AeroFan

Try Travelbyjen. 4 days, 5* Riviera Maya, all,inclusive, including air, for $600/person.

1 day is plenty. Take a cruise that includes a port of call at Key West. You can walk from one side of the island and back and stop off at a few of places along the way.

I haven't tried them, but Nicko river cruises seem to offer attractive pricing as low as 399 euros/person for 3 nights.

See the Kara and Nate episode about it on Youtube. I believe they walked it last year. It looks like fun.

Okay, here's the deal. Most people will crap all over your proposed itinerary because they don't like to travel that way. That's fine for them; to each their own, but they can't understand how someone might like to travel differently. So, you need someone who likes to cover a lot of territory in a single trip. I'm your man. Disclaimer: I've been to all those places except for Bergen and Helsinki. Here goes:


My first stab is this:

Night of 22nd: Fly into Copenhagen
23rd: Explore Copenhagen

I've been to Copenhagen a couple of time and walked around the city center both times. A day is enough, unless you want to go into museums or something. (We didn't go into Tivoli Gardens)

24th: Morning in Copenhagen-> Travel to Oslo

There's an 18-hour overnight ferry from Copenhagen to Oslo. I haven't done it, but it looks interesting.

25th: Explore Oslo or surrounding Fjords

There's not a lot to see in Oslo. I walked from downtown all the way outside of town in a couple of hours. A day is enough.

26th: Travel to Bergen early, see the surrounding fjords

If you like nature, you might want to see if you can work in a hike. If so, you may have to drop Bergen or Oslo. Hikes probably are more scenic near Bergen. We hiked Trolltunga, but positioning for that hike is time-consuming.

If the flight-times and fares are good, I'd consider starting the trip in Bergen or Oslo, instead of Copenhagen, and working east. You could take the ferry from Oslo to Copenhagen. Then you always could take a train from Copenhagen to Stockholm -- if fare and times are more favorable than a flight.


27th: Fly to Stockholm early, see the city

We did Stockholm in a day. That should be plenty.

Consider taking the overnight ferry from Stockholm to Tallin or Helsinki. If you take the ferry to Tallinn, then you could do a day trip from Tallinn to Helsinki, and have 2 nights in Tallinn. The ferry between Tallinn and Helsinki is only 2.5 hrs. long. A day in Helsinki should be plenty.

Take the bus from Tallinn to Riga. It only cost $5 or so when we went.

Spend the day and night in Riga, then bus to Vilnius.

Spend day and night in Vilnius, then head back to Germany.


Sounds like you have the makings of a great trip!

We've flown into NYC a few times to connect on separate tickets. We did it once with Norwegian and also with Norse. We usually stay the night in NYC before the connecting flight. The last time we did it, we flew into JFK late at night, and took a city bus to the subway, and then the PATH to NJ where our hotel was. However, for our Norwegian flight, we flew into LGA on Southwest and took a city bus over to JFK for the connection to Norse. If you're taking the first flight of the day out of ATL, there should be less chance for delays. Also, some travel insurance policies provide some coverage for missed connections. You could look into that, but be sure to read the fine print.

Right now MSY-MAD is $546/person rt economy fare for end of Oct., or even leaving as soon as Feb.-March. The fares are about the same from BTR and MLU. Comparable fares to DUB. In a few weeks, prices from MAD-Milan should drop to $44/person rt.

I booked ORD-MUC for $238rt for Christmas last week. Hopefully, Europe stays open.

And so it begins . . .

quote:

---

Then the ramifications:
- Allowed the greatest stateman of the 19th century to unify Germany
- Created the largest and most powerful country in Europe
- Set in motion the alliances that would lead to WW1, some of which changed after Bismarck died
- Would mark the peak of Bismarck’s power

---

Now, we're on to something. If by decisive, you mean most consequential, how about the battle for Belgium when Germany invaded Belgium in WWI in blind adherence to the Schlieffen Plan? Had Germany not invaded Belgium, then Britain likely stays out of the war, there's no resulting naval blockade of Germany, and Germany doesn't have to sink British ships and antagonize the U.S. into joining the war. Without the British involved, and weaker than anticipated Russian forces, Germany is able to hold its own against France, and they don't need to transport Lenin to Russia to foment the Communist revolution. In due course, the war parties agree to terms, and the circumstances are not present for Hitler to rise to power or for WWII to break out.