- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Many of you are extraordinarily naive about the consequences for LSU if LK coaches deep
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:13 pm to DmitriKaramazov
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:13 pm to DmitriKaramazov
quote:
under contract with two schools
you are projecting... i said they'd have something legally binding... never said he'd sign his official contract... they would do something, some way, to ensure there is no backing out... what that is, dunno... maybe a lawyer could school us on it... there are plenty of those around these forums...
quote:
and recruit for LSU while on Ole Miss staff
that's exceptionally easy... you really don't think he could do that? and i really think OM knows it's really easy for him to do, which is one of the reasons they don't want him hanging around if he's leaving...
quote:
all of this without ole miss consent
ole miss is going to have to make a decision... that's where we are now... that's what the meeting was all about... obviously, if they let him coach, they've given "consent"... not sure what you are arguing here...
quote:
I'll await your illuminating jurisprudential analysis.
no need for condescension... we are all just giving our own opinion, with the little bit of factual evidence we have to go on... you have yours, i have mine... and if it makes you feel any better, i'm no more right or wrong than you, or the next guy.... so lighten up, Francis...
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:14 pm to NorthSider72
BK was fired for far more than just 1 season. The rest of your post is complete nonsensical garbage. Desperate because we’re pointing out how fricking stupid it would be to turn down by far the best available coach on the market because we don’t want to wait a month? You and OP are absolute morons
This post was edited on 11/29/25 at 9:17 pm
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:14 pm to OpenlyGayDave
quote:
People like this woman (DmitriKaramazov) are the actual problem at LSU. They will always want LSU to fail
No, I wanted LSU to be strong in negotiations and protect its own interests and assert its leverage, not kowtow and accept a candidate at any price, as many of the panic-stricken on this board seem willing to do.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:14 pm to DmitriKaramazov
You are correct; people supportive aren’t thinking through all the implications. It’s not as simplistic as “others have recruiting duties”. I posted this in previous threads. Think it sums up why it’s stupid for LSU to allow Lane to continue coaching Ole Miss team:
If Kiffin accepts the HC position, in no way should LSU let him continue coaching Ole Miss thru the remainder of their season. One of the key aspects of the contract is what is the start date.
LSU cannot wait until Ole Miss season is over before his start date b/c worst case scenario 1) he’s absent from the December signing period, 2) delays staff hiring/recruitment while other teams are locking those guys down and 3) most importantly he misses the only transfer portal period for the entire football season. LSU cannot take that chance of not having him on staff.
Additionally, you can’t have a HC for two different teams at the same time. That’s a conflict of interest. It’s impossible for Kiffin to put each universities best interest at the forefront of all his decisions; like player transfer conversations at both LSU and Ole Miss.
Sucks for Kiffin and his players but if he wants the LSU job, LSU should mandate he accept the position full-time now and divests of his Ole Miss HC responsibilities the same day. That’s in LSUs best interest…
If Kiffin accepts the HC position, in no way should LSU let him continue coaching Ole Miss thru the remainder of their season. One of the key aspects of the contract is what is the start date.
LSU cannot wait until Ole Miss season is over before his start date b/c worst case scenario 1) he’s absent from the December signing period, 2) delays staff hiring/recruitment while other teams are locking those guys down and 3) most importantly he misses the only transfer portal period for the entire football season. LSU cannot take that chance of not having him on staff.
Additionally, you can’t have a HC for two different teams at the same time. That’s a conflict of interest. It’s impossible for Kiffin to put each universities best interest at the forefront of all his decisions; like player transfer conversations at both LSU and Ole Miss.
Sucks for Kiffin and his players but if he wants the LSU job, LSU should mandate he accept the position full-time now and divests of his Ole Miss HC responsibilities the same day. That’s in LSUs best interest…
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:15 pm to DmitriKaramazov
Honestly I’m sure there will be a plan in place. Cause he’s gonna tell LSU who he wants on his staff and they will go in the portal. It will get worked out!!!
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:18 pm to WhoKnows
quote:
no need for condescension... we are all just giving our own opinion, with the little bit of factual evidence we have to go on... you have yours, i have mine... and if it makes you feel any better, i'm no more right or wrong than you, or the next guy.... so lighten up, Francis...
You are correct. I stand by my substantive points, but I apologize for the needless tone. I get too invested in LSU FB. In the end it doesn't matter.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:25 pm to DmitriKaramazov
quote:
You are correct. I stand by my substantive points, but I apologize for the needless tone. I get too invested in LSU FB. In the end it doesn't matter.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:27 pm to kobsa
quote:
LSU should mandate he accept the position full-time now
why, when Ole Miss is apparently doing that for us already?
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:29 pm to DmitriKaramazov
for one thing, Ole MIss ain't going deep into the playoffs. yes, it will hurt some, but I understand why it is necessary.
Ole Miss would be foolish not to let him, and if he's the guy we really want, we have to accept it.
Ole Miss would be foolish not to let him, and if he's the guy we really want, we have to accept it.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:31 pm to DmitriKaramazov
This genuinely has to be the most INSANE coaching carousel ever
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:36 pm to DmitriKaramazov
quote:
there is really no way to legally bind him to a tenuous promise to join LSU at some point in the future unless Ole Miss consents. He could change his mind,
This is the only real concern for LSU.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:39 pm to WhoKnows
Apparently not b/c if they were this would be resolved by now.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:53 pm to kobsa
quote:
Apparently not b/c if they were this would be resolved by now.
are you paying attention... at all? they absolutely are telling him if he picks LSU he has to go now, they aren't letting him coach during the playoff...
so if they are telling him that, which apparently they are, then we don't need to do it too... let them be the bad guy and push him right to us... we get the end result we want anyway, without having to be the bad new bearer and giving him the ultimatum.... don't you see how that works to our favor?
Posted on 11/29/25 at 10:12 pm to WhoKnows
No need to get snotty but looks like you are the one not paying attention to current specifics. If they play hard ball and force him out now, they owe him a $36mil buyout which they are trying to avoid. Doesn’t appear LSU has given LK a contract start date which is giving him the flexibility to negotiate his departure parameters.
Popular
Back to top


1





