Started By
Message
locked post

Does it not seem like a third party much more centric could come in and take over?

Posted on 9/13/23 at 9:32 pm
Posted by Tvilletiger
PVB
Member since Oct 2015
5734 posts
Posted on 9/13/23 at 9:32 pm
Seems like there are a bunch on the far right a bunch of the far left then a bunch of people that are just sick of all the politics and would just fall in line somewhere down the middle?
Posted by G The Tiger Fan
Member since Apr 2015
110170 posts
Posted on 9/13/23 at 9:33 pm to
A third party has zero chance.
Posted by TommyTiger91
Member since Sep 2023
106 posts
Posted on 9/13/23 at 9:36 pm to
No a third party that says we’re gonna form a militia could take over…and hopefully that does happen one day

It’s our right and our duty to get rid of a government that’s become this destructive
This post was edited on 9/13/23 at 9:39 pm
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
37279 posts
Posted on 9/13/23 at 9:36 pm to
Maybe not this year result-wise, but it’s the first time in my life I’ve felt there could be real traction for it

People are fed up and disgusted by both parties representatives currently
Posted by faraway
Member since Nov 2022
3235 posts
Posted on 9/13/23 at 9:36 pm to
it's a uniparty. doesn't matter how many you label. you have not begun to understand until you understand it's a uniparty and they're all puppets absolutely 100%
Posted by Tandemjay
Member since Jun 2022
4006 posts
Posted on 9/13/23 at 11:07 pm to
We don't need a third party, we need a second party to displace the uni-party.
Posted by Bama Bird
Member since Dec 2011
Member since Mar 2013
21784 posts
Posted on 9/13/23 at 11:21 pm to
Tbh I think Joe Manchin would pull significant numbers as an Indy, maybe even winning a few states
Posted by Walt OReilly
Poplarville, MS
Member since Oct 2005
124694 posts
Posted on 9/13/23 at 11:25 pm to
Biden boy having second thoughts about his vote

Imagine that
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
17185 posts
Posted on 9/13/23 at 11:36 pm to
If money didn’t dominate politics, maybe.
Posted by stuntman
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
9804 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 12:01 am to
quote:

centric


What does this actually mean? Like, in terms of policy, what are some "centric" ideas?

Whenever I hear that word in the context of government, I tend to think of it as just more spending and government control.

If people were actually sick of what government has become, the libertarian party would have 100 million members by now.

Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
22594 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 12:01 am to
A centrist party? What does that even look like?

Gutless nice people?
Posted by 2020_reVISION
Richmond,VA
Member since Dec 2020
3269 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 12:06 am to
The two-party paradigm won't allow it.
Posted by Figgy
CenCal
Member since May 2020
8864 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 12:42 am to
They’d get slaughtered and the remaining republicans would too. The dems would never ever split themselves up as they’re in lockstep. Welcome to dem domination.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
20943 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 1:37 am to
The country is ripe for a 3rd party or an "independent" mass of voters. The problem is that most people are simply too scared to take that step.

What does this look like?
Well, it is chiefly a rebellion against incumbents.

There are still people that consider hot button items like abortion to be primary in their politics. But they are dwindling in number.

As an example, in the past it would be unfathomable to me that anyone on the left would immediately come out against the New Mexico governor, regarding her abolition of the 2nd Amendment via executive action. However, I've seen people on the left come out and say "you can't do that". This was all brought on by covid, as they saw the overreach and how their fellow Democrats didn't actually care about civil rights. This was a shock to the system for these people.

Same has happened to people on the right regarding the 1st, 4th, 5th, and 6th amendments, after seeing the government weaponized due to the Patriot Act and against speech through its relationship with Big Tech.

The current weaponization of government is transparent to all but the very few that refuse to open their eyes.

We'd better get onboard with this idea for the 2024 election and pick candidates accordingly. If we don't, and if we get it wrong in 2024, the nation is over and it's going to get extremely ugly for all of us.

Democrats are saying their intentions out loud - abolish the 2nd Amendment, jail opponents, censor speech etc, while globalists want the 15 minute cities, EV's for everyone, 'own nothing and like it', take zee vaccine and eat zee bugs, all while Republicans like McCarthy roll over. Imagine giving these people a green light to continue. It won't be talk after 2024, it'll be implementation.

Many of you have kids, and yet you would rather cling to party voting knowing it's all the same party, knowing it will doom your children and grandchildren to a life of servitude, rather than take this step and vow to rid ourselves of the uni-party.

You need to reach down and grab a pair. If not you then who, and if not now, when? There comes a time when it's too late - and that time will be right after the election in 2024. If we let this slip too far, we all know what the only remaining path to freedom looks like, and it's bloody and violent. We absolutely must avoid this. They cannot cheat in sufficient numbers if the entire electorate rebels against them at the ballot box.

If things go too far, people will ask questions, like, "How did you vote?" You're going to say: "Well, I didn't want to vote against the uni-party because I thought I was wasting my vote." You might think it sounds reasonable right now. But later, it won't be viewed that way. You may as well say, "I was a giant fricking pussy and I'm one of the many people responsible for this shithole existence we are in now, because I didn't have the guts to do something as easy as shunning the uni-party at the ballot box.", because that's how everyone is going to look at you. All the things you say about California voters are the same things people will say about you, and it'll be true, unless you change. If you don't change, the system damn sure won't change. Why would it? You reward it with your vote.
Posted by Jasharts77
Knoxville
Member since Nov 2019
829 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 3:00 am to
The unity party will not allow it
Posted by tango029
Member since Dec 2022
531 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 4:43 am to
It's extremely difficult to get a third party started due to how we vote. Since our voting requires in most cases only a plurality for victory, many people fear wasting their vote and causing someone worse to be elected.

If more states start adopting the ranked choice voting like Alaska we could see it (at least outside the presidency). In a ranked choice system a voter can put their vote to their desired candidate, but if eliminated fall back to a less desired but preferred candidate. Basically it allows people to vote freely without wasting their vote and it shows people general level of support for third parties.

The only way a third party president becomes viable is to drop the electoral college and go to a ranked choice or runoff system.

Currently if a true third party gets involved in the presidential election, the 270 electoral tally will never be reached, resulting in partisan state legislatures being the folks who decide the president.
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
9141 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 5:07 am to
You would think so. But as soon as a candidate would give their opinions against whichever topic the established Left or Right hold dear, you will see fear mongering from the MSM blasting that candidate.

Freedom and Liberty are hard.

The easy road is staying in the cage with invisible bars.

You can pose a question of "Do you think the value of your dollar has gone down?" to both Dems and Reps and both will tell you absolutely. If you ask who's fault is it? You will likely get Rs or Ds or Biden or Trump, basically whoever they are politically opposed to. It really is the system and the control from the center (DC) that keeps us going down the path of enriching the politicians and their donors.
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
60804 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 5:35 am to
This is a game of tug of war where the left is winning. All a centric party would do is give the left more momentum.


Let’s examine how this goes at present. Left goes farther left and right goes more center to get things accomplished, and the center line moves further left. Wash and repeat because the right is always the one who’s expected to move to center, NEVER THE LEFT, and so the line for what is the center position is forever moving further left, which is why what once was left is now center.

All a centric party would do is move it faster to the left. What we need is staunch and immovable principled opposition that changes the narratives, and holds the left’s feet to the fire.




This post was edited on 9/14/23 at 5:37 am
Posted by FLTech
the A
Member since Sep 2017
21202 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 5:54 am to
Ummm hello? Does Trump ring a bell?
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
33582 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 6:07 am to
quote:

far right


I know what far left is, but what is far right? I thought I knew what it means. But if there are a bunch (as in say close to a third) of people in it, then I guess I don’t.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram