- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Snorlax
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | Space |
| Biography: | Alien |
| Interests: | Space |
| Occupation: | Alien |
| Number of Posts: | 8 |
| Registered on: | 5/17/2012 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
Code III: No redhibition question; Question 2 with those fricked up hypos, especially the one about sacks of flour. Code III examiner is a dick.
Torts: Question 1 had 5 subparts, 4/5 of those subparts were fricking negligence analyses; I believe question 3 had another negligence analysis. What is the point of testing negligence 5-6 times in one exam? Torts examiner is a fricking retard.
BE/NI: >50% was negotiable instruments. NI is such a worthless subject to know. Even in the Barbri books every other model answer starts out with something like "The examiner obviously doesn't know the law" / "This question doesn't make sense" / "This question is impossible to answer"
With the LBCA (I believe this was the 2nd exam that LBCA was testable) only having something like 7 points dedicated to LBCA. The BE/NI examiner needs to be replaced with someone competent.
Also, I've never understood why they give us an extra 30 minutes for Crim. where that extra time would be much more useful on something else like torts, code II, or code III. Crim. is by far the easiest / quickest exam to finish.
Also, that woman reading the instructions before every exam: "Write your fictitious first name....................Write your fictitious last name................................................................Write your exam number...........................................................................Turn the test over.......................
Torts: Question 1 had 5 subparts, 4/5 of those subparts were fricking negligence analyses; I believe question 3 had another negligence analysis. What is the point of testing negligence 5-6 times in one exam? Torts examiner is a fricking retard.
BE/NI: >50% was negotiable instruments. NI is such a worthless subject to know. Even in the Barbri books every other model answer starts out with something like "The examiner obviously doesn't know the law" / "This question doesn't make sense" / "This question is impossible to answer"
With the LBCA (I believe this was the 2nd exam that LBCA was testable) only having something like 7 points dedicated to LBCA. The BE/NI examiner needs to be replaced with someone competent.
Also, I've never understood why they give us an extra 30 minutes for Crim. where that extra time would be much more useful on something else like torts, code II, or code III. Crim. is by far the easiest / quickest exam to finish.
Also, that woman reading the instructions before every exam: "Write your fictitious first name....................Write your fictitious last name................................................................Write your exam number...........................................................................Turn the test over.......................
0
re: nevermind
Posted by Snorlax on 7/17/16 at 8:55 pm to mahdragonz
Were you expecting people to thank you / think you were saving the day by offering your unwanted (and incorrect) advice?
HURR DURR PAPER WORK
Autist.
HURR DURR PAPER WORK
Autist.
re: why is jarred salsa so terrible?
Posted by Snorlax on 3/10/16 at 2:54 pm to Honky Lips
re: Del Porto on the Northshore- Most underrated in LA? W/Review
Posted by Snorlax on 5/8/15 at 4:12 pm to Lester Earl
No. From what I have had there, I wouldn't be surprised if you had to peel the plastic film off yourself.
re: Del Porto on the Northshore- Most underrated in LA? W/Review
Posted by Snorlax on 5/8/15 at 2:14 pm to Oenophile Brah
quote:
No, I always find it funny when people call others snobs. You use it to slander me, but your usage tells me more about you. Call me a snob, I don't give a shite
I never called you a snob. But, your assumption really shows your insecurities.
Del Porto - White Bean Purée, $14.95 (can of blue runner white beans + CVS olive oil + $0.69 can of black olives + blended together in a Nutri-Bullet)
Covington Upper Echelon -LINK
re: Del Porto on the Northshore- Most underrated in LA? W/Review
Posted by Snorlax on 5/8/15 at 1:22 pm to Oenophile Brah
quote:
Which Italian places are better in NOLA?
Vincent's, Domenica, etc.
Del Porto has been struggling ever since Ox Lot 9 has opened. Better hurry up and get some of the most 'underrated' food while it lasts.
quote:
The ease with which you throw snob around makes me sad for you. Sorry you're insecure.
Hit a little too close to home for you?
EDIT: While Del Porto's food is not terrible, for the quality / portion-size / consistency compared with the price, it leaves much to be sought after.
re: Del Porto on the Northshore- Most underrated in LA? W/Review
Posted by Snorlax on 5/8/15 at 12:46 pm to Oenophile Brah
quote:
Ok, I submit that Del Porto is the most underrated restaurant in LA.
No. Plenty of snobs rant and rave about this place.
quote:
can compete with any Italian restaurant in NOLA.
No.
quote:
It's better than most.
No. Just no.
Popular
75
