- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Political debates: No longer needed?
Posted on 8/20/23 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 8/20/23 at 6:07 pm
Go on record.
In regards to political debates to run for any office
A) Don’t need them anymore
B) You shouldn’t run for office if you refuse to debate
C) only my candidate shouldn’t have to debate
In regards to political debates to run for any office
A) Don’t need them anymore
B) You shouldn’t run for office if you refuse to debate
C) only my candidate shouldn’t have to debate
Posted on 8/20/23 at 6:09 pm to BugAC
It’s funny watching you guys pretend to have discussions on topics when everyone knows all your positions are simply whatever is opposite of or hurts Trump.
Posted on 8/20/23 at 6:09 pm to BugAC
quote:
Go on record.
You gonna seriously hold me accountable later? You’re such a joke of a bot

Posted on 8/20/23 at 6:09 pm to Madking
quote:
Madking
I take it your answer is C?
Posted on 8/20/23 at 6:10 pm to BugAC
D) All of your options suck, and debates still have utility in competitive races or those with unknown candidates.
Posted on 8/20/23 at 6:10 pm to BugAC
B
It’s a public office. The voters absolutely deserve to see the candidates engage with each other. It doesn’t have to be legacy media by any means but it’s bullshite if you don’t have the stones to stand with your opponents.
It’s a public office. The voters absolutely deserve to see the candidates engage with each other. It doesn’t have to be legacy media by any means but it’s bullshite if you don’t have the stones to stand with your opponents.
This post was edited on 8/20/23 at 6:17 pm
Posted on 8/20/23 at 6:10 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
You gonna seriously hold me accountable later? You’re such a joke of a bot
Imagine being this cowardly you can’t even answer this question.
Posted on 8/20/23 at 6:10 pm to BugAC
Go ahead, keep proving my point.
Posted on 8/20/23 at 6:11 pm to Houag80
quote:
This is really sad.
This forum in general is sad
This post was edited on 8/20/23 at 6:12 pm
Posted on 8/20/23 at 6:11 pm to BugAC
there is not an answer that fits every situation, you have to adapt to every particular circumstance. 

Posted on 8/20/23 at 6:11 pm to BugAC
They’ve become very useful for identifying which candidates and their followers are little bitches and won’t participate.
Posted on 8/20/23 at 6:12 pm to BugAC
In a society where podcasts have become all the rage, you would think people would enjoy hearing candidates talk about their policies with other candidates.
Posted on 8/20/23 at 6:12 pm to BugAC
C.
My guy, rumblin tumblin Ron would be better off on the campaign trail.
My guy, rumblin tumblin Ron would be better off on the campaign trail.
Posted on 8/20/23 at 6:12 pm to BugAC
quote:
Go on record. In regards to political debates to run for any office
Lacks context.
D) no - debate not needed if you’ve already served 1 term and are up 30+ points on the nearest candidate who has NOT served any term.
I pick D
This post was edited on 8/20/23 at 6:13 pm
Posted on 8/20/23 at 6:12 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
D) no - debate not needed for f you’ve already served 1 term and are up 30+ points on the nearest candidate who had NOT served any term. I pick D
So it’s C. Only Trump needs to be protected. Got it.
Posted on 8/20/23 at 6:13 pm to BugAC
Yep such a coward to answer 3 options that force something I don’t believe so you get your “I got ya moment” on here.
How about d. Let the goons do the first debate and let trump see how it affects him.
There’s no rules saying you have to do these. Why would you give cable networks the attention when they’re supposedly evil? Trump, he’s going non network to discuss his campaign with a better host. Why is that so bad?
How about d. Let the goons do the first debate and let trump see how it affects him.
There’s no rules saying you have to do these. Why would you give cable networks the attention when they’re supposedly evil? Trump, he’s going non network to discuss his campaign with a better host. Why is that so bad?
This post was edited on 8/20/23 at 6:14 pm
Posted on 8/20/23 at 6:14 pm to BugAC
quote:
So it’s C. Only Trump needs to be protected. Got it.
Nope. The polling suggests the voters already have decided and we all know his policy positions from his first term.
I’d say the same for any candidate n that situation.
This post was edited on 8/20/23 at 6:15 pm
Posted on 8/20/23 at 6:15 pm to momentoftruth87
He’s just gonna keep making shite up. Like I said they have no real position other than their TDS. They’re like zombies.
Popular
Back to top
