- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chris Peterson to Miss. St.
Posted on 12/5/08 at 6:13 pm to Prominentwon
Posted on 12/5/08 at 6:13 pm to Prominentwon
BAD career move!
Posted on 12/5/08 at 6:18 pm to Baloo
I don't understand this at all. As horrible as Washington is right now, The Washington job is way >>>>>>>>> than MSU job. Hell Boise St might be >>>>>>MSU at this point
Posted on 12/5/08 at 6:21 pm to usc6158
quote:
I don't understand this at all. As horrible as Washington is right now, The Washington job is way >>>>>>>>> than MSU job. Hell Boise St might be >>>>>>MSU at this point
and seattle >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> starkville, mississippi
i think he ends up staying at boise
Posted on 12/5/08 at 6:26 pm to usc6158
I would say obviously the conference has something to do with it, but I get your point.
Croom got coach of the year recently at Miss. St.
The expectation level is reasonable and with some quality wins, could be a stepping stone.
Wash. and Wash. St. are on a path to nowhere, and a .500 season wouldn't carry a lick of weight on the national scene.
You can't really tell me the lowest PAC team is equivalent to the lowest SEC team, can you?
Croom got coach of the year recently at Miss. St.
The expectation level is reasonable and with some quality wins, could be a stepping stone.
Wash. and Wash. St. are on a path to nowhere, and a .500 season wouldn't carry a lick of weight on the national scene.
You can't really tell me the lowest PAC team is equivalent to the lowest SEC team, can you?
Posted on 12/5/08 at 6:33 pm to wahoocs
quote:
You can't really tell me the lowest PAC team is equivalent to the lowest SEC team, can you?
Historically, Washington is way better than MSU. Being in the SEC doesn't mean MSU doesn't suck. Washington has much less competition than does MSU. It's also much easier to recruit to Washington than MSU
This post was edited on 12/5/08 at 6:46 pm
Posted on 12/5/08 at 6:39 pm to usc6158
Washington has less competition than Washington?
OK.
I actually think recruiting in the South is better than the Northwest.
Washington is definitely better historically, but so is the PAC-10.
Washington will no doubt have less competition for athletes, but LA and MS (esp. LA) has the most NFL athletes per capita.
I'm just playing Devil's Advocate. I get your point, and the move would be surprising to me, but when the Mountain West beat's your conference 6-1, maybe it's time for a wake up call.
OK.
I actually think recruiting in the South is better than the Northwest.
Washington is definitely better historically, but so is the PAC-10.
Washington will no doubt have less competition for athletes, but LA and MS (esp. LA) has the most NFL athletes per capita.
I'm just playing Devil's Advocate. I get your point, and the move would be surprising to me, but when the Mountain West beat's your conference 6-1, maybe it's time for a wake up call.
Posted on 12/5/08 at 6:50 pm to wahoocs
quote:
I actually think recruiting in the South is better than the Northwest.
It is, but MSU gets everyone's leftovers in the SEC
Washington has outrecruited MSU by a fair amount over the past 5 years based on star ratings
Posted on 12/5/08 at 6:51 pm to PrattLSU
This would suck because he is a hell of a coach. His teams are always very disciplined!
Posted on 12/5/08 at 6:57 pm to Luke4LSU
quote:
Of course, I don't have to live in Boise fricking Idaho, so it's easy for me to say.
You and anybody else blasting Boise obviously don't know shite. Boise is usually in just about any ranking of the most desirable places to live.
Posted on 12/5/08 at 7:09 pm to usc6158
Even if he doesn't want the U-Dub job his team should be stacked next year. Chill for another year, maybe make a BCS bowl, then leave.
Posted on 12/5/08 at 7:39 pm to usc6158
quote:
Historically, Washington is way better than MSU. Being in the SEC doesn't mean MSU doesn't suck. Washington has much less competition than does MSU. It's also much easier to recruit to Washington than MSU
how so
you have a MISERABLE recruiting base up there
Posted on 12/5/08 at 7:40 pm to Ron Mexico
quote:
you have a MISERABLE recruiting base up there
Washington still pulls a lot of players from California. Look at the recruiting rankings. Even as they have been abysmal, Washington's recuriting hasn't been that bad and better than MSU's has been.
Posted on 12/5/08 at 9:25 pm to Rollie Fingers
so, the gay fist pump is coming to the SEC?
Posted on 12/6/08 at 10:47 pm to wahoocs
quote:
You can't really tell me the lowest PAC team is equivalent to the lowest SEC team, can you?
Washington has actually competed for National Championships. They won it all in 1991. They were PAC-10 co-champs as recently as 2000, and their overall w/l record is not that much different from LSU's. They are not a perennial doormat a la Mississippi State. Washington is head-and-shoulders above MSU, but their last two coaching hires, Gilbertson and Willingham, have proven to be absolute disasters.
This post was edited on 12/6/08 at 10:56 pm
Posted on 12/6/08 at 10:55 pm to Ron Mexico
The only reason i could see him coming to Starkvegas is if he wants to go to a place where the expectations are not very high and build them up and continue to get his name out as a coach to take over a " high profile " job later on.
Posted on 12/6/08 at 11:10 pm to Derby Tigah
quote:
so, the gay fist pump is coming to the SEC?
I was hoping for the modified Robot dance
Popular
Back to top

0





