- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Why would LSU waive...
Posted on 1/11/11 at 10:07 am
Posted on 1/11/11 at 10:07 am
the buyout?
How does that benefit LSU?
How does that benefit LSU?
Posted on 1/11/11 at 10:08 am to Philosoraptor
leverage to request a home and home
Posted on 1/11/11 at 10:09 am to Philosoraptor
LSU disputed it per Ott.
Joe Schad - "I don't really care who's the source on any story. I don't care, and I don't know why people are so worked up about it. All I care about is what is true."
Joe Schad - "I don't really care who's the source on any story. I don't care, and I don't know why people are so worked up about it. All I care about is what is true."
Posted on 1/11/11 at 10:09 am to Philosoraptor
Because we want Les gone in order to allow Bill Belichek to accept the LSU job.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 10:10 am to Philosoraptor
Sounds like they are trying to make it as easy as possible for Michigan to hire him.
It seems that LSU wants to get out from under that crazy contract.
It seems that LSU wants to get out from under that crazy contract.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 10:12 am to Housplants
quote:
Sounds like they are trying to make it as easy as possible for Michigan to hire him.
That makes no sense whatsoever
Posted on 1/11/11 at 10:13 am to Philosoraptor
Funny how things change so quickly.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 10:13 am to Philosoraptor
It gives LSU the opportunity to attract a coach that can count to three. It will also allow the LSU administration to rid itself of the embarrasment that they have endured throughout the entirety of the season. Les is not going to win another national championship here, he is just not. Do you ask remember the scrutiny he was under throughout the first part if the season. That scrutiny was becomed by most of you all. Coaches were at arms with each other, blaming everyone but themselves. I believe in the long run lsu will benefit immensely from les's departure.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 10:14 am to Philosoraptor
double post...
This post was edited on 1/11/11 at 10:17 am
Posted on 1/11/11 at 10:15 am to Housplants
Alleva is going to try to either keep Miles and if that does not work expedite the process of losing him and getting a replacement quick. It does way more harm to LSU if this process is extended.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 10:15 am to Gekko
quote:
It gives LSU the opportunity to attract a coach that can count to three.
You are an idiot
quote:
Les is not going to win another national championship here
You are an idiot
quote:
I believe in the long run lsu will benefit immensely from les's departure.
You are an idiot
Posted on 1/11/11 at 10:15 am to More beer please
Because this is how contracts work. Say Miles actually wants to go to UM, but UM says they can't get the extra 1.25 million for the buyout. If you're LSU, do you keep a coach here against his will? No, you don't because your product may suffer from him wanting to be somewhere else. A contract is nothing more than a loose agreement between 2 parties. It has very little worth outside of that.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 10:17 am to jturn17
quote:
but UM says they can't get the extra 1.25 million for the buyout.
Oh but they can and that arguement is weak at best
Posted on 1/11/11 at 10:18 am to Philosoraptor
Probably not likely in today's world, but it could be that there is enough respect for the type of man Miles is and the way he's represented the university, that if that's where his heart is and he really wants it, LSU will be willing to allow him to make the move. That would only be possible IF LSU has already reached an agreement with another coach who would not be subject to a contract buyout of his own (therefore, no real need for the cash)......food for thought. 
Posted on 1/11/11 at 10:19 am to More beer please
I didn't say it was a good argument. It's called game theory and contract negotiations. Let's say UM refuses to pay it, but Les wants the job. You force him to stay and live out the contract? If so, your making a management mistake.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 10:20 am to Philosoraptor
quote:
Why would LSU waive the buyout?
Just to piss Choctaw off.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 10:20 am to Bubba Bexley
quote:
(therefore, no real need for the cash)......food for thought
It looks so bad on the university if we dont get that money. You have to consider that even though the athletic departmet is seperate the university as a whole is in a huge budget crisis and cuts are coming left and right. Then need to get that money to save face
Posted on 1/11/11 at 10:23 am to More beer please
Prove me wrong more beer.
Undoubtedly les is clueless during games regarding timeouts remaining.
Let me guess you are one of those simple minded, win me one game and ill get on my knees, kind of guy.
Long run vs. Short run... One of the principles college academics was founded on. Do you know what the J curve is? Of course not....
Undoubtedly les is clueless during games regarding timeouts remaining.
Let me guess you are one of those simple minded, win me one game and ill get on my knees, kind of guy.
Long run vs. Short run... One of the principles college academics was founded on. Do you know what the J curve is? Of course not....
Posted on 1/11/11 at 10:25 am to More beer please
This is silly.
If Michigan cannot afford the buyout, they cannot afford the discussion.
LSU would malpractice if it relieved Les of the buyout. Michigan is going to pay it anyway and it will form the basis of the signing bonus we will offer to any good new headcoach.
Put differently, how would you like to go to fifnacial supporters and tell them we need money to sign someone new, but just gave away 1.5 million to lose our existing coach
If Michigan cannot afford the buyout, they cannot afford the discussion.
LSU would malpractice if it relieved Les of the buyout. Michigan is going to pay it anyway and it will form the basis of the signing bonus we will offer to any good new headcoach.
Put differently, how would you like to go to fifnacial supporters and tell them we need money to sign someone new, but just gave away 1.5 million to lose our existing coach
Popular
Back to top


9



