- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Why did Michigan wait so long to fire Rich Rod?
Posted on 1/9/11 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 1/9/11 at 1:35 pm
Does anyone here really believe that the bowl game was the final nail in the coffin? I dont..they were going to axe him regardless of the outcome in my opinion. So why wait?
Michigan fricked us over by delaying the process
Michigan fricked us over by delaying the process
Posted on 1/9/11 at 1:36 pm to Tigerbait337
Because their main targets both had bowl games in January to coach...And the decreased buyout, plus they played their bowl game on Jan 1
This post was edited on 1/9/11 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 1/9/11 at 1:36 pm to Tigerbait337
Because his buyout decreased after NYD. I believe it fell by $2.5M to $1.5M total. Or the other way around.
Posted on 1/9/11 at 1:36 pm to Tigerbait337
I heard it had to do with the date affecting how much the buyout on his contract was... after Jan 1 the buyout decreased, and at that point they might as well let him coach the bowl.
Posted on 1/9/11 at 1:37 pm to Tigerbait337
quote:
Why did Michigan wait so long to fire Rich Rod?
Does anyone here really believe that the bowl game was the final nail in the coffin? I dont..they were going to axe him regardless of the outcome in my opinion. So why wait?
Michigan fricked us over by delaying the process
So your thinking if they would've done it sooner, Les would've had time to interview earlier. Maybe in between Cotton Bowl interviews or windsprints in Cowboy stadium. Nice thread
Posted on 1/9/11 at 1:37 pm to Tigerbait337
The way his contract was structured it would have cost the school an extra 1.5 million to fire him before January 1.
Posted on 1/9/11 at 1:37 pm to Tigerbait337
Our AD stated that part of the reason is he doesnt feel it is fair to the players when the coach is fired. They should get to enjoy their bowl experience with the ones who got them there.
I think that is AD speak for "Our 2 top choices still had bowls to play". heh
I think that is AD speak for "Our 2 top choices still had bowls to play". heh
Posted on 1/9/11 at 1:38 pm to johnnydrama
Damn, I type slow. Three other posters answered while I was working on that. 
Posted on 1/9/11 at 1:39 pm to Chicken
quote:
Because their main targets both had bowl games in January to coach...And the decreased buyout, plus they played their bowl game on Jan 1
this
Posted on 1/9/11 at 1:40 pm to Tigerbait337
This may have been visible to those who watched from outside; interesting that Fla St just locked up Jimbo a couple days ago. FWIW I'd have preferred Jimbo, with him keeping Chief etc, over Pelini.
Don't forget in the grand scheme of things, in order to move up in the rankings, someone else has to drop. If Mich leaves LSU hanging in the wind with our pants down, they not only get their coach, but screw up a potential top-5 program too. Which is good for them.
Don't forget in the grand scheme of things, in order to move up in the rankings, someone else has to drop. If Mich leaves LSU hanging in the wind with our pants down, they not only get their coach, but screw up a potential top-5 program too. Which is good for them.
Posted on 1/9/11 at 1:41 pm to Pedro
quote:
MICHIGAN hates LSU
I didn't intend for it to be a conspiracy thread..
But thanks everyone, pretty much all of those post make sense
Posted on 1/9/11 at 1:42 pm to Scoob
quote:
This may have been visible to those who watched from outside; interesting that Fla St just locked up Jimbo a couple days ago. FWIW I'd have preferred Jimbo, with him keeping Chief etc, over Pelini.
Don't forget in the grand scheme of things, in order to move up in the rankings, someone else has to drop. If Mich leaves LSU hanging in the wind with our pants down, they not only get their coach, but screw up a potential top-5 program too. Which is good for them.
That is fine and dandy for a team looking to win 10+ games.
When you are waiting with baited breath hoping to win 8 games....not so much.
Posted on 1/9/11 at 1:48 pm to Tigerbait337
quote:
Does anyone here really believe that the bowl game was the final nail in the coffin?
Did you see how Miss State curbstomped them?
Bet you if Miles lost to A&M in a similar fashion there'd be a boatload of Rantards that would go Randy Quaid Christmas vacation and deliver Miles to Brandon like a pepperoni pizza.
Posted on 1/9/11 at 2:00 pm to Aged Woverine
quote:
That is fine and dandy for a team looking to win 10+ games.
When you are waiting with baited breath hoping to win 8 games....not so much.
Les is a manager, not a schemes guy; he doesn't force a team to play a certain style of offense or defense like Saban for example.
For the sake of discussion, let's say Les were to keep the offensive scheme intact, but pull in a solid defensive coach like Chief- where would Michigan be in yr 1, 2, 3? In the meantime, assuming we get Pelini at LSU, who likely would revamp the defense to his liking, where is LSU in that time period?
Posted on 1/9/11 at 2:03 pm to Chicken
quote:
Because their main targets both had bowl games in January to coach...And the decreased buyout, plus they played their bowl game on Jan 1
+1
Miles, Harbaugh were busy. And...maybe MI is interested in Malzahn? Just a thought. Anyone know any real estate agents in Ann Arbor??
Popular
Back to top
9









