- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Russia warns NATO-member Lithuania
Posted on 6/20/22 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 6/20/22 at 2:51 pm
quote:
Russia warned NATO member Lithuania on Monday that unless the transit of goods to Russia's Kaliningrad exclave on the Baltic Sea was swiftly restored then Moscow would take undisclosed measures to defend its national interests.
With east-west relations at a half-century low over Russia's Feb. 24 invasion of Ukraine, Vilnius banned the transit of goods sanctioned by the European Union through Lithuanian territory to and from the exclave, citing EU sanction rules.
Russia's foreign ministry summoned Lithuania's top envoy in Moscow to deliver a protest while the Kremlin said the situation was beyond serious.
"The situation is more than serious," Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters. "This decision is really unprecedented. It's a violation of everything."
Russia's foreign ministry demanded Vilnius reverse what it cast as an "openly hostile" move immediately.
LINK
Posted on 6/20/22 at 3:03 pm to JinFL
Would be a bad move for Russia to mess w a NATO member.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 3:05 pm to JinFL
Russia begging to get a nuke in their pussy.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 3:07 pm to JinFL
I was told the sanctions were working -- I mean working to do something other than bankrupt Americans.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 3:08 pm to JinFL
NATO would sell out the Baltics.
Brandon sure the frick would.
Brandon sure the frick would.
This post was edited on 6/20/22 at 3:23 pm
Posted on 6/20/22 at 3:09 pm to BayouBlitz
An embargo is an act of war. How about Lithuania not unilaterally abrogate a treaty and put NATO in a crap situation.
Article V shouldn't mean little piss ant countries pick fights that brings the whole crew to the brawl.
Article V shouldn't mean little piss ant countries pick fights that brings the whole crew to the brawl.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 3:09 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
Would be a bad move for Russia to mess w a NATO member.
And where is the EU going to get their energy from?
Posted on 6/20/22 at 3:11 pm to thermal9221
NATO will launch a nuclear attack if Russia retaliates against Lithuania?
Posted on 6/20/22 at 3:17 pm to JinFL
And now UK's top general is telling his soldiers to prepare for a land war in Europe.
Daily Mail
quote:
Prepare to fight and beat Russia in a Third World War, Britain's top general warns: New UK Army commander tells troops to brace for European land war in tub-thumping message as tyrant Putin menaces ex-Soviet states
Daily Mail
Posted on 6/20/22 at 3:17 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
And now UK's top general is telling his soldiers to prepare for a land war in Europe.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 3:21 pm to DawgRebelinAL
quote:
An embargo is an act of war.
Wrong. Blockades are an act of war. Embargoes are decidedly not.
quote:
How about Lithuania not unilaterally abrogate a treaty and put NATO in a crap situation.
This is an EU sanction.
quote:
Article V
Not a concern. Russia isn't going to do shite to Lithuania.
This post was edited on 6/20/22 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 6/20/22 at 3:22 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
And now UK's top general is telling his soldiers to prepare for a land war in Europe.
How is that any different than what all Western militaries have been preparing for since the 1870's?
Posted on 6/20/22 at 3:29 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
Would be a bad move for Russia to mess w a NATO member.
For the world. You do know that Russia has over 2,000 nuclear, MIRV tipped ballistic missiles that can hit any city in the US in less than 30 minutes from launch, right?
This post was edited on 6/20/22 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 6/20/22 at 3:31 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
Would be a bad move for Russia to mess w a NATO member.
Yeah, Biden and the EU might send him a very strongly worded letter.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 3:32 pm to GhostOfFreedom
quote:
You do know that Russia has over 2,000 ballistic missiles that can hit any city in the US in less than 30 minutes from launch, right?
The US is similarly situated. Two other NATO members also have nukes, and three others have agreements to carry/launch US nukes should the need arise.
Guess what? None of them are going to use them.
Russia is not going to nuclear war over Lithuanian rail cargo embargoes. It is not in their interest, and never will be.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 3:34 pm to JinFL
The irony though.
Russia is holding up grain shipments amongst other things.
Reap wat ya sow Ruskies
Russia is holding up grain shipments amongst other things.
Reap wat ya sow Ruskies
Posted on 6/20/22 at 3:37 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
And where is the EU going to get their energy from?
If only someone would have told certain EU members it might not be a great idea to be so reliant on Russia for their energy needs. Well, live and learn I suppose
Posted on 6/20/22 at 3:40 pm to Indefatigable
You are right. Blockades are an act of war and I used the incorrect noun. Preventing Russia from overland supply in contravention of a treaty is arguably a blockade.
Starving 500,000 Russians definitely could be construed as such.
Starving 500,000 Russians definitely could be construed as such.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 3:42 pm to GhostOfFreedom
quote:
For the world. You do know that Russia has over 2,000 nuclear, MIRV tipped ballistic missiles that can hit any city in the US in less than 30 minutes from launch, right?
"Yeah, and? At least we get to nuke Rusisa! frick yeah!"
- Mindless, filthy war mongers
Popular
Back to top

16










