The OL Underperformed---Davis

Hear me out. I'm gonna say no.
We have to realize importance of SEC level talent/production. Think about it. Most high 4 and 5 stars become SEC level average players. Every recruit will not become an all conference guy. (and no, star rankings are not necessarily the indicator of an SEC average level player)
Average SEC level players are the backbone of any good team. It is also the level you can't play below as a unit though an individual piece may be an above or below average player.
To me:
I think the C and RT played up to their abilities. One a below average OL in the SEC, one an average OL in the SEC.
I thought Ingram showed an SEC average game. I think he was a better player earlier in his career which shows he has enough talent--like the RT--to be a piece of a well above average line in the SEC. (2019)
Wire showed he could become an average SEC OL.
Hines performed at a below average level. His ceiling has always been fringe average SEC--which is hideable when surrounded by more talented players. His play if consistent would come in a notch below Ingram/Deculus.
Bradford and Martinez showed flashes of above average OL play. Dellinger's ceiling appears to me as SEC average but more than likely on the interior line. I'd like to see what he and Martinez would look like at C.
Turner is just not big enough to play SEC average at C. He's got good football actions and would probably be all-conference at a lower level--just not the P5 level.
I believe the OL did not underperform this season. I'll argue that I--like many others--just thought our players were better than they are!
When Davis got them to play as a unit--even with below SEC average talent--we ran and moved the ball on some good defenses. With injuries/position switching that was no small feat!
I say Davis did an exceptional job with what he had to work with. If Coach K brings in his own guy and I was with another team, I'd be on the horn with Davis in a heartbeat.