Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:76
Registered on:10/21/2004
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Last I saw, MGM is giving the Cajuns 9.5. That may be a good bet boys. Word in Austin, they don't have a quarterback coming forward. Plus the receiver corp is weak.
quote:

So then you would consider evaluating the perception of last year as not being near a title? They finished above ND which actually did play for one. Under your perception model this perception isn’t valid but the perceptions of 10 years ago are? So my question remains.


Last year they were in the hunt. They didn't win a division, Conference or Natty. They come within the same this year *edited from last year* they are trending , then they are in the conversation of not being overrated. Just like Ark around 2011. They lost to the 1 & 2 team in the nation that year. Good year but not great.

quote:

My next question is do you think the playoff committee will snub the Aggies twice?


Depends on who they lost to and by how much. We are all vulnerable to being snubbed by the ND biased (another overrated program). But if Jimbo is in the conversation again, then A&M will be looked as a legit powerhouse. However, the only way that it will be viewed as a snub is if you win the West and lose to the East in the Championship game. Bama snuck in because they are Bama.
[img]As a statistician, what is this period. How many games won?[/img]

LOL, now you are discussing a often debated area about sample size so touché my friend. Typically around 20 is a good sample size, but with Bayesian you cant go that far because so much changes so quickly. From a personal point, I would have to say you should be in the hunt for a championship (no matter how small) for at least 3 years. Ex. You lose just to Alabama for those three years. Or you break through.
quote:

I agree with some of this. Data more than 3 years ago is irrelevant and actually many times opposed to betting odds. So your system is opposed to itself.


Not at all, the case. You gather probabilities on past evidence. Thats Bayesian! There are externalities that play a factor in those probabilities more than just three years or the current football staff. Look at Texas, they are seen as underachieving because of their past. I think that is your issue in this. You are seeing only three years when everyone else is seeing a decade of evidence. Same with GA. For years both teams have been saying they are a top tier team but have very little to prove it. Every year people look at their recruiting, but nothing to show. A&M's best shots where with Manziel and a STOUT offensive line. Nothing. Last year you had a great defense and the most experienced QB in the league. Last year was your year. Nothing. Until you show that you can win something, a la LSU 2003, the betting odds are that you won't. Even with the talent you have. You won't.

There is your answer, win a Championship with your talent and highly priced coach. Until then, you are the same Texas A & M from the last 10 years. Maybe its culture, facilities, location, or the fact that some athletes cant get attendance. All of which play a factor.
quote:

Anyone who's saying Aggy is overrated is just trolling the shite out our ya'll because it's just good sport.


Nah, I am looking at historical records and betting odds. They have one 10 win season in the last 9. They should be better than that, they were recruiting Texas solely on being an SEC team. Look it up, the recruiting pamphlet has SEC bigger than the A&M logo. The whole program is overrated as LSU was before the 2000s. Good seasons don't make great programs. Great seasons makes great programs. I see Fisher , who I think is overrated and overpaid, trying to drum up hype because lets be honest, if that the best they get he is on the hottest. A&M will always be a fraud until they prove it over quite a few years. Even Arkansas was able to put multiple seasons together under BP.
quote:

If they do a repeat of last year this year, are they still overrated then?

Because neither out come is certain. On one hand last year seems like an anomaly but in the other there are reasons for said outcome (new coach and such).

I’m just wondering what trend of data influences this opinion? Two 1 loss season. Three? Four?

Or is this an opinion that will never be fairly evaluated on recent data?


Well its the case of Bayesian Probability. Your coach and fan base talk about how y'all are going to win a national championship, "Beat Alabama's arse" per Jimbo, and exaggerate your seasons accomplishments. For instance, last year. Y'all think y'all had an amazing season! Y'all beat Vandy by 5, didn't even get a sip of Gatorade before you lost to Bama, pulled an upset of Fla you should have lost like LSU., and beat the dumpster fire that was LSU last year. It was a good season yes. But you showed all season that you were very vulnerable and if you played a decent team you would lose. Thats overrated. Every fall, you start the season playing next to no one. Like this year. You should be undefeated by the time you get to Bama. Your team will barely make it through the first games, make Colorado fans believe they have a have decent team, etc. But the networks will give you a top 10 rating. You will lose 3 games this year, bank on it. Jimbo is overrated (look at FSU after you lose an NFL QB, WR, RB, S, etc.). And before you talk about Coach O, just remember you started the thread about A&M being overrated, not LSU or Coach O. The verdict is this year for Coach O.

I digress about Bayesian Probability. Its the probability of what you perceive should happen. Every year, your team's fanbase, coaches and sometimes the polls, put up high expectations of winning probability. Others, change the perception of this and start noticing you and rate you has a potential great team. Your team flounders and fails when they shouldn't to teams that are underrated. So at the beginning of every season until September, people think a lot of you when really you are just a middle of the road SEC team (look at your past SEC records). Until you break through, you don't deserve to be considered over GA (also traditionally overrated but wins divisions), Auburn, Florida, or LSU. You are the 3/4/5 best team in the West.

LSU is different, you win a Natty, your fan base always remembers that championship year. To me, I would rather go winless for 9 years and win a championship 1. GA and A&M, your fans don't have that year. Until you do, you are at best a gate keeper. Thus being overrated. When something or at least be in the conversation for more than one year and you will meet expectations.

Just the opinion of a statistician.
quote:

Tier 1:

Alabama
Florida
Georgia
A&M

Tier 2

LSU
Auburn


2019 LSU wins conference and natty ; " flash in the pan, they are tier 2", 2020 A&M has better conference record than LSU for the first time and wins nothing, "Bama needs to look over their shoulder these guys are coming!". Holy geez. You are the economist that every third world country needs.
Ill say this. Coming from Louisiana and moving to Austin, LA is out. Austin/Texas is great with brisket, never had St. Louis or Memphis BBQ, love the sauce in the Carolinas, loved Woodrows and The Shed. Cant wait to see everyone else opinion.
SEC Shorts from December 2019

LINK
yeah, Dad is a basketball coach and gets fired from school. Dad gets salty and gets his son to leave them for his senior year. Dad shops him around and they find HHS. So the dad and son rent an apartment near HHS so the dad can be an assistant coach and the kid can go to HHS. LHSAA rule is that your sole residence has to be in district to be immediately eligible. Their house in Houma as been "on sale" for a while and no one wants to buy it. Coincidentally, the mom and younger brother still live in the house and the younger brother goes to the elementary that feeds to the original high school. I guess it would be okay to pull the younger brother out of school mid-year if they sell the house. Because of this the LHSAA says he has to sit out a year. If he would have went to the local public school, he would have been eligible.

re: Dr. Josh Eachus

Posted by thetruth on 1/12/18 at 8:24 am to
quote:

I remember my first blow job


Did you spit or swallow?

re: Houma prostitute line up

Posted by thetruth on 5/14/15 at 11:03 am to
Looks like the graveyard shift of any Waffle House on the Alabama/Florida border.
Either a celtic replica jersey or a t shirt that resembles the jersey, checked the MOL and Dicks
Im going with Kieland Williams Calves!

re: SABAN'S LAST SEASON AT LSU

Posted by thetruth on 1/10/10 at 1:08 pm to
Its funny, because I lived in DC then and watched the game with auburn, ga and other sec fans in crystal city. They all said after the season that man you guys had a bad season. Face it man, miles is not living up to what you wanted when he was hired.
he was a good corner, but was he that good?
LINK
I know, when was the last time bama was undefeated this late in the season?

Perhaps, 2005 with Shula as the coach. At least we are not hearing any rumbles this year about winning with another coaches talent. How quickly the bammers forget.