Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:134
Registered on:6/15/2012
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Weagle99 $50-$75 is what you’re supposed to tip.

re: PP7 has requested a trade

Posted by tigerfan337 on 10/22/18 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

??????


Exactly!

re: PP7 has requested a trade

Posted by tigerfan337 on 10/22/18 at 2:50 pm to
Hopefully the Saints organization has forgotten where PP7 went to college and will make this happen.
Massive line of trees cleared on both sides of i-12.
On the i-12 east bound side I’m speculating they’re clearing trees for an exit on hwy 1085.
The trees cleared on the west bound side of i-12 is a little closer to the St. Tammany - Tangipahoa parish line.

Anyone know what this is all about?
WR: K. Allen, A. Cooper, Corey Davis, Robby Anderson
RB: S. Barkley, R. Freeman, R. Burkhead, N. Chubb
TE: J. Doyle
PPR league. Guy is offering me Bell for Ingram.
I do not have Kamara or James Connor.
I’m leaning towards keeping Ingram.
Thoughts?
If you enter a country that ends in -stan you’re gonna have a bad time.

re: ESPN FPI: LSU 2018

Posted by tigerfan337 on 7/20/18 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

quote:
- We don’t have a QB
- We don’t have a RB
- Our receivers are avg at best
- Our O line is avg/below avg


All of these are false. We absolutely have talent at all of these positions


Yeah, you’re drinking the koolaid and have your purple and gold shades on. You know how I know?
quote:

In fact, we have more talent than every team at these positions we face this year except 2 teams. Bama and UGA.



So we have more talent at QB, RB, WR AND O Line than every other team we plays this year besides Georgia and Bama...
Lmao

re: ESPN FPI: LSU 2018

Posted by tigerfan337 on 7/20/18 at 9:06 am to
Will get berated by delusional LSU fans for this but here’s my prediction for 2018 season:

Miami - L
SE Louisiana - W
at Auburn - L
LA Tech - W
Ole Miss - W
at Florida - L
Georgia - L
Mississippi St - W
Alabama - L
at Arkansas - L
Rice - W
at Texas A&M - W

6-6 and could easily see that turning into 5-7.
Hope I’m wrong but just being realistic here.

- O is not a good head coach. I liked him as a d line coach and recruiter but he chokes under pressure as head coach.
I predict there will be multiple times where he will face criticism this year and completely throw others under the bus.
- Ensminger has not been a full time OC for 20 years
- We don’t have a QB
- We don’t have a RB
- Our receivers are avg at best
- Our O line is avg/below avg
+ Only bright spot will be our defense

LSU needs to clean house after this year.
- President F. King Alexander
- AD Joe Alleva
- Ed O
- Ensminger
All of them need to go.
quote:

Okay. What holdings should be different between them? I mean, they are identical for a reason. Why would the 2045 fund need to be in a different index fund than the 2065 one? I'm not understanding your argument here.

This is a whole other can of worms I’d rather not open, but in short - the 2045 should have more to it than just 4 funds. Could also make the argument that 2065 only needs two, but don’t want to get into all this...

quote:

you are basically arguing that the problem you have with the funds is that they help solve a problem that they are designed to help solve.

I think it’s great that it’s helping people get started but I’m arguing that the name is misleading. People need to know what they’re getting themselves into. Calling something a Target does not have the same connotation as Basic Investing or Simple Investing which is what it truly is.
The extent of what many people know about these funds ends at the name of the fund. They don’t know anything else about it and that’s a problem whether they realize it or not.

Risk comes from not knowing what you’re doing, and Warren Buffet said that.
quote:

You've yet to answer why 2045 and 2065 shouldn't both be 90/10 right now. Unless you and I just have a completely different opinion on what asset allocation means.


My fault, I should have clarified that. The 90/10 allocation is fine. It’s the fact that the holdings are almost identical to one another.

If you recall, a poster on here stated that “the tgt date funds are fine and unless you’re going to start paying attention to daily domestic and intl. market fluctuations then you’re better off keeping your money in a tgt retirement fund.” That’s simply just not true.
You do not have to become a CFA to know how aggressive/conservative and pick appropriate investments OR pick up the phone and call the company where your investments are and ask what their recommendation is based on your preferences. It just takes a little time and effort. Which isn’t asking much considering this is your retirement money. But if you don’t want to do that, then the easy way (lazy way imo) is to just stick with the tgt retirement fund.

But I think what my main problem with the tgt retirement funds is that the name is misleading. People get into these funds because they’re able to assimilate to the name “Target Retirement Fund 20XX”
They know how old they want to be when they retire and then they pick that fund, and that’s the extent of their retirement planning.
-They know nothing else about the fund.
-They don’t know what it’s invested in, they don’t even know if it’s invested in the stock market or what mutual funds are in the fund
-They don’t know if it’s as aggressive/conservative as they are

People just pick the fund because of the name and that’s it. They’re done. No more need to worry about retirement. They can now sweep it under the rug and not think about it for a long time.
The name of the funds were named what they are to get people to invest in the funds. More money in the funds = more money for the fund company.
“Target Retirement Fund 20XX ” sounds a lot more appealing to potential investors than “Basic Investing Retirement Fund 20XX” even though Basic Investing is a more appropriate name, because that’s what it is - basic (cookie cutter imo).
quote:

That's fine, but that has nothing to do with your last post on asset allocation

You asked
quote:

What should the allocations of both be?

I answered your question explaining why I don’t think the 2045 - 2065 funds should be almost identical to each other.

quote:

but acting like that is why they are bad is just silly.

Don’t put words in my mouth. I never said they were bad. Since my first post on this topic I have stated that they are too simple and a cookie cutter fund for your retirement money. Some people might be ok with that now but in hindsight I’m sure many wish they would’ve done more throughout their career to grow their nest egg.

Sure, it’s easily better than doing nothing and “they’re not going to hurt anybody” but damn what a high bar you’re setting for yourself when this is your retirement money that you’re going to have to live on.

The entire name “Taget Retirement Fund” creates a false sense of security. Basically - if you’re putting your money in there then you’re all set for retirement. Sorry but it’s not the end-all-be-all, as convenient as it may be.
I’d bet there are millions of people that have no idea what their tgt retirement fund is even invested in. I’m not even talking about the stocks in the mutual funds, I’m talking about the underlying funds in the tgt retirement fund. That, in my opinion, is a problem and is just plain lazy.

Sure they are a good way to get started and if you’re in a time crunch situation where you need to pick a fund(s) in your 401k/IRA and you don’t know jack shite about any of the funds then go with a tgt retirement fund, but after that maybe educate yourself a little more and learn what’s more appropriate for you.
You may want to be more aggressive or more conservative than what the fund indicates - they’re solely basing your risk tolerance on your age.
Or you may want to be more diverse, especially as your assets grow and you don’t want to have all of your money allocated in just 4 extremely broad funds.
I think the fund allocation is too simplistic and it should be more sophisticated as your nest egg grows and you get closer and closer to retirement. It also assumes your risk tolerance based only on your age.
The only asset allocation Vangurd does with these tgt retirement funds is they merely adjust the % of the funds as time goes on.

Simply owning 4 funds within the tgt retirement fund:
2 equity funds
- US broad mkt index equity index fund
- Intl. broad mkt equity index fund
2 bonds funds
- US bond mkt index fund
- Intl. bond fund index fund

Is a lackadaisical way to invest for retirement in my opinion.
Someone retiring in 2045 should not have the same asset allocation as someone retiring in 2065, that’s just asinine.
I’d argue that these funds are too simplistic.
Again, they’re great if you don’t want to put any effort at all but I feel like that’s a pretty lazy approach to investing considering this is your retirement money we’re talking about.

Take the tgt retirement fund 2055 for example: VFFVX
2055 is over 35 years away so why allocate 3% to an international bond fund and 7% to the total bond mkt index? Seems like a wasted opportunity for growth if you ask me.

Also, compare any vanguard tgt retirement fund’s asset allocation from 2045 to 2065.
2045, 2050, 2055, 2060 and 2065 have almost identical asset allocation!

Oh and 90% of your holdings are in TWO mutual funds. One is a broad market US equity index fund (VTSMX with +3,600 stocks) and one is a broad market international index fund (VGTSX with +6,000)!!! Whoop dee doo.
Cookie cutter.
Hmmm you may need to check your info.
There are zero Vanguard funds that have a .02% expense ratio.

And there are only two of the admiral share class funds have a .04% expense ratio.
Also, admiral share class = a $10,000 minimum investment, so I wouldn’t think a young investor would be starting in an admiral share class anyways.

Most of the investor share class Vangurd funds have an expense ratio between .12% - .20%
There are a handful of admiral share class funds that are between .06% - .08% and that’s it.

The tgt date retirement funds for Vanguard are not expensive, they are on par with the rest of their funds.... still wouldn’t recommend them though. But they aren’t expensive for young investors or anyone for that matter.
In order:
Lafayette
Ruston
Hammond
Monroe

re: Should I change my Roth IRA fund?

Posted by tigerfan337 on 7/18/18 at 12:27 pm to
Expensive?!? The Vanguard tgt funds are .15% per year. That’s almost nothing.

There are reasons I don’t like the tgt date retirement funds but expense is not one of them.
Second that.
The target date funds are about as cookie cutter as you can get. (Not just Vangurd but all of ‘em)

It’s just a fund of vanguard funds. You get the same 4-5 funds regardless of what target date year you pick and they just adjust the % allocations to each fund over time....

i.e.
Vanguard Tgt Retirement 2045: VTIVX
55% VTSMX - Total Stock Mkt Index
35% VGTSX - Total Intl. Stock Mkt Index
7% VBMFX - Total Bond Mkt Index
3% VTIBX - Total Intl. Bond Mkt Index

Vanguard Tgt Retirement 2065: VLXVX
54% VTSMX - Total Stock Mkt Index
36% VGTSX - Total Intl. Stock Mkt Index
7% VBMFX - Total Bond Mkt Index
3% VTIBX - Total Intl. Bond Mkt Index

Good for people that have absolutely no clue what they’re doing and prefer to be ignorant on investing but extremely too cookie cutter for me.
If you're too cheap to tip 20% then you're probably too cheap to be going out to eat. Unless the service sucks I'm always tipping at minimum 20%.

The difference between leaving 15% and 20% generally means a difference of $6 or less, and to the people serving you that 15% to 20% difference usually means a whole helluva lot more to them than the extra $1-$6 dollars to you.

That's their job, livelihood, way they get by for school, whatever it is their reason they are working for tips. And don't fault them because you disagree with the American tip system. It's not their fault so don't be a cheap arse, it's probably less than $6 anyways.

re: OT Opinions on Hammond?

Posted by tigerfan337 on 6/22/18 at 1:17 pm to
Proximity there is ideal. You can get to BR or NOLA in 45 min - 1 hr. and only about a 3 hr drive to the gulf coast.
The downtown area is really nice. Lot of restaurants, bars and places to shop around.
Good, safe neighborhoods.
Great place to raise a family if you're going the private school route. Wouldn't recommend if you're planning to send your kids to public school.