- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What Are Your Arguments Against Bill Barr’s Determination The Evidence Was Not Fraudulent?
Posted on 6/24/22 at 6:51 am to Bass Tiger
Posted on 6/24/22 at 6:51 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
t appears Sulu didn’t want to respond to the facts……they never do. Lol!
OK I’ll bite - if any of this is true, where is the objective evidence?
How could Barr openly ignore it?
Where is John Kennedy?
Where is Mitch McConnell?
Posted on 6/24/22 at 7:30 am to Sulu
If you want people to trust the system, you need to fix it first.
![](https://i.postimg.cc/0NtxscWw/SA-accept-election.png)
![](https://i.postimg.cc/0NtxscWw/SA-accept-election.png)
Posted on 6/24/22 at 7:38 am to Sulu
quote:
OK I’ll bite - if any of this is true, where is the objective evidence?
This is just a restatement of your original post. “But if it’s true, why don’t I believe it?”
Posted on 6/24/22 at 8:12 am to Sulu
quote:Barr disagreed with pursuit of a stolen election from the getgo.
How could Barr openly ignore it?
Let's repeat that, Barr disagreed with pursuit of a stolen election from the getgo.
You reference Barr's ""Investigation"". Barr's method of investigation would be to send the DOJ's investigative arm out to take a look. The DOJ's investigative arm is referred to as the FBI Soooo....
How many precincts did the FBI investigate?
That answer would be "zero".
THERE WAS NO INVESTIGATION! NONE! ZIP! NADA!
Why?
Because in Barr's warped reasoning, the ramifications of a full-on federal investigation were simply too ugly and too severe regardless of outcome. So it was/is better, in Barr's capitulatory calculations, to pretend/assume/hope things were on the up-and-up.
What Barr (and you) fail to comprehend is without that ugly, horrible, terrible, nasty, unsettling investigation, there will never be a perception of truth in an outcome claiming PotatoBrain garnered 81 million votes, and that is dangerous.
Here's the caveat: A democracy can survive corrupt elections if its society doesn't perceive them as corrupt. A democracy cannot survive if there is widespread perception of electoral corruption ... even if corruption is in fact not widespread.
...
Now we have a hand-picked Kangaroo Court comprised entirely of rabid, mouth-foaming, spittle generating, Anti-Trump Extremists summoning only the witnesses they are certain will bolster their pathological anti-Trump narrative in a made-for-TV infomercial.
Have you asked yourself why?
Why, if the evidence was clear, would a Kangaroo Court stacked 100% with Anti-Trump monkeys be required?
The answer is, it wouldn't be.
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)