Started By
Message

re: Austin American Statesman: Big 12 "is done" ... Texas has 3 realignment options

Posted on 9/13/11 at 11:33 am to
Posted by athletemed
The Woodlands, Texas
Member since Oct 2007
5871 posts
Posted on 9/13/11 at 11:33 am to
How can I say this delicately...



frick TEXAS!
This post was edited on 9/13/11 at 1:37 pm
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
26541 posts
Posted on 9/13/11 at 11:33 am to
quote:

Talk about long road trips in either of those conferences.
Yes, that would suck for players, but fans will have no problem catching flights to see games.

ACC does present a better fit from a time zone perspective...gaining an hour on trip back home would be helpful...coming back from a trip on the west coast and losing two hours would hurt.

I have to think that UT prefers the Pac-12, but will their greed (re: LHN) doom them?
Posted by mikeytig
NE of Tiger Stadium
Member since Nov 2007
7723 posts
Posted on 9/13/11 at 11:34 am to
Dodds may have caused himself and UT alot of problems with this ESPN deal didnt he? Why is Dodds so opposed to going independent?
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
26541 posts
Posted on 9/13/11 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Why is Dodds so opposed to going independent?
scheduling issues, especially for the minor sports...

Plus, its the fear of the unknown...with the landscape changing so quickly, who knows if being independent is a good thing.
This post was edited on 9/13/11 at 11:36 am
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 9/13/11 at 11:40 am to
quote:

Who would you say would be #2?


florida.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
61942 posts
Posted on 9/13/11 at 12:04 pm to
What's wrong with the Big 10 for UT? Seems like a pretty good fit.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
26541 posts
Posted on 9/13/11 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

What's wrong with the Big 10 for UT? Seems like a pretty good fit.
far away...cold...believes in equal sharing...what will stop Ohio State from getting its own network if the Big Ten allows Texas to have its own? Will that be fair to the schools in the conference that don't have their own network? Plus, there is already a Big Ten Network.

This post was edited on 9/13/11 at 12:07 pm
Posted by Larry Hollins
Member since Jul 2009
1545 posts
Posted on 9/13/11 at 12:07 pm to
no way florida better than texas. there are probably 5 or less public universities that are better than texas. think along the lines of virginia, maybe north carolina, cal berkeley etc.
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
83489 posts
Posted on 9/13/11 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

"Texas really isn't happy with the way the Pac-12 would like to align the conference," a well-placed source said. "They want to put all the former Pac-8 schools in one division and group all the former Big 12 schools (assuming Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Texas and Texas Tech join) with Utah and the Arizona schools." Texas wants to be in the same division as UCLA and Southern Cal, which would be tougher, but it would also guarantee the Longhorns a trip to Los Angeles every year. Think recruiting.


Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
78832 posts
Posted on 9/13/11 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Texas wants to be in the same division as UCLA and Southern Cal, which would be tougher, but it would also guarantee the Longhorns a trip to Los Angeles every year. Think recruiting.


They have a rude awakening coming to them. The Pac-12 and even the ACC aren't going to let them waltz in and start dictating the terms. They'll have to swallow their pride and share the Dwindling XII with their old SWC mates, and maybe invite BYU/Air Force/Memphis/Tulane to expand the footprint.

Or, maybe CUSA or the MWC would be interested in giving the Horns a home.
Posted by TulsaTimeTiger
Edmond, OK
Member since Dec 2003
1100 posts
Posted on 9/13/11 at 12:27 pm to
From the Statesman article:

"The bottom line: Oklahoma wants to leave. Texas wants to stay but knows it probably has to leave too. Things are bound to change, and the Longhorns are willing to sit back and wait to choose their destiny."

The part about Longhorns sitting back and choosing their destiny now could not be further from the truth. Texas chose their destiny by clinging to LHN...and now they are watching Aggie and OU make critical choices that frankly reduce the choices now available to Texas.
Posted by bgator85
Sarasota
Member since Aug 2007
6167 posts
Posted on 9/13/11 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

no way florida better than texas. there are probably 5 or less public universities that are better than texas. think along the lines of virginia, maybe north carolina, cal berkeley etc.


