Favorite team:LSU 
Location:St. Petersburg, FL
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:116
Registered on:10/20/2024
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
I guess guys like Mike Tomlin and Browns GM Andrew Berry are also racist for passing on Shedeur when they had the opportunity.

re: Has Jim Nantz lost it?

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 4/21/25 at 2:22 pm
There are very few that still have it. I still like Tirico and Joe Buck, but that's about it and I understand why some don't like them.

Mike Emrick on NBC for NHL will forever by the goat in my mind of play-by-play broadcasters. Al Michaels is also up there for me even though he is phoning it in with Amazon in his twilight years.

Nantz has always gotten on my nerves although a big part of that was because I couldn't stand Phil Simms.

The way people on TV talk about The Masters has become too reverent and too precious for me, and the full on glaze that Nantz has for Augusta makes me hate it (even though I bet it is an awesome experience in-person).

"You have to call the fans patrons and you can't use certain terms like in the rough" GFY.

His basketball play-by-play is about the only thing I can listen to him on.

The run game was atrocious and anyone that tells you otherwise didn't watch the games. Those numbers don't tell the true story. In all 4 of our losses, LSU had:

25 carries for 113 yards against USC (24 for 74 yards outside of Emery's 39 yard run). Basically 3 yards a carry excluding that run.

23 carries for 24 yards against A&M. A yard a carry in a game where you led the majority.

24 carries for 104 yards against Bama (23 for 45 yards outside of Durham's 45 yard run). 1.95 yards per carry excluding that run.

44 carries for 128 yards against Florida. 2.9 yard average.

Outside of 2 big runs that were outliers, those are abysmal running stats, and you could clearly tell that they were struggling to run even with Dellinger in the lineup.

Even against Ole Miss in a big win, we struggled to run the ball (Durham was the leading rusher with a whopping 37 yards).

It was a combination of the O-line not being able to run block and Sloan's predictable play calling (almost always a zone-read when you know Nuss isn't pulling the ball and taking it himself).

Outside of Bill Maher

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 4/15/25 at 2:36 pm
Is there anyone in the media on the left that is worth following or at least has an "insightful" opposing view that isn't completely unhinged?

I don't understand how anyone could ever vote for the Democratic Party in its current state, but I don't think its good to live in an echo chamber like the Dims, so I'm attempting to expand my horizons for lack of a better term.

Fareed Zakaria seems to be the closest I have found. He doesn't appear to be nearly as deranged as everyone else on CNN, and I am willing to at least listen to what he has to say even if I completely disagree.
It won't be a big deal only if they don't use it as a way to invoke some sort of a racial narrative, and unfortunately, I don't think they can help themselves.

Even though the character is an outcast and someone who was bullied partly because of their looks.

I can already see the think pieces from The Atlantic, NYT, Vox, etc.

"Is Snape's treatment in the new Harry Potter series an indictment on race in America?"
This is a total disaster. I'd be livid if I was Heupel. It's part of why Belichick hired Lombardi to be the GM at North Carolina to deal with all the NIL stuff since it's essentially contract negotiation so he can focus on football.

Even then, it's not enough to stop these guys from doing whatever the hell they want.

re: Does Barstool suck?

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 4/11/25 at 2:06 pm
It's basically Spittin' Chiclets, Gruden and Frank. That's about it.

Guys like KFC, Rico Bosco, Tommy Smokes, etc. all blow and I don't find it funny or amusing. Dave is fine but he gets on my nerves a lot.

re: Does Barstool suck?

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 4/11/25 at 1:58 pm
Neither was Billy Football or the "Blake" Koepka schtick

re: Does Barstool suck?

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 4/11/25 at 1:48 pm
Frank the Tank is the man. He is just a fat, loud idiot that is grumpy because his teams always choke. He is MILES funnier than 99.9% of the people at Barstool.

PMT always trying to be weird and quirky and saying blatantly stupid stuff stopped being funny a long time ago.

The Fantasy Football segment where they do the British accents may be the least funny thing I've ever heard in my life.

Does Barstool suck?

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 4/11/25 at 1:14 pm
Most of their personalities bring nothing to the table and are boring with the exceptions of Biz, Whit, Gruden and Frank the Tank.

Even the PMT guys and their schtick have gotten old.
Honestly, not the worst idea if they have no criminal background.

Ensure that they vote Republican at the next election and then watch the melt from the Dems.

re: Casey Rocket on Kill Tony

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 4/2/25 at 8:20 am
I agree 100%. I love Tony and I do think it's a cool idea and I'm happy it's taken off. Part of it is I'm expecting to die laughing every time and when I don't I get disappointed.

Some of the stuff is almost blatantly unfunny and when I see everyone hysterically laughing and Tony about to fall out of his chair, it makes me wonder what I'm missing.

Casey Rocket on Kill Tony

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 4/1/25 at 4:28 pm
Can someone please explain what this guy's appeal is? Any one could get up there and do what he is doing.

He literally just walks around like an idiot on stage and says random things like "Mary had a little LAMB" and then squats all of a sudden. People laugh and Tony is pissing himself he is laughing so hard.
Other than just sit there and nod his head?
Given how Democrats have acted since Obama became elected, there's not a whole lot that I would trust them on to begin with.

FWIW, all of these amendments seem very reasonable and I am all for anything that lowers taxes and helps our state become more business friendly, which is it looks like this legislation is doing. I thought the dumbed-down version of the amendments helped significantly.
Took this from the Secretary of State's office. This translates all the legal jargon. I would vote "Yes" for all 4 for sure. Especially No. 2. Not sure why anyone would be opposed to that.

Amendment 1: Do you support an amendment granting the Louisiana Supreme Court jurisdiction to discipline out of-state lawyers for unethical legal practices in the state of Louisiana, and to grant the legislature the authority to establish trial courts of limited and specialized jurisdiction?

Amendment 2: Do you support an amendment to revise Article VII of the Constitution of Louisiana including revisions to lower the maximum rate of income tax, increase income tax deductions for citizens over sixty-five, provide for a government growth limit, modify operation of certain constitutional funds, provide for property tax exemptions retaining the homestead exemption and exemption for religious organizations, provide a permanent teacher salary increase by requiring a surplus payment to teacher retirement debt, and make other modifications?

Amendment 3: Do you support an amendment to provide the legislature the authority to determine which felony crimes, when committed by a person under the age of seventeen, may be transferred for criminal prosecution as an adult?

Amendment 4: Do you support an amendment to provide for the use of the earliest election date to fill judicial vacancies?

re: LSU-Clemson kickoff time

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 3/18/25 at 4:07 pm
Since the game is in Columbus, I would imagine that is a Fox game. Just like it was a Fox game when Texas played in Ann Arbor earlier this year against Michigan at 11:00), and that was No.3 vs No. 10

DELETE

Posted by Sheriff Brackett on 2/28/25 at 9:12 am
(No Message)
Trump broke a lot of people, and it is truly astounding.
Initially, I thought he may be one of the voices on the left that I could at least respect because he did say some things that I agree with.

Then I listened to him on Theo Von's podcast, and one of the first things Scott talked about was hanging out with his own son on the couch and how his son would prop his legs up and rest them on his, and the way it was delivered, I just found it to be a weird thing to say about your son.

Then post election, he just totally has lost his mind. Doesn't help that he cohosts with Kara Swisher, who is also batshit.