Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Best camera for expecting mom

Posted on 10/8/17 at 10:30 pm
Posted by bengaltygers
Da East
Member since Dec 2007
1699 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 10:30 pm
We are expecting our first baby in December. Wife wants a camera for her birthday. I am completely ignorant as to what a good camera is. Help.
Posted by lynxcat
Member since Jan 2008
24132 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 12:52 am to
Unless she plans on getting into photography, she will be able to take better pictures with a high end smartphone than with a point and shoot camera. So, I would say she doesn’t need a camera if she has a Galaxy, iPhone, or the like.
Posted by 10MTNTiger
Banks of the Guadalupe
Member since Sep 2012
4139 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 6:36 am to
Iphone with Amazon Unlimited Photo storage /Thread
Posted by tigers win2
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2009
3837 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 7:05 am to
quote:

by lynxcat
Unless she plans on getting into photography, she will be able to take better pictures with a high end smartphone than with a point and shoot camera. So, I would say she doesn’t need a camera if she has a Galaxy, iPhone, or the like.



I agree with this completely.

However, when the other moms have a cannon rebel (or similar looking) long lense camera at their kids birthday party or sporting events, there becomes a "NEED" for a similar style camera. I have one as a result of this situations. The wife can barely figure out how to charge the battery and has no idea about any of the settings.
Posted by VABuckeye
Naples, FL
Member since Dec 2007
35482 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 7:35 am to
Yeah, a DSLR would be a horrible choice. They want something to capture moments with.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84062 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 8:04 am to
quote:

she will be able to take better pictures with a high end smartphone than with a point and shoot camera


bullshite. A Nikon d3300 is stupid easy to use on its auto setting and the pictures are better than anything my S8 could produce.
Posted by VABuckeye
Naples, FL
Member since Dec 2007
35482 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 8:33 am to
I agree that the images won't be better from a phone than something like a D3300. However, a solid point and shoot would probably be easier to manage and haul around.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61441 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 8:34 am to
quote:

A Nikon d3300 is stupid easy to use on its auto setting and the pictures are better than anything my S8 could produce.


1) The S8 is a single lens camera, no? The Dual Lens cameras like the iPhone 7/8 Plus and the Galaxy Note 8 are supposed to give you DSLR-like Depth of Field. I've never used one so I can't confirm that personally, but it does appear to be the primary benefit of the dual lens setup.

2) I have a d5100 and I agree that in auto mode it takes way better pictures than I've taken with any other camera. However it is bulky and not always on me. Maybe it's the thing you take pictures of planned moments with like blowing out the candles at the birthday party, but you'd probably rather be taking video on your phone of that anyway.
This post was edited on 10/9/17 at 8:35 am
Posted by MintBerry Crunch
Member since Nov 2010
4830 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 9:00 am to
a6000. a6500 if you've got the cash


they're mirrorless, so they can easily be held in one camera.

You can get one with kit lenses for $1000 for the a6000 and $1600 for the a6500.

I've got an a6500. It's amazing.
This post was edited on 10/9/17 at 9:02 am
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79120 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

1) The S8 is a single lens camera, no? The Dual Lens cameras like the iPhone 7/8 Plus and the Galaxy Note 8 are supposed to give you DSLR-like Depth of Field. I've never used one so I can't confirm that personally, but it does appear to be the primary benefit of the dual lens setup.



It does, but I think you'd struggle to do that with kids. I mean, I'm sure it can be and is done, but I'd have trouble keeping up if using a phone camera. Cameras are great on modern smart phones, but when kids are growing up fast and you don't want to miss something screwing around with the phone, I totally get it.

I think a DSLR is doable, because they're very close to foolproof on full auto. Of course, as you say, you have to be committed to taking it.

I had a D5100 I never used much, as well as a couple other Nikon bodies over the years. Now I've settled into a Fuji x100t and a smartphone combo. That's about as photographer as I want to be, and I can certainly sing the praises of Fuji for shots of kids. For portrait photography those cameras are immaculate and are absolutely within the reach of everyone. And it's easy to have on me.

But that's a lot of camera if you're not into photography. Most DSLRs are too, but you can get really good cameras for cheap (but again, they're a pain for the uncommitted to lug around). Another option would be a high end point and shoot (RX 100 line, Ricoh GR, etc.).
Posted by NewIberiaHaircut
Lafayette
Member since May 2013
11541 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 5:30 pm to
Get one of the Sony mirrorless options. That said, my Canon 80D allows me to connect to my phone and easily text/share photos. It's a cool feature that my family appreciates. I'm not sure if the Sony does the same thing.
Posted by Lou Pai
Member since Dec 2014
28103 posts
Posted on 10/9/17 at 5:36 pm to
Get a gopro for the little one.
Posted by tenderfoot tigah
Red Stick
Member since Sep 2004
10384 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 10:20 am to
Facebook compresses images to smartphone quality.

That's all the infomation you need to make an educated decision.
Posted by TU Rob
Birmingham
Member since Nov 2008
12732 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 11:42 am to
Go to Sam's and buy either a Nikon or Canon. Get one in a kit with multiple lenses. That's what we've got. We still break it out occasionally, and most every year we get some friends or family to take family pics for Christmas cards. If you're going to events like school shows, having a legit zoom will be much better than smartphone pictures. Sure, you can use it on Auto 95% of the time, but even a little internet research and some trial and error, you can get some awesome shots out of what is out there today.
Posted by yellowfin
Coastal Bar
Member since May 2006
97615 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 1:52 pm to
iPhone
Posted by CubsFanBudMan
Member since Jul 2008
5060 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 2:41 pm to
I got my wife a Nikkon DSLR for her birthday for our 2nd baby. My wife took pics of the 1st baby every month for the first year. She was trying to do so with a Sony point & shoot at the time, and would always complain that it took too long between pictures. With the DSLR she'll be able to take a bunch of pics in a burst to get the perfect one.

Nikkon is the official camera of Disney World. If it's good enough for Disney, it's good enough for me (slight sarcasm).
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram