Started By
Message

re: Google releasing RCS in the US

Posted on 11/14/19 at 4:01 pm to
Posted by dltigers3
Collierville, TN
Member since Jun 2010
2127 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 4:01 pm to
Am I completely wrong here, or is what you described RCS. Literally anyone can run an RCS hub, you just have to connect to the other hubs, and once the apis are released in the next version of Android, anyone can create a their party Android app.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28702 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 4:11 pm to
quote:



right......
Explain your reasoning/fears please.
quote:

Messaging should be completely agnostic. Just like email with SMTP, anyone should be able to run a server and send and receive from anyone else.

If you want to see where we should be going regarding messaging, then Matrix is the answer.
Great, I am all for open standards. I especially like decentralized systems. However, in essence Matrix is yet another chat app. Users not only have to be exposed to it and learn about it, but they then have to install an app and create an account. That's friction that I'm afraid will prevent it from ever achieving ubiquitous adoption.
Posted by sacrathetic
Member since May 2019
618 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 8:12 pm to
nm
This post was edited on 5/21/20 at 2:01 pm
Posted by dltigers3
Collierville, TN
Member since Jun 2010
2127 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 8:19 pm to
I somewhat agree with your point, but the problem with the end to end encryption argument is that the current solution is not encrypted anyway. So it is not like it is worse than what we currently have, it is clearly better as far as features, and the same privacy wise
Posted by Hulkklogan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2010
43296 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 8:46 pm to
It's been a major pain for Google to get carrier buy-in on RCS. I'd rather them continue to gather my data but I get a better experience than they gather my data and my experience sucks
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28702 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

No end to end encryption and with users being default funneled through the major carriers RCS servers. So, data collection en masse, and data sold to advertisers.
RCS is no different than SMS/MMS in this regard. How is this a "takeover"?
quote:

Are the major carriers really going to allow anyone to join the network? Or will we see them blacklisting servers for political wrongthink/speech?
Again, how is this different than SMS?
quote:

I agree with you in that the friction in the process is a tough fight, which is exactly why RCS is being pushed by the major corporations (and probably governments as well). They know that they can easily onboard most users and that most won't care about the lack of end-to-end encryption and that their data can be collected and sold.

And that's why I say that RCS is a bad path for us to go down.
Well, it's the same path we're already on, except with better features.

Would I prefer a different path? Of course. Like you, and unlike many, I value privacy. I don't think E2EE is in the RCS spec, however I think it's possible to add it on top as an app feature once the API is exposed.

In the meantime, though, this will be a huge upgrade for a billion SMS users, and the corporate control structure is basically unchanged.
Posted by Mr Perfect
Member since Mar 2010
17836 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 6:28 am to
dumbest people on this board @sacrathric and @colorchangingtiger
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram