Started By
Message

Can we discuss MS crushing the MBpro today?

Posted on 10/6/15 at 11:23 am
Posted by LSU_postman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2005
2883 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 11:23 am
The Surface Book looks 100% amazing and if I am in the market for a desktop replacement to play med-light gaming class ultra book that is also a tablet...hmm wait, nothing else does that .

$1500 too much for that kind of power to portability ratio for this board?
Posted by SprintFun
Columbus, OH
Member since Dec 2007
45829 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 11:32 am to
Price is steep, I'd probably rather go the surface pro route.

But I don't think you can go wrong with either.

I can only dream.
Posted by broadhead
Member since Oct 2014
2384 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 11:37 am to
Seems expensive.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 11:39 am to
For what you get, the price is very fair. (and I'm only assuming what you get since specs were only discussed in a broad sense). It's the Surface that I've been wanting all along. But if you're just gonna browse and take notes and watch videos, it's obviously overkill.
This post was edited on 10/6/15 at 11:40 am
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
24161 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 11:49 am to
quote:

For what you get, the price is very fair.


Which is what the company selling it says. What you mean to say is "thats what these specs are going for". Not that it is "fair".

The fact that an iphone experiences like a 350% markup is not fair.

Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
83418 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 11:51 am to
I think i'd still prefer my current setup, which is MBP for everyday use and SP3 for travel and as a backup laptop.

I still wouldn't want to use MS for most things.
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
40337 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 11:55 am to
quote:

and I'm only assuming what you get since specs were only discussed in a broad sense

You aren't going to want the bare bones system so I imagine the price is going to be a good bit higher for the system you want.
Posted by LSU_postman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2005
2883 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

You aren't going to want the bare bones system so I imagine the price is going to be a good bit higher for the system you want.


That was my question.. is it 1500 for the i7 with 16gb of ram the high end discrete gpu and what 1tb of ssd ?

If so then hell yes.
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
40337 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

16gb of ram the high end discrete gpu and what 1tb of ssd
Nope.

That system is for the OT Ballers only.
Posted by DoubleDown
New Orleans, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2008
13141 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

$1500 too much for that kind of power to portability ratio for this board?

I could maybe swing the $1500 but that's for the i5 with 8gb ram. Did you see what the price was for the i7 and 16gig of ram was? ... Yea, $2500.
Fooooook that.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 12:05 pm to
I don't know if that will necessarily be the case here. What I'm expecting/hoping is that every model with have the i7 (only the i7 was mentioned), and the differences will be RAM and SSD capacity. And since this is being advertised as a Surface Pro on steroids, so it's difficult to envision 4GB of RAM being the starting capacity. I'm thinking base model is i7/8GB/128 or 256GB SSD, with 16GB/512+ offerings. Even if it's i5, no big deal.
Posted by leRev
Member since Mar 2013
383 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 12:13 pm to
i5/128GB/8GB RAM: $1499
i5/256GB/8GB RAM: $1699
i5/256GB/8GB RAM/dGPU: $1899
i7/256GB/8GB RAM/dGPU: $2099
i7/512GB/16GB RAM/dGPU: $2699
This post was edited on 10/6/15 at 12:38 pm
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 12:22 pm to
Ah, I see it on the store. The most disappointing thing is you have to spend $1899 to get the dedicated GPU, so I stand corrected. The $1899 model would be the minimum I'd want. When they were talking about it on stage, mentioning the dGPU, i7, PCIe SSD, I was thinking it's gonna cost $2,000. Out of my budget.
Posted by LSU_postman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2005
2883 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

i5/128GB/8GB RAM: $1499
i5/256GB/8GB RAM: $1699
i5/256GB/8GB RAM/dGPU: $1899
i7/256GB/8GB RAM/dGPU: $2099
i7/512GB/16GB RAMN/dGPU: $2699


yea that is steep. i5/8gb/128 is just not a high enough starting point. You could get a killer surface pro 4 for that right ?

eta : yes, that is the top of the surface price range (1499 for 16gb ram / i5 and 256 ssd)

Best deal might be surface pro 3 - 8gb / 256 / i7 for 1399
This post was edited on 10/6/15 at 12:27 pm
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 12:30 pm to
Yeah the way I see it, depending on your use, the sensible choices are bare minimum Surface Pro, An i5/8GB Surface Pro, the i5/dGPU Surface Book, or the all-out i7/16GB/dGPU Surface Book. The jump from the i5 to i7 in the Surface Book is not worth $200 alone (not that the i7/512/16 is worth the 600 leap from there, but if you want something more than the $1899 model, make it count). People think those mobile U-series i7s are so much better than the i5 counterpart, but they really aren't.
Posted by bigblake
Member since Jun 2011
2536 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 12:40 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/5/15 at 9:39 pm
Posted by LSU_postman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2005
2883 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 12:45 pm to
How do you think the surface book pro compares to the VAIO Z Canvas that you made a thread about ?

Their i7 offering is 3k it looked like. Is the 45w i7 chip more powerful than the i7 going in the surface book ? Fair apples to apples compare?
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 12:48 pm to
What's wrong with MS Office on OS X?

I wouldn't compare the Surface Pro to a Macbook Pro, though. And it's not really valid to compare just specs either, since the clear bonus here is the extended tablet functionality. If you have no use for the tablet aspect, there is no reason to get any Surface product.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

How do you think the surface book pro compares to the VAIO Z Canvas that you made a thread about ?

Their i7 offering is 3k it looked like. Is the 45w i7 chip more powerful than the i7 going in the surface book ? Fair apples to apples compare?


It's a fair enough comparison. The i7 in that VAIO is significantly faster than the i7s you'll find in the surface, Macbook pro, etc. But that CPU has no business being in a tablet. I'd buy any of the Surface models (Pro and Book) before considering the VAIO.

And again, the i7 in the Surface compared to its i5 counterpart is not, by any stretch of the imagination, worth the extra money. They are literally the same chip, with a difference of 1MB of L3 cache and a couple hundred MHz base clock. Both are dual-core, both have hyperthreading. The performance difference amounts to maybe 10% at best. Spending extra specifically for the i7 is really foolish.
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
24161 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

What's wrong with MS Office on OS X?



its yucky
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram