Started By
Message

re: Trump Doctrine 2.0: Former president lays out plan to reverse Biden agenda

Posted on 3/30/22 at 11:58 am to
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
31803 posts
Posted on 3/30/22 at 11:58 am to
quote:

His vision for America is better than most half his age.


while i agree with much of his vision stop with this stupid shite below

quote:

Don’t fall into the trap of thinking that our elders are useless because they are elderly. There is a lot of experience and context that older people have that younger people don’t.


sorry but the top 3 ranking officials in the country shouldnt be 75 plus. thats bullshite and its typical fricking boomers not being willing to reliquish power.

Im not some young guy, im 40 so not like im saying this without life expierence.

sorry but if you are too old to work in the private sector, you are not fit to lead.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
31803 posts
Posted on 3/30/22 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

That's fkn bullshite. Obama spent more than every president before him combined. T


im talking about the covid spending and why current inflation is happening. he should have vetoed both like he wanted to. I know he just went along with it kicking and screaming but he should have said frick no.

the fact that so many on this board wanted the initial covid spending bill shows how much so many on here flip flop back in fourth and are not principled conservatives they claim to be.
Posted by Bulldogblitz
In my house
Member since Dec 2018
26868 posts
Posted on 3/30/22 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

to reverse Biden agenda


how can anyone unpoop their diaper?
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
53082 posts
Posted on 3/30/22 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

May want to go back and look at the lockdown orders. There is a reason there are 50 States, and there seemed to be 20 different variations of lockdowns. If the orders came from the Federal level, in addition to being unconstitutional, they would have been similar across the board.



Yeah but then that would require the poster to be intelligent. Why be intelligent, when you can be lazy and stupid?
Posted by samson73103
Krypton
Member since Nov 2008
8257 posts
Posted on 3/30/22 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

Are our leaders just stupid, or weak?

Yes. And yes.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
31803 posts
Posted on 3/30/22 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

May want to go back and look at the lockdown orders. There is a reason there are 50 States, and there seemed to be 20 different variations of lockdowns. If the orders came from the Federal level, in addition to being unconstitutional, they would have been similar across the board.


yep and for the record i know he didnt lock down the country but he did give fauci a stage and let him influence things.

Trump is great when he sticks to his guy. he has amazing instincts and is almost always right when he sticks to that. its when he lets the others influence him he has issues.

perfect example....his gut told him it was a bad idea and that he should have stopped fauci but he trusted his advisors. He has said as such.

one thing you have to give Trump credit for is his vision on what hte country should be and his instincts. He almost always lands on the right side of things when he does that.

with all that said, he is still too old, but i will vote for him if he is nominee but i would prefer Desantis or Rand.
Posted by slowmoe
Member since Mar 2022
600 posts
Posted on 3/30/22 at 12:08 pm to
Why don't you move to another country if you hate old people so much?
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
31803 posts
Posted on 3/30/22 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

Why don't you move to another country if you hate old people so much?


did i say anything about hating old people?

how the frick do you get that from.....75-80 years who are not fit to work in the private sector are not fit to be the leaders of the free world?


so you think its ok that the current president, speaker and leader of the senate are all over 70 with the speaker and president being 80? frick that
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41868 posts
Posted on 3/30/22 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

sorry but the top 3 ranking officials in the country shouldnt be 75 plus. thats bull shite and its typical fricking boomers not being willing to relinquish power.
How many Millenials are willingly only serving for one or two terms in the House or Senate? This isn't a "boomer" issue, but a problem with humanity. Those who get power (no matter what their age) don't usually want to let go of it.

quote:

sorry but if you are too old to work in the private sector, you are not fit to lead.
Why is a person "too old" to work in the private sector or in government? Is it due to physical limitations or cognitive ones? I'd agree with you that if there are limitations due to age that prevent a person from doing their job effectively, they shouldn't be doing that job any longer, but being "old" isn't a disqualifier by itself (not to mention that the definition of "too old" is subjective and open to interpretation by itself)

AOC isn't "better" than Nancy Pelosi just because she's younger. I'd love for Nancy to leave office, but it's due to her views, not due to her age. I wouldn't like AOC taking her spot any better just because she's young.

