- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Post pics of your system
Posted on 12/21/14 at 11:20 am to daviddsims
Posted on 12/21/14 at 11:20 am to daviddsims
quote:
Thanks for the recommendations. Always wondered if I should get a sub or center channel.
Home theatre enthusiasts will probably call these the two most important pieces of any home theatre system.
Music listeners (whom I usually more typically associate the word "audiophile" with, though it applies to the latter as well) essentially agree that 2.0 is all you need. And, having listened to some nice 2.0 systems, if they're set up right, you won't miss a center too much at all. But that's if you have a high quality pair of speakers that are meticulously set up and are sitting and listening at the right spot in the room. For a room with L or u shaped seating arrangements for home theatre purposes, a center becomes more necessary/valuable. It adds little to the music listening- that's essentially universally recorded in 2.0. If you care about soundstage, you'll turn the center off and move to the middle of the room. If you don't, you can leave it on and hear mono sound just fine. I, personally, think if you prefer Mono, you've never heard good Stereo. It's just not always practical for the number of people in the room or the application (you, alone, listening to music- stereo, hands down. You have a party with people moving around the room? It doesn't really matter. Good stereo sounds fine. Good mono sounds fine, too. Because no one is critically listening to the music).
That said, you'll do yourself a real favor in any application by starting with either a center or pair of fronts, not a HTIB, and slowly building the system as your budget allows. A HTIB lacks any sort of upgradeability, and you can get much better sound + ability to add on by going with a piecemealed system (you want to stay within a specific line of one brand for your fronts and center, the sub and rears, should you ever add them, don't need to match.
Posted on 12/21/14 at 12:35 pm to CE Tiger
quote:
Post pics of your system
quote:
- 2 x Changhong (don't laugh) 42" LED TVs
what those bad boys running ya?
I believe I paid $279 each. Fairly decent specs on them too, much better than your run of the mill Black Friday special.
Posted on 12/21/14 at 12:38 pm to daviddsims
quote:
I have two Polk TSI400 floor speakers and a yamaha receiver in my system. I mainly watch tv shows and sports but not many movies. Never have been blown away the sound of the system and was thinking about adding to it. Any suggestions on what I should do next?
How is it lacking, and what are you looking to improve? Is it better with or without YPAO, and did it set everything up correctly WRT distance, levels, etc? It should be possible to get it sounding good with familiar music, and that would be the first thing I would want to try to accomplish before adding stuff. If you're still not satisfied, I would look into using REW to measure response. As I believe was mentioned earlier, the room is a huge part of the equation, and if you have bare walls and wood floors, improving that may be the best thing to do.
Posted on 12/21/14 at 12:56 pm to Spock's Eyebrow
Terrible photos and like I said the racks are in flux right now. Should have cleaner pics sometime in January.
Posted on 12/21/14 at 1:00 pm to ILikeLSUToo
quote:
Also, I clicked thinking people were going to be showing pics of their computers. Disappoint.
Me too....
This post was edited on 12/21/14 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 12/21/14 at 9:03 pm to Spock's Eyebrow
I have a Yamaha V-673 receiver but not sure if it has enough power bi-amped to really power the Polk TSI400s. It just doesn't seem to get as loud as expected.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:53 am to daviddsims
I don't see the point in bi-amping those speaker with that receiver. You're using 4 channels to bi-amp instead of just 2 channels which is all you really need. That receiver is rated at 90 watts per channel with 2 channels driven. When you add 2 additional channels you are lowering the total power output. Just hook them up with the standard 2 channels.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:34 am to daviddsims
Just how loud is expected? Are you looking for earbleed levels? Those are 91db efficient speakers so as the poster above said with 90 watts into each channel they should play plenty loud. Do you have an SPL meter? Dolby reference level is 105 decibels at peaks and that is pretty damned loud which I suspect you can hit easily.
This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 9:35 am
Posted on 12/22/14 at 4:32 pm to VABuckeye
This post was edited on 12/26/14 at 9:12 pm
Posted on 12/22/14 at 5:06 pm to Marco Esquandolas
I'll be honest, I can't even tell for sure what half of that equipment is. But it looks expensive.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 5:13 pm to Marco Esquandolas
You win, as always
Posted on 12/22/14 at 6:03 pm to Marco Esquandolas
I can't tell whether you like McIntosh or Macintosh more.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 6:21 pm to lsu480
You think he wins because you don't know what half of the equipment in my racks is. Lol
Posted on 12/22/14 at 6:58 pm to VABuckeye
quote:
You think he wins because you don't know what half of the equipment in my racks is. Lol
Right!
Posted on 12/22/14 at 7:18 pm to lsu480
Then what's in there? Sources are easy.
It's the ones you don't know and see that add up including the screen. That screen costs as much as some of the McIntosh gear by itself. Don't judge audio and video gear by the pretty gauges alone.
Which is not meant as a knock on the McIntosh system. It's beautiful and surely sounds as good as it looks.
It's the ones you don't know and see that add up including the screen. That screen costs as much as some of the McIntosh gear by itself. Don't judge audio and video gear by the pretty gauges alone.
Which is not meant as a knock on the McIntosh system. It's beautiful and surely sounds as good as it looks.
This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 7:25 pm
Posted on 12/22/14 at 7:19 pm to VABuckeye
This post has been marked unreadable!
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:31 pm to daviddsims
quote:
I have a Yamaha V-673 receiver but not sure if it has enough power bi-amped to really power the Polk TSI400s. It just doesn't seem to get as loud as expected.
Strange, I have the same receiver, two Monitor60 Series II (similar specs to the TSI400s), a CS1 Center speaker and two small rear satellites.
Not sure if it's the center speaker or not, but I've never had it higher than 80% power... and that was really really really loud.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:35 pm to philabuck
Since I don't watch a lot of movies, I never purchased a center speaker. I am just now adding a Polk PSW10 sub for Christmas.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:37 pm to VABuckeye
quote:
Lsu480, shut up you little loser. You are a moron.
Popular
Back to top


0







