Started By
Message

re: Phillip Marshall's blog on Auburn moving east

Posted on 10/5/11 at 12:36 pm to
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
44911 posts
Posted on 10/5/11 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

While I admit that I'm new to the SEC politics, seems to me that Auburn fans are a little bit too eager to make the move East, whether they think it will be for easier competition (doubtful over the long term), or, more likely, just as a way to stick to Bama by making them give up the Tennessee annual game.


Did you read the link?
Posted by cyde
He gone
Member since Nov 2005
31877 posts
Posted on 10/5/11 at 1:18 pm to
I vote that we keep UT and Auburn keeps LSU.
Posted by twk
Wichita Falls, Texas
Member since Jul 2011
2825 posts
Posted on 10/5/11 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

Did you read the link?
Yes, I read it. I think the author is a little bit off base when he's speculating about 9 league games as a way of preserving Bama vs. UT. I guess if Missouri does come, we'll find out soon enough.
Posted by Geaux2002
Member since Jun 2011
3561 posts
Posted on 10/5/11 at 3:02 pm to
Going to 9 games and having 2 permanent cross divisional rivalries won't work. First off that leaves 5 teams cross division for an opponent to play, which means it would take 10 years to play every team twice (one home and one away). That is ridiculous.

The best thing to do in my opinion is go to 9 games and if Auburn is moved, cut the permanent rivalries out completely. This would even out the conference as a whole and you'd still play your rival twice every five years.
Posted by SFVtiger
Member since Oct 2003
4439 posts
Posted on 10/5/11 at 3:07 pm to
this is the way i feel about preserving traditional rivalries:

If you were starting a new conference that had NO rivalries and it consisted of 2 divisions and enough non conference games so that you could not or did not want to play a round robin, there is no doubt that you would rotate the non-divisional opponents (i.e. no permanent opponent). Why? because it is obviously the fair thing to do.

A traditional rivalry undermines fairness in favor of the two schools participating.

I say if you want to preserve the traditional rivalry, then play each other as a non conference game when it's not on the regular rotation.

Fairness is preserved. It just doesn't count as a conference game unless it's in the regular rotation.

If Tn/Ala or Aub/Ga doesn't like it, don't play each other except on the regular rotation. but don't ask the rest of the league to give up a fair formula for your benefit.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
44911 posts
Posted on 10/5/11 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

If Tn/Ala or Aub/Ga doesn't like it, don't play each other except on the regular rotation. but don't ask the rest of the league to give up a fair formula for your benefit.


ILikeWYDT
Posted by Michael J
Member since Jan 2011
1673 posts
Posted on 10/5/11 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

think it bull shite if the SEC goes out of it's way to preserve TWO rival games for bama. i wholeheartedly agree with preserving the iron bowl, but prserving the ut/bama game every year is bull shite. how about preserving other rivalries in the sec? what are we, chopped liver?


Its the nuttless SEC AD's that allow this. If all of the AD's outside of Alabama & Auburn would grow a pair shite like this would never happen.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
26304 posts
Posted on 10/5/11 at 5:38 pm to
There should be no cross conference rivals. Put rivals in the same division and be done with favoritism. Rotate out division games. Simple!
Posted by attheua
Tuscaloosa
Member since Apr 2008
5442 posts
Posted on 10/5/11 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

While I admit that I'm new to the SEC politics, seems to me that Auburn fans are a little bit too eager to make the move East, whether they think it will be for easier competition (doubtful over the long term), or, more likely, just as a way to stick to Bama by making them give up the Tennessee annual game.


Congrats, you nailed it.
Posted by attheua
Tuscaloosa
Member since Apr 2008
5442 posts
Posted on 10/5/11 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

Its the nuttless SEC AD's that allow this. If all of the AD's outside of Alabama & Auburn would grow a pair shite like this would never happen.


You're forgetting Tennessee and UGA, those games are important to 4 schools.
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20997 posts
Posted on 10/5/11 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

Its the nuttless SEC AD's that allow this. If all of the AD's outside of Alabama & Auburn would grow a pair shite like this would never happen.


And Tennessee. And Georgia.
This post was edited on 10/5/11 at 5:55 pm
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20997 posts
Posted on 10/5/11 at 5:57 pm to
From the article:

quote:

The SEC cannot and will not give up the Auburn-Alabama and Alabama-Tennessee rivalries.

Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20997 posts
Posted on 10/5/11 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

You're forgetting Tennessee and UGA, those games are important to 4 schools.


I'd say the whole issue about preserving rivalries is the most important to Tennessee. UT seems to be the only one who may lose their biggest rival if Auburn goes East.
This post was edited on 10/5/11 at 6:00 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram