Started By
Message

re: Post pics of your system

Posted on 12/21/14 at 11:20 am to
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
15388 posts
Posted on 12/21/14 at 11:20 am to
quote:

Thanks for the recommendations. Always wondered if I should get a sub or center channel.


Home theatre enthusiasts will probably call these the two most important pieces of any home theatre system.

Music listeners (whom I usually more typically associate the word "audiophile" with, though it applies to the latter as well) essentially agree that 2.0 is all you need. And, having listened to some nice 2.0 systems, if they're set up right, you won't miss a center too much at all. But that's if you have a high quality pair of speakers that are meticulously set up and are sitting and listening at the right spot in the room. For a room with L or u shaped seating arrangements for home theatre purposes, a center becomes more necessary/valuable. It adds little to the music listening- that's essentially universally recorded in 2.0. If you care about soundstage, you'll turn the center off and move to the middle of the room. If you don't, you can leave it on and hear mono sound just fine. I, personally, think if you prefer Mono, you've never heard good Stereo. It's just not always practical for the number of people in the room or the application (you, alone, listening to music- stereo, hands down. You have a party with people moving around the room? It doesn't really matter. Good stereo sounds fine. Good mono sounds fine, too. Because no one is critically listening to the music).

That said, you'll do yourself a real favor in any application by starting with either a center or pair of fronts, not a HTIB, and slowly building the system as your budget allows. A HTIB lacks any sort of upgradeability, and you can get much better sound + ability to add on by going with a piecemealed system (you want to stay within a specific line of one brand for your fronts and center, the sub and rears, should you ever add them, don't need to match.
Posted by Will Cover
Davidson, NC
Member since Mar 2007
39823 posts
Posted on 12/21/14 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Post pics of your system
quote:
- 2 x Changhong (don't laugh) 42" LED TVs




what those bad boys running ya?



I believe I paid $279 each. Fairly decent specs on them too, much better than your run of the mill Black Friday special.
Posted by Spock's Eyebrow
Member since May 2012
12300 posts
Posted on 12/21/14 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

I have two Polk TSI400 floor speakers and a yamaha receiver in my system. I mainly watch tv shows and sports but not many movies. Never have been blown away the sound of the system and was thinking about adding to it. Any suggestions on what I should do next?


How is it lacking, and what are you looking to improve? Is it better with or without YPAO, and did it set everything up correctly WRT distance, levels, etc? It should be possible to get it sounding good with familiar music, and that would be the first thing I would want to try to accomplish before adding stuff. If you're still not satisfied, I would look into using REW to measure response. As I believe was mentioned earlier, the room is a huge part of the equation, and if you have bare walls and wood floors, improving that may be the best thing to do.
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 12/21/14 at 12:56 pm to
Terrible photos and like I said the racks are in flux right now. Should have cleaner pics sometime in January.







Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
53359 posts
Posted on 12/21/14 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

Also, I clicked thinking people were going to be showing pics of their computers. Disappoint.


Me too....

This post was edited on 12/21/14 at 1:01 pm
Posted by daviddsims
West Monroe
Member since Dec 2008
587 posts
Posted on 12/21/14 at 9:03 pm to
I have a Yamaha V-673 receiver but not sure if it has enough power bi-amped to really power the Polk TSI400s. It just doesn't seem to get as loud as expected.
Posted by NewIberiaHaircut
Lafayette
Member since May 2013
12283 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:53 am to
I don't see the point in bi-amping those speaker with that receiver. You're using 4 channels to bi-amp instead of just 2 channels which is all you really need. That receiver is rated at 90 watts per channel with 2 channels driven. When you add 2 additional channels you are lowering the total power output. Just hook them up with the standard 2 channels.
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:34 am to
Just how loud is expected? Are you looking for earbleed levels? Those are 91db efficient speakers so as the poster above said with 90 watts into each channel they should play plenty loud. Do you have an SPL meter? Dolby reference level is 105 decibels at peaks and that is pretty damned loud which I suspect you can hit easily.
This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 9:35 am
Posted by Marco Esquandolas
Member since Jul 2013
11659 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 4:32 pm to
This post was edited on 12/26/14 at 9:12 pm
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 5:06 pm to
I'll be honest, I can't even tell for sure what half of that equipment is. But it looks expensive.
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92902 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 5:13 pm to
You win, as always
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
15388 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 6:03 pm to
I can't tell whether you like McIntosh or Macintosh more.
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 6:21 pm to
You think he wins because you don't know what half of the equipment in my racks is. Lol
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92902 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

You think he wins because you don't know what half of the equipment in my racks is. Lol



Right!
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 7:18 pm to
Then what's in there? Sources are easy.

It's the ones you don't know and see that add up including the screen. That screen costs as much as some of the McIntosh gear by itself. Don't judge audio and video gear by the pretty gauges alone.

Which is not meant as a knock on the McIntosh system. It's beautiful and surely sounds as good as it looks.

This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 7:25 pm
Posted by ctiger69
Member since May 2005
31030 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 7:19 pm to

This post has been marked unreadable!

Posted by Mr Gardoki
AL
Member since Apr 2010
27652 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 7:43 pm to


Just because
Posted by philabuck
NE Ohio
Member since Sep 2008
10391 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

I have a Yamaha V-673 receiver but not sure if it has enough power bi-amped to really power the Polk TSI400s. It just doesn't seem to get as loud as expected.


Strange, I have the same receiver, two Monitor60 Series II (similar specs to the TSI400s), a CS1 Center speaker and two small rear satellites.

Not sure if it's the center speaker or not, but I've never had it higher than 80% power... and that was really really really loud.
Posted by daviddsims
West Monroe
Member since Dec 2008
587 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:35 pm to
Since I don't watch a lot of movies, I never purchased a center speaker. I am just now adding a Polk PSW10 sub for Christmas.
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92902 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:37 pm to
Jesus, insecure about your system much? I thought you were kidding! Either way after looking I would still take his.


quote:

Lsu480, shut up you little loser. You are a moron.




first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram