Started By
Message

re: Why isn't Jim Grobe on more short lists?

Posted on 12/19/11 at 12:22 pm to
Posted by LSUTIGER in TEXAS
Member since Jan 2008
13692 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

We'll have to agree to disagree. I think coaches that can create - in your words - "miraculous coaching jobs" are damn good coaches in general. You don't see shitty coaches puking out miraculous coaching jobs, because they're shitty coaches.
ron zook did a miraculous coaching job in the first half of this season, then a shitty job in the second half. he went 6-6. most people would agree hes an average at best coach-- likely worse. bad coaches can do some good things and get on a roll-- it just never lasts
quote:

fantastic job here recruiting good players
really? if hes recruiting good players, and is a great coach, HOW IN THE frick DID HE GO 6-6?!?!?! in a routinely bad ACC
quote:

He came into a bad situation at a program
11 years ago. thats not a reason in year 11 to be .500
quote:

Next year should be a good season at Wake
7 wins?!?
quote:

We'll have to agree to disagree
yes, it looks as though we'll have to. i just completely disagree with most of what you believe. im glad you have a coach you really like and believe in, thats a good thing. clearly my definition and your definition of success is different. clearly the expectations i attach to "great" coaches are different than yours. and thats ok. i just dont think being average at a non-football factory is much of an achievement
Posted by LSUTIGER in TEXAS
Member since Jan 2008
13692 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

Who is a 'great coach' in your eyes?
in no particular order:

miles
saban
tressell
meyer
carroll
brown
stoops
hoke looks promising
im personally a big malzahn fan-- but hes yet to prove much other than calling plays for cam newton
chip kelly
petersen
patterson
Posted by Augustus
North Carolina
Member since Sep 2006
8290 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

ron zook did a miraculous coaching job in the first half of this season, then a shitty job in the second half. he went 6-6. most people would agree hes an average at best coach-- likely worse. bad coaches can do some good things and get on a roll-- it just never lasts

Yes, Ron Zook ran a powerhouse into the ground and Jim Grobe built a program to respectability. They're completely the same. Nice call.

quote:

really? if hes recruiting good players, and is a great coach, HOW IN THE frick DID HE GO 6-6?!?!?! in a routinely bad ACC

Because he can't recruit the same types of players as Clemson, Florida State, Miami, Virginia Tech, etc. It's the same problem that Vanderbilt, Duke and Northwestern run into. Are you really not understanding the differences here?

quote:

clearly the expectations i attach to "great" coaches are different than yours. and thats ok. i just dont think being average at a non-football factory is much of an achievement

Yes, our definitions are obviously different. Taking a program that has little fan support, a small alumni base, high academics, with 3 other BCS schools in the same state, and no tradition and taking them to a conference championship and on the cusp of going to two others is strong in my opinion.
This post was edited on 12/19/11 at 2:37 pm
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
73505 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 2:37 pm to
Pat Hill syndrome. He didn't strike when the iron was hot.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram