Started By
Message

re: If the vote to admit TAMU into the SEC was 10-2

Posted on 9/6/11 at 10:50 pm to
Posted by WoodlandsAg07
Where Our Stadiums Drop the Top, TX
Member since Aug 2011
288 posts
Posted on 9/6/11 at 10:50 pm to
Why would Ole Miss say no except principle?
Posted by RhodeIslandRed
Adrift Off the Spanish Main
Member since Aug 2009
3175 posts
Posted on 9/6/11 at 10:54 pm to
quote:

brother, if LSU was against it, TAMU would have never been offered



I'm not saying you're wrong, but would like to know why you feel that way.
Posted by Uncle Stu
#AlbinoLivesMatter
Member since Aug 2004
33847 posts
Posted on 9/6/11 at 10:56 pm to
quote:

Why would Ole Miss say no except principle?

that's a good question - makes no sense
Posted by RhodeIslandRed
Adrift Off the Spanish Main
Member since Aug 2009
3175 posts
Posted on 9/6/11 at 10:56 pm to
quote:

Why would Ole Miss say no except principle?


So that someone else would notice that they're still here?
Posted by RunningBlake
Member since Aug 2011
4121 posts
Posted on 9/6/11 at 10:57 pm to
There was a newspaper article in which LSU prez or chancellor questioned this whole thing, about expansion or TAMU or something.

I think BR Advocate

I do not remember specifics.

Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
36769 posts
Posted on 9/6/11 at 10:57 pm to
it was OM voting no along with vandy not voting but the official vote is 12-0.

lsu and arky want a&m more than anybody.
Posted by CavalryAg07
ChiTown
Member since Jul 2009
2834 posts
Posted on 9/6/11 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

Rivals Radio said Vandy Abstained and Ole Miss said no.


looks like we found our new rival. lol

the Official vote tonight was 12-0. that's all that matters.
This post was edited on 9/6/11 at 11:01 pm
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
36769 posts
Posted on 9/6/11 at 11:00 pm to
that was just posturing. lsu voted no last time but it was om from the tweets and what texags are saying.


and om doesnt want to finish 7th in west, 6th is bad enough.
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
37171 posts
Posted on 9/6/11 at 11:09 pm to
quote:

brother, if LSU was against it, TAMU would have never been offered

LSU was for it...
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
49830 posts
Posted on 9/6/11 at 11:15 pm to
Hell LSU was leading the charge along with Arky if for no other reason then to just frick with Texas.
Posted by gatorprincess815
Founder of Tim Tebow Fan Club.
Member since Jul 2009
18452 posts
Posted on 9/6/11 at 11:21 pm to
I heard the vote was 12-0.
Posted by RhodeIslandRed
Adrift Off the Spanish Main
Member since Aug 2009
3175 posts
Posted on 9/6/11 at 11:23 pm to
quote:

TUTHILLTIGER


So, do you live on Tuthill Lane? If so then you could probably throw a rock and hit the house that Mrs. RhodeIslandRed grew up in.
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
87067 posts
Posted on 9/6/11 at 11:50 pm to
quote:

LSU for sure



We were against it a few weeks ago. You are probably right.
Posted by hoginthesw
DFW
Member since Sep 2009
5329 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 5:20 am to
There's no way in hell it was Arkansas. That's laughable. We are tied to them for 7 more years with or without realignment. We have too much history and way too much at stake in Texas to blow this up. There were even reports flying around of us posturing hard for Mizzou since a 14th is inevitable. Why the frick would we be pro-Mizzou and anti-Aggie??

I am going to agree that it was most likely Ole Miss. Of the west schools, they stand to lose the most. This is just another hurdle in the west for them, and let's face it; the future looks gloomy in Oxford for the time being.
This post was edited on 9/7/11 at 5:21 am
Posted by Uncle JackD
Member since Nov 2007
59436 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 5:22 am to
quote:

if LSU had a problem i think we would have heard more about it.
Definitely
Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 5:23 am to
quote:

Why would Ole Miss say no except principle?
they don't want to be the 7th best team in the west?
Posted by hoginthesw
DFW
Member since Sep 2009
5329 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 5:48 am to
Does Ken Starr have close ties to anyone at Ole Miss?
Posted by athletemed
The Woodlands, Texas
Member since Oct 2007
5871 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 7:03 am to
quote:

You a fricking tard!! Lsu ain't Texas, you don't run the show. Your just another bitch in slive's stable.


you really have no clue do you. If you dont think that Slive listens to what some schools tell him, you are dumb.

LSU runs more of the show than Arkansas does that is for damn sure. Same can be said of Alabama, Florida and Georgia.

you seriously dont think that Vandy or Kentucky or Ole Miss even have the same stroke as LSU or Bama....

tard
This post was edited on 9/7/11 at 7:17 am
Posted by BuckeyeFan87
Columbus
Member since Dec 2007
25249 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 7:44 am to
quote:

brother, if LSU was against it, TAMU would have never been offered LSU was for it...


Because LSU runs tSEC.
Posted by hoginthesw
DFW
Member since Sep 2009
5329 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 7:57 am to
quote:

Because LSU runs tSEC


we all know it's bama
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram