Favorite team:LSU 
Location:St. Petersburg, FL
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:330
Registered on:10/20/2024
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
The only way to fix it is to get rid of all the shitty bowls that no one cares about (there are 36 total non-playoff bowl games) and make it actually mean something to get invited through financial incentive, extra practice, etc.

No one cares who is playing in the Rate Bowl or the Gasparilla Bowl
This is quite refreshing to see from the head coach compared to his predecessor. Dude is a grinder for sure.

On an unrelated note, I used to hate when Ponamsky would post stuff like this when he was pencil pushing for O. "Mornin' everybody!!" Dude thought he was hot stuff.


Look I hate Bama as much as the next guy, but they should absolutely be in.

They beat UGA in their house on the road. It would be different if they had already lost to them.

And you’ll just allow ND and Miami to get a pass because they don’t have to play in a conference championship? You shouldn’t be penalized for having to play an e tra game.

We would be pissed if that was us and the committee left us out. Also going 11-1 in the Big 12 < going 10-2 in the SEC. BYU had the shite kicked out of them twice by the same team. They don’t deserve to be in.
You could say that about any team. We could be 11-1 with BK still as our coach, but we’re not. It’s because we are not a good team.

Arkansas is 2-10 because they are not a good team. Find ways to lose.

re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 12/5/25 at 12:42 pm to
Yeah man!!! We’ll be like you and suck Baker off for those dominating defensive performances against the vaunted offenses of Tech, Southeastern, Western Kentucky, Florida, SC, 91st-ranked Oklahoma and 2-10 Arkansas.

frick the 3-4 games a year that actually matter!

re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 12/5/25 at 12:37 pm to
Sure, we held Ole Miss to their lowest point total. So did fricking Washington State. Who sucks arse. What’s your point?? UGA got stops when it mattered and shut them down in the fourth. Maybe if Ole Miss had played teams in the top half of the conference it would be different.

The fact that Vanderbilt was scoring every possession and you said “doesn’t matter” lmfao.

They were going to score 38. Ole Miss could’ve easily scored 38 if not for the lucky fumble right before the goal line. Both teams would’ve punched it in at the end.

Kind of hard for the offense when you immediately give up two straight TDs to open the game on back to back drives against Vandy and A&M.

re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 12/5/25 at 12:28 pm to
You mean that OU team that almost lost to us when we had 17 yards passing through 3 quarters because neither team has a competent offense? Yeah.

I’m sure they’ll make a run in the playoffs.

re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 12/5/25 at 12:11 pm to
Bro if you think Ole Miss has had a tough schedule just based off of what some subjective metric from ESPN spews out based off of the actual records of the teams, that completely invalidates any point you have tried to make :lol:

You know nothing if that is the case.

re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 12/5/25 at 12:09 pm to
Guess that's why we're paying Baker the big bucks as one of the best DCs in the country. To not get stops when it matters against against Vanderbilt, who is 6th-7th best team in the conference. And hold them to their third lowest scoring total of the season.

Glad we're really setting the standard.

re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 12/5/25 at 12:06 pm to
If y'all want to glaze Baker for the Ole Miss performance be my guest.

The guy was going to score for Ole Miss at the end to make it 31 and went down to run out the clock. Sure, we got a fumble into the endzone after we allowed them to go right down the field in 5 plays. Was that good defense or just luck?

I already told you Ole Miss is fool's gold bro. Try to keep up. They haven't played anyone this season.

We would still have BK as our coach if we swapped out Vandy and A&M for Kentucky and Miss. State.
I leave out Arkansas because they have won 2 games all year and are winless in conference. I don't know if that would necessarily be the feather in Baker's cap when talking about opposing offenses they have stopped.

UGA is a very good team. Oklahoma is not a good team. They have a good defense but Mateer and their offense is going to hinder any chance they have in the playoffs.

We had 17 yards passing through 3 quarters against them and still held a lead late into the 4th. They were lucky.

re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 12/5/25 at 11:15 am to
quote:

No stupid. I looked at our season as a whole, not picking and choosing which games to focus on. Again, teh literal opposite of what you are doing.


Buddy, you obviously didn't because you refuse to acknowledge how shitty the offenses were on the other schedule. A quarter of the teams we played had offenses ranked 86 or worse. WTF are you talking about?

quote:

I've argued points the whole thread. You ignore them then go off on rambling nonsense.


Again with the deflecting. "I ARGUE POINTS AND NOT RAMBLE!!" (fails to make a single point)

quote:

Do you think the defense played great against any good offensive competition this season? If so, who?


Wow, we have a little substance here finally!! So you think the defense played well against Vanderbilt when this was their drive chart:

TD
TD
Downs
FG
TD
TD
Punt
Punt
End of game drive where they were on our 1-yard line and held it for 3:00 and would've punched it in.

Got 3 stops all game. Offense didn't even play as bad as they have most of the season in this game.

Defense played great first two drives against Ole Miss. After that, they let them march all up and down the field. After that it was,

FG
Punt
Fumble (would've been a score)-but OM went right down the field and made our D look like Swiss cheese.
TD
TD
Punt
INT
TD
End of game where they couldn't get a stop and OM was in the red zone.

Both teams converted 50% of their third downs.


re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 12/5/25 at 11:05 am to
You do realize that Ole Miss played us, Florida, Kentucky, Arkansas, Miss. State, South Carolina in conference and that they are a combined 9-39 in SEC games, right?

Add that they played Georgia State, Tulane, the Citadel and Washington State out of conference and it ain't that difficult of a schedule to where 24 is the baseline.

re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 12/5/25 at 11:00 am to
quote:

I'm doing the literal opposite by looking at the entirety of the season.


So a creatively semantic way of saying "I am just focused on all the bad teams we played well against the majority of the season and none of the good teams that the defense played poorly against in games that mattered. And BTW, this means I am not cherry picking because I say so"

Got it. Thanks for clarifying.

quote:

Not once did I do that.


You're doing that now. All you're doing is looking at the other games on the schedule against teams that have offenses as bad as ours. Tech is 86th in offense, Oklahoma is 91st, South Carolina and Florida are in the 100s.

WKU is 49th but isn't a serious team. Neither is SELU.

I understand that you play who is on the schedule and Baker can't help that, but at least provide some context for what you're arguing against.

MAYBE. Just maybe, the defensive stats are skewed a little bit based off of the teams we have played??

quote:

How drunk are you at the moment?


You love deflecting and not arguing any points. You've provided no insight to any argument other than "You're cherry picking" or "Baker is good and you're wrong" and then adding emojis.

Do you think the defense played great against any good offensive competition this season? If so, who?
The defense was not the problem in the Ole Miss game, but they looked unprepared and outmatched.

I saw them not be able to get off the field when it mattered. They had multiple opportunities to help themselves and didn't do it. Especially with some stupid penalties that kept drives alive. I saw them allow Ole Miss to convert 50% of their third downs and go 2/2 on 4th down.

Outside of the first two drives of the game, I saw them march down the field at will pretty much even with the fumble right before he goes into the end zone.

Is that fumble considered a stop? Sure, but the defense was Swiss cheese on that drive. Completions of 23, 16, 32.

Guys are running wide open.

re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 12/5/25 at 10:39 am to
quote:

Your whole premise for this thread is cherrypicking 3 games and completely ignoring anything else


You're doing the exact same thing boss man.

You're cherry picking games against awful offenses in Tech, SELU, WKU, Florida, South Carolina to showcase why the defense is so good, but ignoring how they have played against teams that actually have a good offense.

quote:

You are just rambling to ignore the valid points several have made in this thread because you refuse to admit Baker fielded a great defense this year.


I answered your question. Not sure you know what a ramble is either. Those teams are better than the three that you asked me about. The fact that you didn't argue against it leads me to believe that you think the same. :lol:

re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 12/5/25 at 10:34 am to
You mean making an excuse for a defense that played well against an offense currently in the top 10 in both points per game and total yards that's actually won multiple conference games and is a notoriously tough place to play on the road?? You betcha!
I don't know if you watched that game but OU had a sack fumble for a TD, two INTs that led to FGs right before the half, and they were just playing the prevent defense at the end of the game when they were up by 9 with less than 2:00 left at 33-24.

Their defense won that game for them.

re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 12/5/25 at 10:19 am to
Not sure you know the definition of cherry picking :lol:

quote:

Which teams did better against those three that you continually cherry pick? You keep ducking this question almost as if you realize how stupid you are.


Thanks for the clarification, dipshit.

Of the teams they've played on their schedule, Notre Dame is better than A&M. Auburn sucks and should've beaten A&M. Held them to 16 points. Arkansas had a chance to beat A&M. Texas is better than A&M. Hell South Carolina was up by 28 on A&M. A&M is not a good team.

Alabama and Texas are better than Vanderbilt. Missouri could've beat them.

Ole Miss hasn't played anyone outside of Georgia this entire season my guy. I think OU is better than them. Arkansas and Kentucky almost knocked them off.

None of these teams are elite and all of them could go down. Plenty of teams outside the conference that are better.

re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 12/5/25 at 10:04 am to
Look my man, if y'all want to give Baker his flowers for showing up and playing well against Tech, WKU, Southeastern, SC, Florida and OU (all of which suck arse on offense) then have it. And throw in Arkansas with their two wins all season. That's more than half of the schedule FYI.

The glaze some of y'all have for Baker is next level, and I am simply just questioning how we have looked in some games against better competition is all.

re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 12/5/25 at 9:54 am to
Another dipshit argument by you. Not surprised at this point. The only way you know how to argue is to insult someone's intelligence, but really just makes you look like a retard in reality :lol: