- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

U.S. Court Rules Against the Removal of Refinery Blending Waivers
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:04 am
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:04 am
quote:
A court has struck down the Biden administration’s decision to deny biofuel blending waivers to small refineries.
The refiners sued after earlier this year the Environmental Protection Agency denied almost all requests for the so-called ‘hardship waivers” from refiners who said the requirement to blend a certain amount of biofuel into their products would cause them financial hardship.
Under the Renewable Fuel Standard, oil refiners are required to blend growing amounts of renewable fuels into gasoline and diesel. Refiners that don’t have the infrastructure to blend biofuels must purchase tradeable blending credits known as Renewable Identification Numbers, or RINs.
The EPA has the authority to grant waivers from the RFS to refineries whose oil processing capacity is below 75,000 barrels per day (bpd) and who can prove that blending biofuels would hurt them financially to an unsustainable level.
In July, the EPA denied as many as 26 petitions from 15 small refineries that had applied for waivers for the 2016-2018 and 2021-2023 compliance years.
“After reviewing more than a decade of RFS market data and confidential information submitted by petitioning small refineries, EPA concluded that none of the 26 SRE petitions demonstrated disproportionate economic hardship caused by compliance with the RFS program,” the agency said at the time.
The refiners sued, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided in their favor, saying in its ruling that the EPA’s decision had been "impermissibly retroactive; contrary to law; and counter to the record evidence".
Ever since the blending regime was first introduced, the refining industry and the biofuel industry have been locked in a tight race to lobby for their interests to the federal government. The biofuel industry has been dead against the hardship waivers for obvious reasons and the refining industry has been criticizing the ever-increasingly blending mandates.
LINK
These biofuel mandates need to end. A bi-partisan program that has done little more than screw American consumers.
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:06 am to ragincajun03
Under this administration I would expect this.
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:14 am to ragincajun03
frick the ethanol and biofuel industry and mandates.
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:18 am to ragincajun03
quote:
These biofuel mandates need to end. A bi-partisan program that has done little more than screw American consumers
True, but it has become a back door farm subsidy. It's not going anywhere.
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:24 am to Elblancodiablo
quote:
True, but it has become a back door farm subsidy. It's not going anywhere.
And Iowa being the first state every four years that Presidential Primary candidates heavily pander to make it even more certain that the idiocy of mandating food crops in fuel production is here to stay.
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:30 am to ragincajun03
Didn’t Bayou Rum originally start out as a biofuel venture?
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:42 am to redstick13
quote:
Didn’t Bayou Rum originally start out as a biofuel venture?
That I don’t know, but maybe?? Their distillery is practically next door to the Bob Odom Boondoggle sugar cane rail facility.
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:45 am to crewdepoo
quote:
Poor big govt bureaucrats
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:51 am to ragincajun03
I want to say it did but I’m not 100%. That was all rice country through there and some part of me wants to think sugar cane started becoming attractive because of the biofuel subsidies.
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:53 am to ragincajun03
It's hilarious how much we have allowed congress to delegate it's responsibilities.
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:59 am to redstick13
BP Biofuels had a port facility along the Mermentau River, on the Jennings side of the bank. From about 2000 to 2013ish or so there was a thought that such demand for “energy cane” as a biofuel would takeoff and become some sort of economic development.
I remember for a few years during that time BP Biofuel was trying to get large landowners with rice crops to agree to new longterm ag leases for growing some sort of cane that would be used to make fuel, similar to the cane in a limited area in Florida and in South America. Vast majority of the landowners in Jeff Davis Parish and other areas were smart enough to say “heck no”.
The Mermentau facility out there was eventually shut down. A huge boondoggle of an effort. Probably largely funded with government tax dollars.
I remember for a few years during that time BP Biofuel was trying to get large landowners with rice crops to agree to new longterm ag leases for growing some sort of cane that would be used to make fuel, similar to the cane in a limited area in Florida and in South America. Vast majority of the landowners in Jeff Davis Parish and other areas were smart enough to say “heck no”.

The Mermentau facility out there was eventually shut down. A huge boondoggle of an effort. Probably largely funded with government tax dollars.
This post was edited on 11/24/23 at 9:03 am
Posted on 11/24/23 at 9:07 am to ragincajun03
quote:
EPA concluded that none of the 26 SRE petitions demonstrated disproportionate economic hardship caused by compliance with the RFS program
None of them were smart enough to say the rules disproportionally harmed their black transgender employees?
Posted on 11/24/23 at 9:09 am to ragincajun03
Not related but whoever is running that rice farm just west of Mermentau has a big time operation. I’d like to know how many acres they’re farming. They have several massive JD harvestors they break out in the fall.
This post was edited on 11/24/23 at 9:22 am
Posted on 11/24/23 at 9:10 am to crewdepoo
Posted on 11/24/23 at 9:25 am to Oneforthemoney
It’s hard not but try to pay crewdepooforbrains any attention. She is just a typical really dumb, rabid liberal that has a severe mental derangement.
Posted on 11/24/23 at 9:27 am to Oneforthemoney
quote:
You do realize ethanol destroys engines right?
yup. Its why i go out of my way to put ethanol free fuel in my vehicle and basically only use stihl moto mix for the chainsaw and leaf blower.
Posted on 11/24/23 at 10:00 am to crewdepoo
quote:
Poor oil companies
The costs are past on to American consumers, but evidently you are smart enough to understand that.
Popular
Back to top
