Ryan Clark Says Matt Canada's Offense Is For "Inferior Talent"

Well if that is his take then the offense should be working at LSU since we have inferior offensive talent.

One of the worst takes I’ve ever heard.

That just sounds retarded to me. How the frick can "inferior talent go and win at Clemson" but can't beat fricking Troy. Just another O lover who can't admit he was wrong in pushing for him to get the job.

Ryan was one of the voices last year about how great O was and how he deserved the job and blah blah blah...No thanks on your opinion again Mr. Clark !

Dumbest hot take ever. There isn't an offense anywhere that works worse with better talent.

This is really not a brain teaser fellas When you have a strong O line, fast powerful running backs, and tight ends that know how to block you run the ball down their throats until the opponent can stop you. When you have a smaller line, great receivers, and an accurate fast QB you run an air raid with five and dime gain offense like Texas Tech When you have neither you try more misdirection, varied cadence, and specialty plays to gain advantage on your opponent like Boise. You play to your strengths and against your opponents weaknesses. The amount of motion, varied sets and formations, misdirection Canada uses is typically seen by teams with inferior talent to gain an advantage. That does not mean it wont work with more talented players but those plays do usually require more cerebral capabilities.

I thought all of his motion was to create a matchup favorable to our offense. The only thing we seem to do is motion a guy back and forth, only to run the same play: A trap running play that gets blown up in the backfield.

I agree, all the motion and shifts is meant to trick the defense. When you have good talent just line up and make it happen. offense was way better last year with doing that, just look at the numbers.

Just because they dress these ex players up and put them on TV doesn't mean they always know what they're talking about. This is a prime example.

I thought the new mantra was that we have no talent.

Clark suggested that Canada's offense is meant for "inferior talent so it can go to Clemson and win a game," like what Pitt did last year against the eventual National Champions. WTF? Someone is going to have to help me with this one.

Well, we should fare well against Bama, then. We must not have inferior talent to MSU.

LSU talent cannot run it though

Well Clemson beat Bama this decade

This offense is easy to defend. Send pressure up the middle, set the edge and play bump and run on the outside, so the shifts and motions are pretty much useless. Defenses aren't confused by his offense anymore, his tape is out. So what I get from Ryan is at what point does lsu with all theses great athletes, just line up and dominate. Lsu advantage this year is receiver. Unless these receivers are doubled, their always open. At 6'6, 6'4, and 6'3 with speed there's an automatic physical advantage. There's absolutely no reason why lsu can't go with Chark, Davis, and Sullivan with moreau or pettigrew with guice and Williams and run uptempo. Other than byu, Etling had looked his best in the 2 minute offense. He could fine the open guy easily, wasn't pressured just to throw on third down,and it gave different him different routes to throw.

Canada is one dumb frick.

I'm not prepared to say that however insisted on D. Etling is suicide for LSU. Mister Brennan was not the only QB to throw a (game finishing) interception late in the 4rth quarter.

Sounds like a perfect match for our stain offense

It's ok buddy good try! O appreciates the gesture it just didn't make any sense! You might can be a secondary coach for him at his next stop though. Sclsu with farmer Fran.

Wat