The gap is not that large between UF and UT. Depends on who is doing the ranking and what they are ranking. UF and UT were tied in the US News rankings just 3 years ago, UT ranks higher now. UF is ranked way ahead in Forbes list. Rankings of research institutions sometimes have one over the other. Both are big, significant research institutions that have very highly selective admissions.
Posted by LSUisjustOK
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2011
3506 posts
Posted on 9/13/11 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

The gap is not that large between UF and UT


I was thinking the same thing. Rankings are mostly bullshite no matter how you cut it. What really matters is the ranking of the specific program of study each student is interested in. And those vary wildly across schools. The big thing about conference academics is perception. And though Florida and Alabama have excellent academics, they can suffer from the stupidity of the t-shirt fans.
Posted by daboman of Aggieland
Columbia, MO
Member since Aug 2011
1330 posts
Posted on 9/13/11 at 12:38 pm to
Whoever wants to invite the Whorns to their conference should read this column from the Kansas City Star.

Breaking up the Big 12 is not a collegial act
LINK
quote:

No other major power, not Florida, Ohio State, Michigan, anybody, acts on its arrogance as destructively as Texas.

I overheard this exchange Saturday.

“How many conferences is Texas going to destroy?”

Answer: “Every one it joins.”
Posted by Dr Drunkenstein
Washington DC
Member since May 2009
2918 posts
Posted on 9/13/11 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

Stu, what's the background on these guys? Are they mouthpieces for UT?


Bohls has been weird recently. Like he is becoming senile. He wrote one article a couple of months back saying the QBs had been told by the coaches that Garret Gilbert had been named the starter and then a couple of weeks later wrote another article lighting up the coaching staff for not having yet named a starter. He is all over the place.

quote:

This is terrible for Texas. What a colossal frick up it'll be if they end up in the ACC.


I don't think Texas will be in the ACC....but if it happened, why would it be a colossal frick up? Texas wouldn't go ACC unless it keeps the LHN. Texas has plenty of $ for the travel.

quote:

I have to think that UT prefers the Pac-12, but will their greed (re: LHN) doom them?


This is over the head of the athletics department now. The University bigwigs don't want to lose the many, many millions from the LHN which go straight to academics. Texas will go independent or play in a joke Big 12 before it parts with the LHN.

quote:

far away...cold...believes in equal sharing...what will stop Ohio State from getting its own network if the Big Ten allows Texas to have its own? Will that be fair to the schools in the conference that don't have their own network? Plus, there is already a Big Ten Network.


I think a lot of people will be surprised with what the Big 10 and Texas cook up.
Posted by Macavity92
Member since Dec 2004
6270 posts
Posted on 9/13/11 at 12:56 pm to
I think the ACC has a better chance than most people think. Check this out:

_____________________________________________
That would leave the Longhorns with several unpalatable choices. They could go independent in football and attempt to park the rest of their sports in another league -- as Notre Dame and BYU do. Or they could attempt to join the ACC, which might not make geographic sense but which does have a media rights setup that would allow for the Longhorn Network in its current form.
________________________________________


LINK
Posted by bgator85
Sarasota
Member since Aug 2007
6167 posts
Posted on 9/13/11 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

The big thing about conference academics is perception


I agree completely. When I was doing research at UF, this was constantly talked about by the academics. The national perception is hampered by being in the SEC, you sort of get lumped into other schools rightly or wrongly.
Posted by Carlos Santannaclaus
Houston
Member since Jan 2008
3272 posts
Posted on 9/13/11 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

The first is the well-being of its student-athletes. Traveling back and forth across the country and different time zones can make life extremely difficult for students trying to cram for midterms. The ACC with its Eastern time zone would present a more favorable option for game times and late-night travel than the Pac-12.


All I can say about this is....horse crap. This is what galls me about Texas. They know this is bullshite, we know this is bullshite, yet they feed it to us as if we're supposed to buy it? C'mon, man....I was born at night, but it wasn't last night.
Posted by rileytiger
Surfing The Gulf of America
Member since Feb 2007
3940 posts
Posted on 9/13/11 at 1:16 pm to
Why not just go independent for the time being? They should hold out and see if the Big 10 will expand. Geographically and Academically that is their best option IMO.
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
10997 posts
Posted on 9/13/11 at 1:23 pm to
If Texas is willing to swallow a little bit of pride--not a lot--it would be welcome with open arms into the big ten. Yes losing the LHN would hurt, but the BTN isn't chicken feed.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram