Started By
Message
locked post

So who replaces Chip Kelly at Oregon? Chris Petersen?

Posted on 1/23/12 at 12:58 am
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
88388 posts
Posted on 1/23/12 at 12:58 am
(no message)
Posted by dischNoutTAspd
Houston
Member since Nov 2009
909 posts
Posted on 1/23/12 at 1:05 am to
i think peterson JUST signed a extension.
Posted by Boobie Miles
Knoxville, TN
Member since Jun 2010
305 posts
Posted on 1/23/12 at 3:19 am to
quote:

i think peterson JUST signed a extension


Extensions really don't matter. Oregon would throw Nike money at Peterson if they could lock him down
Posted by wdeinttown
Tuscaloosa
Member since Dec 2011
2976 posts
Posted on 1/23/12 at 3:57 am to
Maybe the dude from WVU.
Posted by TheTigerZone
Moss Bluff ,La
Member since Dec 2009
2347 posts
Posted on 1/23/12 at 3:57 am to
quote:

i think peterson JUST signed a extension

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Posted by BayouTigers4Life
Chi-town
Member since Dec 2004
7047 posts
Posted on 1/23/12 at 4:03 am to
Petersen has already proved the point that he is not about chasing the buck. And there was this thing about his son's cancer treatment.

Besides how big is Eugene when compared to Boise?
Posted by OryGunDucks
Cascadia
Member since Aug 2011
847 posts
Posted on 1/23/12 at 5:47 am to
Peterson has ties to eugene. Oregon is the only place he would leave boise for. He is a former coach under belloti. In his contract their is a clause that oregon is the only job he can leave for and not have to pay the buyout.

chip kelly staying anyways so it dont matter now
Posted by crankbait
Member since Feb 2008
11650 posts
Posted on 1/23/12 at 6:05 am to
quote:

Peterson has ties to eugene. Oregon is the only place he would leave boise for. He is a former coach under belloti. In his contract their is a clause that oregon is the only job he can leave for and not have to pay the buyout. chip kelly staying anyways so it dont matter now


Well, that makes no sense. Why would they exclude Oregon in the buyout if that's the only place he'd leave for?
Posted by What Ever I Want
Mooresville, NC
Member since Jan 2005
765 posts
Posted on 1/23/12 at 6:07 am to
quote:

Well, that makes no sense. Why would they exclude Oregon in the buyout if that's the only place he'd leave for?


Because that would be the only contract he would sign... It's the same thing with Miles and Michigan. In one of his older contracts, that was the only school that didn't have a buyout. This is a common practice.
Posted by ELVIS U
Member since Feb 2007
11936 posts
Posted on 1/23/12 at 9:46 am to
It appears Kelly may replace himself.
Posted by Prominentwon
LSU, McNeese St. Fan
Member since Jan 2005
95097 posts
Posted on 1/23/12 at 10:03 am to
Yeah. Kelly said he wasn't going anywhere.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram