poptart_1225

I found the show on Hulu and it comes on at 5:00pm CST on TLC. Not CBS.

quote:

---

1. No
2. Every vehicle involved in the crash will have a separate vehicle page where the configuration and other general info about the car is noted. So say vehicle 1 is a Ford fiesta.

A for passenger car, x for no trailer or cargo, 4 doors 2 axles 4 tires.

3. Sure?

---

THIS. But I still think more context is needed. Because if we knew the end result your trying to accomplish we can answer the questions accordingly. Those of us who know a bit about the LA Crash report system. But I can tell you that most if not all Officers fill out crash reports on a computer system these days. Very rarely will you still do a hand written crash report. Due to drawing out how the crash happened and narratives in it. Computers make it easier.

What people aren't understanding is there are legal loop holes that do allow police to enter a home with out a warrant. It sort of works off the premise of suspicion of a crime in progress and probable cause. Probable cause for a police officer is only 50% certainty that someone is committing a crime. And if probable cause is met then you can be arrested for whatever crime your being suspected of. BUT the extenuating circumstance in this incident which we don't know because we don't have the whole story is HOW exactly did the police make entry to the home? Is the question that should be asked. Because let's say they arrive at the house and the front door is wide open. Then it doesn't matter who called the police. It's reasonable to believe that a burglary is in progress. Or let's say they arrive and the door is shut but not locked. Then your treading deep water in shitty creek cause it would then rely on the police making entry through a shut door AND making their presence known. Which would or could allow the homeowner to get away with this with no charges. And finally let's say they arrived and the door was shut and locked and they made entry through a locked door then the homeowner is absolutely justified in his actions. So those are the questions we must ask and don't have the info on just yet. I prefer to wait till more information comes out before I make any judgment on who was right and who is wrong.

quote:

---

The soldier used his Glock to kill the first three Taliban he encountered, but when he went to shoot the fourth, his pistol jammed

---

Eh Idk about Glock jamming... or the fact a SAS Officer can't unjam it when it very rarely happens. You can Christmas tree a Glock which I've done before but most jams can be simply fixed with a tap, rack, bang. Not saying the story isn't true. And confined space he may have just thought the claw hammer was more efficient. But to say the pistol was inoperable due to jam Idk about...

I have a catahoula. Love the dog. He's very hyper. Lots of energy. But he's basically a 90lb. Lap dog and extremely protective! But overall one of the best breeds of dog I've ever owned.

quote:

---

Why can’t you just tell us what actually happened?

---

This ^ We need more info on said product or service... at this point I think you may have bought a bag of dicks maybe?

Every light in the house is on.
The backyard's bright as the crack of dawn.
The front walk looks like runway lights.
It's kinda like noon in the dead of night.
Every light in the house is on.
Just in case you ever do get tired of being gone.
Every light in the house is on.

quote:

---

Was that a hot dog being thrown at a light bulb?

---

That's what I thought too! Glad I wasn't the only one. Kinda like throwing a hot dog down the hallway saying...

quote:

---

I am sort of playing devil's advocate here, but if they failed protocol, can an argument be made from AS toxicology report, that because he was acting irrational, they had to break protocol? Having the substances that he had in him

---

BRPD's policy is wrote so grey that they can find you guilty of breaking it so very easily. Nothing in black and white.

What sucks is yes he may win a civil suit against the city for wrongful termination. But on the horizon is the civil suit against him from the Sterling family. I think it's garbage and he did nothing wrong to warrant being sued in civil court but the obligations to meet are less and unfortunately he has a bad chance on losing that battle. It sounds like he may rob Peter to pay Paul in this instance which is insanity.