Term limits may be a good thing, but not because our current politicians are "old", but because they've been entrenched in D.C.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
31803 posts
Posted on 3/30/22 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

How many Millenials are willingly only serving for one or two terms in the House or Senate? This isn't a "boomer" issue, but a problem with humanity. Those who get power (no matter what their age) don't usually want to let go of it.



agree 100% and more my issue

quote:

Why is a person "too old" to work in the private sector or in government? Is it due to physical limitations or cognitive ones? I'd agree with you that if there are limitations due to age that prevent a person from doing their job effectively, they shouldn't be doing that job any longer, but being "old" isn't a disqualifier by itself (not to mention that the definition of "too old" is subjective and open to interpretation by itself)


cognitive but also at some point you lose touch with most of the population also. 75 is too damn old for sure.

quote:

AOC isn't "better" than Nancy Pelosi just because she's younger. I'd love for Nancy to leave office, but it's due to her views, not due to her age. I wouldn't like AOC taking her spot any better just because she's young.


agree 10000%

quote:

Term limits may be a good thing, but not because our current politicians are "old", but because they've been entrenched in D.C.


term limits are 100% a great thing and should have been enacted decades ago.

Posted by TigerFan55555
Tomball, TX
Member since Nov 2008
9605 posts
Posted on 3/30/22 at 1:45 pm to
if he can remove 20 million illegal immigrants (and the children they had here illegally) the economy would boom right after a 6 month correction... wages would sky rocket along with way less spending and more taxpayers.. it would be the equivalent of the 50s baby boom.. we would have a budget surplus in two years... cut foreign aid and build shite here... make it to where illegals cant attend public schools, make it hard for them to stay and they will go back on there own... for someone thats been here 20 years need to work out some system where they can stay they just cant vote... someone thats been here 15-20 years this is there home now..
Posted by BurntOrangeMan
Dallas TX
Member since May 2021
5628 posts
Posted on 3/30/22 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

So, what's the plan?


English mother fricker, can you read it?
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
43150 posts
Posted on 3/30/22 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

why == would anyone want a 75+ year old to be elected again

As opposed to Biden, Harris, Buttigeig, Austin, Blinken, Schumer, Pelosi, Swallwell, Waters, Cuomo, etc, etc etc. - name one better than Trump even if he were 80.
Posted by dr
texas
Member since Mar 2022
1132 posts
Posted on 3/30/22 at 2:15 pm to
correct

this is very likely exactly what is happening
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
43150 posts
Posted on 3/30/22 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

not because our current politicians are "old", but because they've been entrenched in D.C.
====
term limits are 100% a great thing and should have been enacted decades ago

Agreed -

I think there should be some requirement for private experience in having at least had a job with a non-government business.

NOBODY should be entrusted with governmental responsibility whose ONLY experience is in operating the government - that only begets government for the sake of government - making it like a monopoly game.

Perhaps it is not age itself that should be limited - but put a limit on how many years you can "serve" - then you have to go back and live in the system you helped create. These corrupt critters up there now NEVER have to suffer the consequences of the laws they pass.
Posted by RBTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
7803 posts
Posted on 3/30/22 at 2:33 pm to
Uninformed idiot sheep. Everybody that voted Biden owes me gas money

Russia and China licking their chops seeing a feeble Amerika where Oscar award child grooming agenda moves on state run TV.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
61783 posts
Posted on 3/30/22 at 2:46 pm to
You should be able to show your voter registration card at the pump and only pay $1.75 if you're not a registered Dem.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41868 posts
Posted on 3/30/22 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

cognitive but also at some point you lose touch with most of the population also. 75 is too damn old for sure.
As I said, if someone cannot do their job due to cognitive issues, they shouldn't be doing it any longer. That's as true for 35 year-olds as it is for 75 year-olds.

I know a few 75+ year-olds who are in great physical and mental shape and have wisdom enough to be great leaders at that age. I don't think it's wise to pick an arbitrary age like 75 and make it a limit when older leaders can have a lot to offer.

quote:

term limits are 100% a great thing and should have been enacted decades ago.
Maybe, but term limits also limit the effectiveness of great leaders being able to lead.

I'm generally in support of term limits, by the way, I just think we need to think critically about the cause of our problems rather than chalk them up to generalizations like "our leaders are too old".
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram