- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Per a peer-reviewed study, "Horse paste" (Ivermectin) reduced CV19 mortality rate by 70%
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:46 am to stout
Posted on 1/19/22 at 8:46 am to stout
For fricks sake. At least pull data from an actual Journal. This is just a pay to publish bullshite.
You know the journal is garbage when they have this statement.
You know the journal is garbage when they have this statement.
quote:
Cureus does not consider impact factor to be a reliable or useful metric of individual article importance. Cureus is a signer of DORA – the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment – and does not promote the use of journal impact factors. We instead use article-level metrics such as reads, downloads and citations. Cureus also encourages all readers to submit an SIQ (Scholarly Impact Quotient) score for each article. SIQ is our unique post-publication peer review system that assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. The following stats are from the prior six months. Averages are displayed for monthly reads, submission to publication time, and accepted articles published for free.
4
Posted on 1/19/22 at 9:07 am to nerd guy
quote:
We instead use article-level metrics such as reads, downloads and citations. Cureus also encourages all readers to submit an SIQ (Scholarly Impact Quotient) score for each article. SIQ is our unique post-publication peer review system that assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large.
Are we to glean from this quote that the journal judges the quality of articles not by validation or peer review, but from the number of clicks and shares and positive reviews on the internet? Is that what this means?
Posted on 1/19/22 at 9:33 am to nerd guy
quote:They don't know better.
For fricks sake. At least pull data from an actual Journal. This is just a pay to publish bullshite
Posted on 1/19/22 at 9:49 am to nerd guy
"For fricks sake. At least pull data from an actual Journal. This is just a pay to publish bull shite.
You know the journal is garbage when they have this statement. "
Exactly
You know the journal is garbage when they have this statement. "
Exactly
Posted on 1/19/22 at 3:23 pm to nerd guy
I searched "is cureus peer reviewed"
Everything returned that they are, in fact, a peer reviewed and respected journal.
I don't trust the science, because I trust "the science"
Everything returned that they are, in fact, a peer reviewed and respected journal.
I don't trust the science, because I trust "the science"
This post was edited on 1/19/22 at 3:24 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News