Favorite team:New Orleans Saints 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:251
Registered on:11/26/2016
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Sadly it wouldn't matter. Dennis Allen will continue to run Zone and put our press-man corners in position to fail.
quote:

Millennials are ruining this country.


Football down 14-7 in a game: FIRE COACH O OUR TEAM SUCKS!

Win the same game 28-7: THE TEAM WON IN SPITE OF COACH O WE’RE AWESOME


Tell me how they could be down 14-7 in a game and then win that SAME game 28-7?
quote:

Week 1: vs Houston (MNF)
Week 2: at Rams (3:25)
Week 3: at Seattle (3:25)
Week 4: vs Dallas (SNF)
Week 5: vs Tampa (noon)
Week 6: at Jacksonville (noon)
Week 7: at Chicago (3:25)
Week 8: vs Arizona (noon)
Week 9: BYE
Week 10: vs Atlanta (noon)
Week 11: at Tampa (noon)
Week 12: at Carolina (noon)
Week 13: at Atlanta (Thanksgiving Night)
Week 14: vs San Francisco (noon)
Week 15: vs Indy (MNF)
Week 16: at Tennessee (noon)
Week 17: vs Carolina (noon)


ooof 4 divisional games in a row after the bye week....

re: Kareem Hunt is a Brown

Posted by XCLSU on 2/12/19 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

This is a laughable thought, but the NFL needs to do right by the Chiefs and ban Hunt for a year.


1) The NFL doing anything correct is laughable and wont happen.

2) The Chiefs chose to release him. They were not forced to cut him and could have placed him on the designation list.

3) Hunt should not be banned for a full year because this is a first time offense. He should (and deserves) the maximum suspension for this offense as a 1st timer = 6 games.

note: I do not condone what he did to that woman and agree that the strictest punishment available shall be used.
quote:

QB Teddy Bridgewater: $22 million per year

I could see the Saints resigning Teddy for a backloaded contract with a cap hit next season of ~$5-10mil and then an avg of 16-18mil a year for the final 4 seasons.

Everyone who thinks you can get him below $16mil/year (when it counts)...not gonna happen.

Everyone who wants to let Teddy go for the 16-18mil a year. Good luck striking gold with the next QB while the Saints have a young core. Teddy can get you 50%-60% of what Drew can get you and has knowledge of the NFL game/Saints offense. He is not Drew Brees (no one is), but hes definitely better than a Blake Bortles/Joe Flacco type of QB.

There are more of a chance you get Bortles/Winston/etc. talent/type QB in the draft than getting a Mahomes.

Saints should ride the Teddy Train unless the price is wrong.

re: Saints vs Pats Live Simulation

Posted by XCLSU on 2/7/19 at 11:36 am to
30-10 late in the 3rd....
45% viewership seems like a good number from the outside. (Its almost 50% of the nation tuning in). But in the NFL's eyes, that is one of the worst looks that they could have. Goodell thought if he can pit the leagues greatest dynasty vs the leagues biggest market, people would be tuning-in in droves. And he was probably right if the NFCCG did not end the way it did. Yes, if the Saints would have lost "fairly", the NOLA market would have tuned out from the Super Bowl bc of anger, but the rest of the nation would have been super excited to see McVay vs Belichick, Glitz/Glamour vs Grind/Toughness. And since ratings/marketing matters, the Rams victory would have been touted as a fitting end to the Patriots dynasty (which started back in '01 with the same teams in a dome). The narratives for that game keep on coming, and they are more attractive to the NFL than the narratives of Brees v Brady/Payton v Belichick game. TBH, even NOLA would have probably given a mid 30s to low 40-ish rating for that super bowl if the Saints loss would have been fair.

But that didn't happen. Goodells cronies (the refs) screwed up majorly and refused to call one of the (if not THE MOST) blatant penalties (choose either PI or helmet-to-helmet) int he history of the "game". Guarantee Goodell was furious that the penalty happened in that moment and with how egregious it was. It wasn't suppose to be like that, the Rams were suppose to win close but "fairly". His plan had failed him. Now for the next 14 days, all he would hear is how the Saints were cheated (they were) and the Rams didn't deserve to be there. His planned Super Bowl was tarnished. Now he couldn't let the Rams win and really jolt that garbage LA fan base because then the story of how NOLA was cheated would NEVER go away. The game is already marked with an asterisk, and it would have only been more prominent if the Rams win.

So we ended up with what we got. The Patriots hoisting another Lombardi, and the fake Rams team putting their tails between their legs and going back to their "fan base".

Look for next season with the Saints (great narrative with redemption after being scorned by the refs/league) playing an AFC media darling team (a team similar to this years KC team or possibly even KC) in the super bowl.

This is how the NFL works under Goodell, you either build a new stadium to host a super bowl and play in one at some point, or become a media darling/push a narrative that is beneficial to the bottom-line.
quote:

True or False. During the missed call, if you sub TLL with Dez do they throw the flag or does a ref royally screw Dez twice in the playoffs?


False, because Dez would never be in that position within the Saints offense. TLL lined up in the backfield with Brees and ran a wheel route, Dez wouldn't line up in the back field. The Saints did not have anyone on the field that would "command" a flag to be thrown because of star power/history with bad calls.

For everyone that is thinking MT13 and Kamara would get the call, go back and look at the no calls against them (see Kamara's TWO no-call helmet-to-helmet hits against ATL/DAL & MT13 getting mauled most games outside of the LoS). Both players are top 5-10 players at their position and are marketable...but are not TB12 getting his shoulder smacked and seeing the yellow flags fly from all corners.

re: I was over it

Posted by XCLSU on 2/4/19 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Laaz2750
quote:

I've been avoiding L.A. sports radio for a month, but this morning it was GLORIOUS! I haven't enjoyed an hour of radio as much as I did on my drive in this morning in a very long time...

Add the Eagles

Lincoln Financial Field
1999: Pennsylvania announces funding
2000: Eagles release plans for new stadium, City of Phili agrees
2001: Break ground
2003: Stadium opens

Eagles Records
1997 - 1999: 14-33-1
2000: 11-5 Loss in Div Round
2001 - 2003: 35-13; Losses in NFCCG each year
2004 (Year after stadium opens): Loss in Super Bowl XXXIX

Seattle Seahawks

CentryLink Field
1997: Paul Allen buys Seahawks and requests new stadium
1998: Public funding was approved and ground broken
2002: Stadium opened

Seahawks Records:
1994 - 1998: 37-43
1999: 9-7 Loss in WC Round
2000-2002: 22-26 No Playoffs
2003: 10-6 Loss in WC Round
2004: 9-7 Loss in WC Round
2005: 13-3 Loss in Super Bowl XL

Detroit was the stadium build before SEA, but they did not have the same success. (Sucks to be DET)

The Patriots stadium broke ground in 2000, opened in 2002. We all know this story.

Pretty interesting to say the least.... :wha:

re: Let me get this straight...

Posted by XCLSU on 1/28/19 at 11:56 am to
This is the perfect set up for the league. They even get the Patriots (Goodell's home boys) as the opponent to allow LA to win the super bowl. Look for a decently close game, with LA pulling away in the 4th.

This super bowl was fabricated to generate fans in LA, sell PLC's and ensure the financial investment in LA was correct. Why do you think the Rams went all in with "big names"? It helped push forward the narrative that the Rams were a legitimate contender this season.

You can deny it all you want, and proclaim the NFL isn't fixed/rigged/etc. but you are lying to yourself.

Just wait and see....
quote:

What does the NFL gain from having the Rams in the SB over the Saints?

1) The Rams were the only team that scared me this season. They went all in as an organization to draw in a fan base. Fans love "names". Check the Saints threads when Suh might have come here, you'd think the guy was a god. Add Marcus Peters, Talib, Cooks...thats a team making desperate moves to make it work in LA before their multi-billion dollar stadium is built.
2) The NFL *MUST* make football work in LA to pay for that "NFL Disney World" stadium they're building in Inglewood. The NFL has/is investing billions and billions of dollars into that city. The returns will be greater if they are competitive.

You can believe that they NFL would never do anything to affect the integrity of the game. But you cannot deny that it does seem a bit fishy that this is the best outcome for the NFL.

Maybe in your world money doesn't matter, but to this CORPORATION money is the ONLY thing that matters. Rams going to the super bowl is better for the pockets of every owner. Even our sweet Gale Benson benefits from football working in LA.

quote:

And again, if the refs had directives to make sure the Rams won, they had plenty of opportunities to change the game with a phantom hold here or there.


1) It would be way more obvious and harder to explain if the refs "changed the game with a phantom hold here or there." Easier to say "I didn't see anything" then, "Well you see I thought they held blah, blah"
2) They did the exact opposite and didn't call shite. All game. Check all the pass interference calls that were not called. (Beginning of the fourth quarter to Tedd Ginn for example. And another PI missed call in the first during either the first or second drive). The Rams were holding most plays (on offense, especially on blitzes). Also on Brees INT, Fowler had his hands inside of Brees helmet.


The NFL will *NEVER* admit to a fix existing, but that doesn't mean a fix was not set up.
quote:

NFL Complaint line 212-450-2000 . Call and leave your complaint !!!

This is just as effective as calling your congressman/senator to complain about some sort of Federal or State legislation. The calls will go on deaf ears and only makes you feel better because you voiced your opinion...to people who could give a shite less.
If you cannot see that a LA vs NE super bowl is more favorable to the league than KC vs NO, then you are as blind as those two refs.

I've said it multiple times on this board, the Rams were the only team that scared me this season. They went all in and the NFL *MUST* make football work in LA to pay for that "NFL Disney World" stadium they're building in Inglewood. The NFL will *NEVER* admit to a fix existing, but that doesn't mean a fix was set up.

I believe the NFL advised the refs to ensure the game is kept close, but in no way wanted what happened last night to happen. There's a difference between not calling a PI like the one on Ted Ginn at the beginning of the 4th quarter and the blatant, obvious, targeting on TLL.

re: How superstitious are you?

Posted by XCLSU on 1/18/19 at 11:54 am to
I wear the same jersey to every home game I attend. If they win, I do not wash the jersey. If they lose, I wash the jersey. Only had to was the jersey once this season (after the TB game).

re: Saints/Rams Prediction Thread

Posted by XCLSU on 1/17/19 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

27-24 Rams
Rams vs Chiefs Super Bowl


quote:

LATECHgradLSUfan



quote:

There's a guy who knew a guy still have this game on VHS.


I still have the 09 NFCCG and Super Bowl on VHS. Can't pass up having the original broadcast.
quote:

"Let me get some of that soup!" McVay shouted from a hallway

I cannot wait for the major troll job the gameday crew is going have with the "US vs THEM" segment during the game.
quote:

quote:
Just go on YouTube.


Most people are loving the Rams. Don’t know what you’re watching
quote:

Saints are favored, and the majority of the media is picking the Saints. No clue what you're talking about.



The spread opened at 3-1/2 points. Average is about 3 points for homefield advantage normally. So Vegas is saying the Saints are favored by 1/2 point, so essentially a pick'em game. While the Saints are favored and the media may be choosing the Saints to win the game, don't think this won't be a one possession game.

re: Marcus Peters is coming back, y’all

Posted by XCLSU on 1/15/19 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

Yeah, all should be good if they don’t let Talib just maul Thomas like they let him maul Graham that time.

Big difference here is MT13 can out muscle any singe DB. Graham was too soft to beat that hard press coverage.

Only way to stop MT13 is to bracket coverage or double him with two guys at the LoS.