Started By
Message

re: Could Saban really have the same success at Texas?

Posted on 12/15/13 at 3:39 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466751 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Great at Kentucky, good at Louisville.

he's been pretty good at UL

won a title and has had multiple #1/2 seeds

quote:

Spurrier, great at Florida and good at USCe.

So Carolina doesn't have near the talent or money that UF has...plus he's been fricking awesome there

the SEC is just a lot stronger these days

quote:

Holtz, great at ND and bad at USCe

what is this...i don' even...

Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
24294 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Texas has been #1 for about 8 years straight now without winning shite and calling for their coach's head.
Dude that is my whole point. So why is it a foregone conclusion that Saban can replicate the same thing there?
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62289 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 3:41 pm to
I'd like to see NFL merch. The Cowboys probably sell more than the Patriots or Seahawks or Saints

Eta: I realize I'm proving the opposite point
This post was edited on 12/15/13 at 3:42 pm
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
24294 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

SlowFlowPro
Dude you..... i..... I just said that and you point out examples proving my points.
This post was edited on 12/15/13 at 3:43 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466751 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

The Cowboys probably sell more than the Patriots or Seahawks or Saints

no fricking shite

again...winning by itself doesn't make you a national program

that's why Bama was on a multiple decade hiatus until Saban showed up

that's why Michigan has been a national program for 4 decades while only winning 1 title
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466751 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 3:43 pm to
petino was great at UK and is great at UL

spurrier was great at UF and is great at USC

it's the coach
This post was edited on 12/15/13 at 3:44 pm
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
24294 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

petino was great at UK and is great at UL
No
quote:

spurrier was great at UF and is great at USC
Frick no
quote:

it's the coach

Hell no
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62289 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

that's why Bama was on a multiple decade hiatus until Saban showed up
Posted by Laman1978
Earth
Member since Jan 2009
11542 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 3:45 pm to
So let me get this straight... Some of you Bama fans feel that Saban is mainly successful because he coaches at Bama and not some other school? Your arrogance has reached an all time high. I never imagined you would be knocking your own coach with the hopes of keeping his services.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62289 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

So let me get this straight... Some of you Bama fans feel that Saban is mainly successful because he coaches at Bama and not some other school?
No. No one has said that.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466751 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

No

he's been a 1/2 seed a great number of years at UL

quote:

Frick no

have you seen what South Carolina has done? i mean SOUTH CAROLINA...they were shittier than vandy when he took over

he's been awesome. multiple top-10 finishes. that's insane

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466751 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 3:47 pm to
nobody except SEC fans gave a frick about Bama until 2008, and then it was a national "LOL" at Saban for losing to Utah (he was still a national pariah at that time, if you recall...he was a villain)
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62289 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

i mean SOUTH CAROLINA.
Now you're proving our point. Spurrier was better at UF than SCar. Why?
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
24294 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

Some of you Bama fans feel that Saban is mainly successful because he coaches at Bama and not some other school?
Show me where he was able to do the same thing so fast previous to Bama. The right coach at the right program equals what you see from Bama and Saban. We need each other.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466751 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Spurrier was better at UF than SCar. Why?

UF has more money and more local talent

just like UT has more money and more local talent than Alabama, and LSU has more money and local talent than MSU
Posted by Laman1978
Earth
Member since Jan 2009
11542 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 3:48 pm to
You've basically been insinuating it all day.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62289 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

nobody except SEC fans gave a frick about Bama until 2008,
from 2005:

Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
24294 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

.they were shittier than vandy when he took over
Florida was pretty shitty when he took over as well, not Vandy shitty but shitty.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37135 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

coaches make the difference. you can't win at an elite level without a great one

Again, Patino. Great at Kentucky, good at Louisville. Huge difference. Spurrier, great at Florida and good at USCe. Holtz, great at ND and bad at USCe, decent at Arky I guess. Not really sure.


Don't try and change this argument from your earlier argument that "prior program success predicts future outcomes" to "every program has the same advantage"

Alabama with anything other than a special coach probably wins nothing worth mentioning. That is more true now than ever because of recruiting issues.

Texas, Texas A&M, LSU, Florida, FSU, Miami, USC, Oregon, tOSU, Michigan, etc win at elite levels with great coaches and don't without.

The idea however that a program like Michigan or Notre Dame or whatever historically successful program has an advantage of a more recently emerged power like Florida or whoever you like is fundamentally an idiotic hypothesis IMO. Texas is the ultimate example of an under-achieving program atm and with a Saban level coach could dominate college football like nothing we've seen before (assuming he can maintain his present levels of good coordinator hires, physical health, and mental acuity)
Posted by Laman1978
Earth
Member since Jan 2009
11542 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 3:50 pm to
He won a National Title pretty darn quickly at LSU, and he recruited the talent to win another in 2007. That is pretty darn close. Had he stayed, he would have won more. There is no doubt in my mind. The LSU program was pretty bad when Saban came along.
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram