- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Biden Pledged To Only Consider Black Females for Supreme Court Pick
Posted on 1/26/22 at 2:39 pm
Posted on 1/26/22 at 2:39 pm
Jen Psaki just reaffirmed that the President will only consider a black woman for the next nomination -- a threshold gender and race condition that the Court itself has found unconstitutional for schools and unlawful for private businesses.
Jonathan Turley
In his debate with Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden made two pledges to voters and asked his opponent to do the same to nominate only a black woman for the next open Supreme Court seat and to choose a woman as his vice president. Even with identity politics, the pledge to impose a gender and race requirement for the next Supreme Court nominee is as ironic as it is troubling. What Biden was declaring, and what Sanders wisely avoided, would effectively constitute discrimination in admission to the Supreme Court. Indeed, the Supreme Court has declared that such race or gender conditions are strictly unconstitutional for admission to public colleges.
The pledges that Biden has made amount to this. No matter how qualified men or, in the case of the Supreme Court, women who are not black may be, he will not consider them as candidates. In the case of vice president, such gender discrimination would be allowed, as presidential candidates can select a running mate on any grounds and voters can decide if they approve. Justices, however, are lifetime appointees, and presidents have always been careful to state that, while they seek diversity among their nominees, they would appoint the most qualified person regardless of race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. But in a single declaration, Biden quickly dispensed with even the pretense of equal consideration.
Jonathan Turley
In his debate with Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden made two pledges to voters and asked his opponent to do the same to nominate only a black woman for the next open Supreme Court seat and to choose a woman as his vice president. Even with identity politics, the pledge to impose a gender and race requirement for the next Supreme Court nominee is as ironic as it is troubling. What Biden was declaring, and what Sanders wisely avoided, would effectively constitute discrimination in admission to the Supreme Court. Indeed, the Supreme Court has declared that such race or gender conditions are strictly unconstitutional for admission to public colleges.
The pledges that Biden has made amount to this. No matter how qualified men or, in the case of the Supreme Court, women who are not black may be, he will not consider them as candidates. In the case of vice president, such gender discrimination would be allowed, as presidential candidates can select a running mate on any grounds and voters can decide if they approve. Justices, however, are lifetime appointees, and presidents have always been careful to state that, while they seek diversity among their nominees, they would appoint the most qualified person regardless of race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. But in a single declaration, Biden quickly dispensed with even the pretense of equal consideration.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 2:42 pm to MrLSU
How is this not just as racist as saying he refuses to consider black women for the position at all? 
Posted on 1/26/22 at 2:42 pm to MrLSU
Yea, I understand the moron shot his mouth off in order to get elected, but he cannot publicly support someone solely based on race and sex.
He'll have to consider a wide range of justices.
He'll have to consider a wide range of justices.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 2:42 pm to MrLSU
Racist but that only means that like 5% of the population to pull from? Can't wait to see what shite floats to the top of this list.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 2:42 pm to MrLSU
Because naturally that is the best person for the job.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 2:43 pm to MrLSU
I want Kamala. She can do less damage there.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 2:46 pm to PorkSammich
quote:
Here’s a black bitch:
Ironically, Biden cannot consider that bitch's spouse for lacking the gender qualification.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 2:46 pm to MrLSU
Let's see if Sleepy's handlers remember their pandering strategy.
Judging someone on the color of their skin, not the content of their character?
:BoldStrategyCotton.gif:
Judging someone on the color of their skin, not the content of their character?
:BoldStrategyCotton.gif:
Posted on 1/26/22 at 2:46 pm to MrLSU
he also said he had a cure for cancer, and had a plan to quickly cure covid
he has never lived up to anything he ever promised besides being corrupt and for sale to the highest bidder
he will read whatever is on the teleprompter and wont have a clue who he is talking about or what he is talking about
he has never lived up to anything he ever promised besides being corrupt and for sale to the highest bidder
he will read whatever is on the teleprompter and wont have a clue who he is talking about or what he is talking about
Posted on 1/26/22 at 2:50 pm to MrLSU
And, after they're on the Court, when we say that the only reason that they're on the Court is because they're a black female, we'll be called racist misogynist and leftist will assure everyone that this black woman was the most qualified in the world.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 2:53 pm to MrLSU
Racist pieces of shite.
2022.. and Democrats still revolve everything around skintone and gender. They've not changed in almost 200 years.
frickin relying solely on skintone and gender to select a supreme court justice.
2022.. and Democrats still revolve everything around skintone and gender. They've not changed in almost 200 years.
frickin relying solely on skintone and gender to select a supreme court justice.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 2:56 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
Yea, I understand the moron shot his mouth off in order to get elected, but he cannot publicly support someone solely based on race and sex.
He'll have to consider a wide range of justices.
Nah. Biden and his leftist hen handlers aren't that smart and they are fully consumed with ideology over merit.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 2:57 pm to MrLSU
Biden is going to fill the gap with Stacy Abrams.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 2:58 pm to Plx1776
quote:
Racist pieces of shite.
2022.. and Democrats still revolve everything around skintone and gender. They've not changed in almost 200 years.
frickin relying solely on skintone and gender to select a supreme court justice.
He'll also select someone who is an ideological SJW who is to dumb to know better.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 3:01 pm to hogcard1964
quote:No he won't. They will have a few names of non minority females, but those are just for show.
but he cannot publicly support someone solely based on race and sex.
He'll have to consider a wide range of justices
Posted on 1/26/22 at 3:02 pm to Bamafan24
quote:
Racist but that only means that like 5% of the population to pull from? Can't wait to see what shite floats to the top of this list.
Less than that.
Posted on 1/26/22 at 3:07 pm to MrLSU
Just imagine if Trump had come out and said "my qualification is they have to be a white woman."
Popular
Back to top

37









