- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
SCOTUS rules in favor of WV over the EPA... What does this mean for the ATF?
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:58 am
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:58 am
What the Poliboard is telling me is that this ruling:
I specifically asked about pistol braces and the new point system, and it appears that there won't be any weight how it can be enforced. Take it with a grain of salt until we see how it plays out I guess.
LINK
quote:
Removed the ability for bureaucratic agencies to create de facto legislation
I specifically asked about pistol braces and the new point system, and it appears that there won't be any weight how it can be enforced. Take it with a grain of salt until we see how it plays out I guess.
LINK
Posted on 6/30/22 at 10:18 am to finchmeister08
Not sure what it means for ATF but can we bring back 2 stroke outboards now? Will I still be able to buy a truck with a big ole V-8 in 10 years? It sure opens up a lot of questions and will make Congress possibly have to do something other than show trials.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 10:21 am to finchmeister08
I think the problem here is, Congress actually defined them in the act. So, we don't have an agency making law to the extent they are defined. As far as SBRs are concerned anyway. Did the act address braces or is that purely ATF?
Posted on 6/30/22 at 10:28 am to finchmeister08
They didn't cite Chevron in the opinion so I don't think this totally overrules it
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News