- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: mob enters nursing home searching for Emmett Till accuser
Posted on 7/8/22 at 12:41 pm to oogabooga68
Posted on 7/8/22 at 12:41 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
Does it not bother you that the Media gave comparatively little coverage for Channon and Christophers' murder compared to St. George Floyd or St. Trayvon Martin?
Just happened to be at East Jefferson when CNN deigned to even bring it up.
But be assured that the national media had every intention of burying it forever.
Learned later that it was only because a small newspaper in Miami had reported on it and so as not to be scooped, CNN grudgingly covered it for as short a time as possible.
Then some others picked it up in a big show of "journalism."
As compared to George Floyd which was pounded into our living rooms every day for 6 months plus.
But what was done to those two, particularly to that helpless little white girl, which involved at least 24 straight hours of torture, is really too much to contemplate by any civilized person.
But should also be a message to those who actually believe they're buying peace for themselves and their progeny by pandering the LCD.
0
Posted on 7/8/22 at 12:42 pm to FooManChoo
quote:Yes it can. Government imposes force and order over mob rule. That's the invention and definition of government. Mob rule is what it reverts to when government fails in justice and order. Mob rule is what the government itself engages in when it begins to break down.
It can't happen when mob rule is the rule and the law.
quote:There are certainly particular governments I support doing away with altogether and particular periods of anarchic revolution/reformation I support. Seriously bro.
Serious question: do you support doing away with formal government altogether and instituting anarchy where the mob literally rules?
This post was edited on 7/8/22 at 12:43 pm
Posted on 7/8/22 at 12:47 pm to Gaggle
quote:Are you condemning the "mob rule" of a broken down government? If you are, you seem to be admitting that a functioning government is better than mob rule. Until the government stop functioning and/or until that government becomes tyrannical, then it is still preferable to mob rule, which is the lack of order and justice.
Yes it can. Government imposes force and order over mob rule. That's the invention and definition of government. Mob rule is what it reverts to when government fails in justice and order. Mob rule is what the government itself engages in when it begins to break down.
quote:You have spent this entire thread defending mob rule as far as I can tell. Mob rule is anarchy. If you support anarchy, you better hope it doesn't come for you.
There are certainly particular governments I support doing away with altogether and particular periods of anarchic revolution/reformation I support. Seriously bro.
Posted on 7/8/22 at 12:47 pm to Saint Alfonzo
quote:
This thread is fricking psychotic.
I agree.....a lot of ignorance and misunderstanding of the facts of the Emmett Till case and a lot of conflating of issues.
Posted on 7/8/22 at 12:53 pm to FooManChoo
quote:I'm glad you're finally talking sense. You're coming around to my first posts.
If you are, you seem to be admitting that a functioning government is better than mob rule. Until the government stop functioning and/or until that government becomes tyrannical, then it is still preferable to mob rule, which is the lack of order and justice.
quote:No you had a shock reaction to someone not toeing the line on lynching, but now you understand more why it happened. Go back and read.
You have spent this entire thread defending mob rule as far as I can tell.
quote:If you support corrupt/tyrannical government you better hope it doesn't come for you
Mob rule is anarchy. If you support anarchy, you better hope it doesn't come for you.
This post was edited on 7/8/22 at 12:53 pm
Posted on 7/8/22 at 1:01 pm to Gaggle
quote:
Yes it can. Government imposes force and order over mob rule.
Only when they disagree with the mob. They sure didn't go out of their way to stop American cities from burning in 2020, but we still have people locked up w/o bail for misdemeanors committed on January 6.
Posted on 7/8/22 at 1:10 pm to Rex Feral
quote:
Nah, string that bitch up.
quote:
Rex Feral
Name checks out.
Posted on 7/8/22 at 1:16 pm to deltaland
quote:
This stays here between us, but I heard he tried to suffocate her. His own mother
Shhh.
Philly Parisi got whacked for spreading that one.
Posted on 7/8/22 at 1:28 pm to VADawg
quote:
They're earning their street cred and wearing their badges of honor with light and cushy prison sentences. The appropriate punishment for them will never happen.
2 got life
1 got the death penalty it just takes a while to enact.
One got 35 years
Compare that to the murderers of Till.
Posted on 7/8/22 at 1:31 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Compare that to the murderers of Till.
1955. I do not care. It was a horrific thing that was done to him and all involved are worthless pieces of shite, but the murderers are dead now.
quote:
2 got life
1 got the death penalty it just takes a while to enact.
One got 35 years
You say this like it's bad to them. Ghetto black culture views prison time as a badge of honor. 35 years is a huge street cred boost. Also, clearly prison wasn't too bad for them the first time because they went back for more.
Posted on 7/8/22 at 1:32 pm to oogabooga68
1. It’s not some random whitey this Lady was involved.
2. It wasn’t a lunch mob and even the daily mail admits that after the shocker headline.
3. Go read Gaggle’s posts. Racism isn’t dying down.
2. It wasn’t a lunch mob and even the daily mail admits that after the shocker headline.
3. Go read Gaggle’s posts. Racism isn’t dying down.
Posted on 7/8/22 at 1:34 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Racism isn’t dying down
That's true. It just changed colors.
Posted on 7/8/22 at 1:39 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Racism isn’t dying down.
How can it when you people on the left use it as a tool every day?
Posted on 7/8/22 at 1:40 pm to SammyTiger
quote:It didn't exist at the time. In 1894 the word and concept did not exist. Every ethnicity on earth favored their own and it didn't occur to anyone this was bad.
3. Go read Gaggle’s posts. Racism isn’t dying down.
So they were just concerned with the rape and murder, they didn't think someone having naughty thoughts was the worse sin.
Posted on 7/8/22 at 1:44 pm to Gaggle
quote:
It didn't exist at the time. In 1894 the word and concept did not exist. Every ethnicity on earth favored their own and it didn't occur to anyone this was bad.
It existed. That’s dumb.
quote:
So they were just concerned with the rape and murder, they didn't think someone having naughty thoughts was the worse sin.
They were white supremacists. They were the ones murdering and having the “naughty thoughts”
Posted on 7/8/22 at 1:48 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Racism isn’t dying down.
You do know that when I cut you off in traffic the other day, it wasn't because of the color of your skin, but the content of your driving skills.
Posted on 7/8/22 at 1:50 pm to GamecockUltimate
He won’t reply. He got caught in a lie and knows it.
Posted on 7/8/22 at 1:50 pm to SammyTiger
No you don't start seeing the word until the 1930s. Get your archive subscriptions and search.
When Douglas accused Lincoln of wanting free and equal citizenship of blacks, Lincoln vehemently denied it and affirmed the notion that whites and blacks could never possibly exist equally. Lincoln was considered a radical, he wanted to escape controversy by proving he was "racist". Nowhere was that word spoken, there was zero controversy about anyone in any of the affairs being "racist", not being "racist" was considered absolutely ludicrous.
When Douglas accused Lincoln of wanting free and equal citizenship of blacks, Lincoln vehemently denied it and affirmed the notion that whites and blacks could never possibly exist equally. Lincoln was considered a radical, he wanted to escape controversy by proving he was "racist". Nowhere was that word spoken, there was zero controversy about anyone in any of the affairs being "racist", not being "racist" was considered absolutely ludicrous.
This post was edited on 7/8/22 at 1:52 pm
Posted on 7/8/22 at 1:54 pm to tigerfan84
She should have been in prison this entire time. The reality that she instigated a mob to lynch someone over nothing and got to live the rest of her life free is abhorrent. She should be thrown in jail for the rest of her life and if a mob lynched her at this point I sure as shite won't feel bad for her.
Posted on 7/8/22 at 1:56 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
They were white supremacists. They were the ones murdering and having the “naughty thoughts”
I love reading shite like this. Are black people who have been terrorizing every other ethnicity (go look at the actual interracial violent crime statistics in this country) ‘black supremacist’? The absurdity of the interracial violent crime statistics are so lopsided one group literally has a monopoly on it against every other group more than the reverse in a ridiculously disproportionate amount. Where do you stand on all that black supremacist violent crime? Tell us.
Page 10 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News