "Cavalry Trilogy" was not intended as one either. Ford happened to get three films produced which concerned the cavalry.

Perhaps my fave of these: we all know John Wayne made The Shootist as his farewell to movies and his fans around the world.

Except he didn't. Per Ron Howard Wayne called him the next year to discuss his appearing in a film Wayne was setting up.
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
48769 posts
Posted on 8/20/22 at 2:20 am to
It all takes place in the same cinematic universe
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76778 posts
Posted on 8/20/22 at 3:18 am to
quote:

Blondie

This is a chick nickname. Also, his hair was not blonde.

Posted by Aeolian Vocalion
Texas
Member since Jul 2022
260 posts
Posted on 8/20/22 at 12:48 pm to
It's all too confusing for my brain.

I think I'll stick to Rod Cameron westerns.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57495 posts
Posted on 8/20/22 at 12:55 pm to
A few dollars more is tGOAT

#fightme
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram