Started By
Message
locked post

Kelly - ND new coach per CFN

Posted on 12/8/09 at 4:19 pm
Posted by LC412000
Any location where a plane flies
Member since Mar 2004
16673 posts
Posted on 12/8/09 at 4:19 pm
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
40276 posts
Posted on 12/8/09 at 4:20 pm to
Just curious ... did Kelly ever say "I will not be the next coach at ND"???
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 12/8/09 at 4:25 pm to
where are these "published reports" CFN mentions?
Posted by LSUinMA
Commerce, Texas
Member since Nov 2008
4968 posts
Posted on 12/8/09 at 4:27 pm to
If true, I don't get this. I thought they wanted a defensive guy.
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
56723 posts
Posted on 12/8/09 at 4:31 pm to
If so, why didn't they go harder after Meyer?
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 12/8/09 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

If true, I don't get this. I thought they wanted a defensive guy.



The only reason i don't agree with hiring a defensive guy at Notre Dame is because of what the defensive-minded, conservative Tressel has done at tOSU.. win close, low-scoring games against other slow, defensive football teams in the Midwest and then get stomped by a fast, athletic team from the South or California.

I think Rich Rod has the right plan to win in that part of the country, have to recruit well in the south and go for speed over size. If Kelly is the guy ND hires here's my prediction: in three years he amasses enough offensive talent and this (in addition to be a better leader and overrall HC than Weiss) is enough to get through ND's weak schedule with one loss to USC. ND will then meet LSU in the national title game and get utterly destroyed a la 2006.

This post was edited on 12/8/09 at 4:34 pm
Posted by jw5587
Member since Nov 2009
920 posts
Posted on 12/8/09 at 4:33 pm to
If true, I think they really dropped the ball with this hire. ND is in a similar position as Bama was in 07. I think they should've tried to land a "name" to energize the fanbase and recruiting. I still think he's a terrific coach just at the wrong time.
Posted by kbro
North Carolina, via NOLA
Member since Jan 2007
5342 posts
Posted on 12/8/09 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

If so, why didn't they go harder after Meyer?


I would've thought ND would back the Brinks truck up to Urb's house, but after reading the article it sounds like they didn't make much of an attempt to get Meyer at all.
Posted by Acreboy
Member since Nov 2005
38568 posts
Posted on 12/8/09 at 4:40 pm to
i like him as a coach but if he doesn't coach Cincy in the Sugar Bowl im going to lose all respect for him.
Posted by Linkovich
crater lake
Member since Feb 2007
9553 posts
Posted on 12/8/09 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

i like him as a coach but if he doesn't coach Cincy in the Sugar Bowl im going to lose all respect for him.


Even if he does, it would be a half arse effort. He would be to worried about his new position. It puts Cincy in a tough spot.
Posted by jw5587
Member since Nov 2009
920 posts
Posted on 12/8/09 at 4:42 pm to
I agree. I lost a lot of respect for Rich Rod when he pulled that. The kids work hard to get to a bowl game. They shouldn't be hung out to dry like that.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
163153 posts
Posted on 12/8/09 at 4:44 pm to
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
56723 posts
Posted on 12/8/09 at 4:44 pm to
He would absolutely have to start recruiting immediately at ND, given how much they're losing, how much they need and how much of an uphill battle it'll be to start. I don't think coaching the bowl game should be an option.

This situation would be really interesting if Cincy were in the NCG.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
163153 posts
Posted on 12/8/09 at 4:45 pm to
cincy is getting skullfricked in that game with or without kelly
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
39413 posts
Posted on 12/8/09 at 4:46 pm to
Time to put a frickload of money on UF
Posted by LSUinMA
Commerce, Texas
Member since Nov 2008
4968 posts
Posted on 12/8/09 at 4:51 pm to

quote:

The only reason i don't agree with hiring a defensive guy at Notre Dame is because of what the defensive-minded, conservative Tressel has done at tOSU.. win close, low-scoring games against other slow, defensive football teams in the Midwest and then get stomped by a fast, athletic team from the South or California.


Well, I don't know that I agree that you have to be as conservative as Tressel if you hire a defensive guy. If they had hired Stoops, for instance, what's to stop Bobby from going out and getting a hot young OC and running a wide open offense, if that's what they wanted to do.

I'm not saying he would have done that, I'm just saying it doesn't necessarily have to be one or the other.
Posted by Ron Mexico
AMERICA
Member since Dec 2005
52037 posts
Posted on 12/8/09 at 4:52 pm to
yeah this sucks


been reading more and more about kelly over the past few weeks, and i was liking him even more


his vertical passing game would have been lethal with our talent
Posted by MastrShake
SoCal
Member since Nov 2008
7281 posts
Posted on 12/8/09 at 4:54 pm to
notre dame simply cannot do anything right. kelly is a huge gamble, one they didnt have to take.
Posted by kbro
North Carolina, via NOLA
Member since Jan 2007
5342 posts
Posted on 12/8/09 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

Time to put a frickload of money on UF
Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
33828 posts
Posted on 12/8/09 at 4:59 pm to
another one bites the dust. maybe the del rio era will start in 2 years.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram