Started By
Message
locked post

U.S. Court Rules Against the Removal of Refinery Blending Waivers

Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:04 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
24861 posts
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:04 am
quote:

A court has struck down the Biden administration’s decision to deny biofuel blending waivers to small refineries.

The refiners sued after earlier this year the Environmental Protection Agency denied almost all requests for the so-called ‘hardship waivers” from refiners who said the requirement to blend a certain amount of biofuel into their products would cause them financial hardship.

Under the Renewable Fuel Standard, oil refiners are required to blend growing amounts of renewable fuels into gasoline and diesel. Refiners that don’t have the infrastructure to blend biofuels must purchase tradeable blending credits known as Renewable Identification Numbers, or RINs.

The EPA has the authority to grant waivers from the RFS to refineries whose oil processing capacity is below 75,000 barrels per day (bpd) and who can prove that blending biofuels would hurt them financially to an unsustainable level.

In July, the EPA denied as many as 26 petitions from 15 small refineries that had applied for waivers for the 2016-2018 and 2021-2023 compliance years.

“After reviewing more than a decade of RFS market data and confidential information submitted by petitioning small refineries, EPA concluded that none of the 26 SRE petitions demonstrated disproportionate economic hardship caused by compliance with the RFS program,” the agency said at the time.

The refiners sued, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided in their favor, saying in its ruling that the EPA’s decision had been "impermissibly retroactive; contrary to law; and counter to the record evidence".

Ever since the blending regime was first introduced, the refining industry and the biofuel industry have been locked in a tight race to lobby for their interests to the federal government. The biofuel industry has been dead against the hardship waivers for obvious reasons and the refining industry has been criticizing the ever-increasingly blending mandates.


LINK

These biofuel mandates need to end. A bi-partisan program that has done little more than screw American consumers.
Posted by TJack
BR
Member since Dec 2018
3059 posts
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:06 am to
Under this administration I would expect this.
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
20045 posts
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:14 am to
frick the ethanol and biofuel industry and mandates.
Posted by tankyank13
NOLA
Member since Nov 2012
7934 posts
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:15 am to
FJB

Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
125548 posts
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:15 am to
frick progressives
Posted by Elblancodiablo
Member since Sep 2023
1829 posts
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:18 am to
quote:

These biofuel mandates need to end. A bi-partisan program that has done little more than screw American consumers

True, but it has become a back door farm subsidy. It's not going anywhere.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
24861 posts
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:24 am to
quote:

True, but it has become a back door farm subsidy. It's not going anywhere.


And Iowa being the first state every four years that Presidential Primary candidates heavily pander to make it even more certain that the idiocy of mandating food crops in fuel production is here to stay.
Posted by crewdepoo
Hogwarts
Member since Jan 2015
10505 posts
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:24 am to
Poor oil companies
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
39798 posts
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:30 am to
Didn’t Bayou Rum originally start out as a biofuel venture?
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
24861 posts
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:42 am to
quote:

Didn’t Bayou Rum originally start out as a biofuel venture?


That I don’t know, but maybe?? Their distillery is practically next door to the Bob Odom Boondoggle sugar cane rail facility.
Posted by tankyank13
NOLA
Member since Nov 2012
7934 posts
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:45 am to

quote:

Poor big govt bureaucrats


Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
39798 posts
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:51 am to
I want to say it did but I’m not 100%. That was all rice country through there and some part of me wants to think sugar cane started becoming attractive because of the biofuel subsidies.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
74969 posts
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:53 am to
It's hilarious how much we have allowed congress to delegate it's responsibilities.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
24861 posts
Posted on 11/24/23 at 8:59 am to
BP Biofuels had a port facility along the Mermentau River, on the Jennings side of the bank. From about 2000 to 2013ish or so there was a thought that such demand for “energy cane” as a biofuel would takeoff and become some sort of economic development.

I remember for a few years during that time BP Biofuel was trying to get large landowners with rice crops to agree to new longterm ag leases for growing some sort of cane that would be used to make fuel, similar to the cane in a limited area in Florida and in South America. Vast majority of the landowners in Jeff Davis Parish and other areas were smart enough to say “heck no”.

The Mermentau facility out there was eventually shut down. A huge boondoggle of an effort. Probably largely funded with government tax dollars.
This post was edited on 11/24/23 at 9:03 am
Posted by EmmittLBrown
Member since Oct 2023
275 posts
Posted on 11/24/23 at 9:07 am to
quote:

EPA concluded that none of the 26 SRE petitions demonstrated disproportionate economic hardship caused by compliance with the RFS program


None of them were smart enough to say the rules disproportionally harmed their black transgender employees?
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
39798 posts
Posted on 11/24/23 at 9:09 am to
Not related but whoever is running that rice farm just west of Mermentau has a big time operation. I’d like to know how many acres they’re farming. They have several massive JD harvestors they break out in the fall.
This post was edited on 11/24/23 at 9:22 am
Posted by Oneforthemoney
New Iberia, La
Member since Dec 2013
2175 posts
Posted on 11/24/23 at 9:10 am to
quote:

Poor oil companies


You do realize ethanol destroys engines right?
LINK
Posted by 31TIGERS
Mike’s habitat
Member since Dec 2004
7219 posts
Posted on 11/24/23 at 9:25 am to
It’s hard not but try to pay crewdepooforbrains any attention. She is just a typical really dumb, rabid liberal that has a severe mental derangement.
Posted by UnitedFruitCompany
Bay Area
Member since Nov 2018
3716 posts
Posted on 11/24/23 at 9:27 am to
quote:

You do realize ethanol destroys engines right?


yup. Its why i go out of my way to put ethanol free fuel in my vehicle and basically only use stihl moto mix for the chainsaw and leaf blower.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
39613 posts
Posted on 11/24/23 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Poor oil companies


The costs are past on to American consumers, but evidently you are smart enough to understand that.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram