Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:	5
Registered on:	9/17/2015
Online Status:	Not Online

re: Official Game Thread | Buccaneers 26 Saints 19 | FINAL

Posted by Question107 on 9/20/15 at 1:18 pm to Hoodoo Man

Yea that's how you blowup a screen!

:bow:

Saints Talk

Jump to Post View Topic

re: #9 FSU (14) v. BC (0) 4th - Dalvin Cook Heisman Watch

Posted by Question107 on 9/18/15 at 7:31 pm to TheOcean

How the hell do they not review that?!?!

More Sports

Jump to Post View Topic

re: MSB: Settle a CFB Rules Debate (NSFW Pic for your Troubles)

Posted by Question107 on 9/18/15 at 9:42 am to elposter

quote:
Is your friend going to be more convinced by a bunch of random people on a sports forum or reading the actual rule? Why don't you just pull up the actual rule and show it to him?

I tried, but he was pulling up all sorts of random blog websites with who knows what explanations. We figured majority would be able to solve the debate.

More Sports

Jump to Post View Topic

MSB: Settle a CFB Rules Debate (NSFW Pic for your Troubles)

Posted by Question107 on 9/18/15 at 9:19 am

So a friend of mine and I were watching the Clemson - Louisville game last night, and at one point there appeared to be an intentional grounding. I made a comment about intentional grounding, and my buddy says "nah it's not intentional grounding". I then said "yea but he was in the pocket" to which my buddy says "doesn't matter if it goes past the line of scrimmage". I look at him like WTF?!?!

We then get in this huge argument. I know 100% fact the rule states that if the QB is outside the pocket all he has to do is throw the ball past the LOS for it not to be intentional grounding, but he won't relent.

There is money on this debate so if we could have the MSB settle this that would be great. TIA!