- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Weekend match thread: tGOAT returns
Posted on 1/14/23 at 8:46 am to SEC. 593
Posted on 1/14/23 at 8:46 am to SEC. 593
quote:
Which defender was obstructed?
Ederson and the two defenders. He ran several yards with the ball UNDER HIS FEET. Although he didn’t touch the ball, he was most definitely playing the ball in and at the last second he is allowed to let someone Nick it into the goal?
If that were a legal play, don’t you think we’d see shite like this from “the training ground” on a regular basis?
He was ON the ball.
He was PLAYING the ball.
He AFFECTED the defenders and the goal.
2
Posted on 1/14/23 at 8:46 am to tigerfan24736
quote:
Lol cry City fans, UNITED ARE COOKING.
I’m not a City fan btw. I’m much further down the table
Posted on 1/14/23 at 8:47 am to theGarnetWay
Yea I know that wasn’t for you just for any City fan that is in the thread
Posted on 1/14/23 at 8:48 am to tigerfan24736
Wolves finna eat
Cunha going in dry on tHam
Cunha going in dry on tHam
Posted on 1/14/23 at 8:48 am to theGarnetWay
When he didn't even make an attempt on the ball?
Posted on 1/14/23 at 8:50 am to LuckySo-n-So
He never played the ball or attempted to shoot it
If anything the gray area is his run changing the decision making of the City defenders
But once Bruno called for it Rashford got away from the ball completely then Bruno shot it
If anything the gray area is his run changing the decision making of the City defenders
But once Bruno called for it Rashford got away from the ball completely then Bruno shot it
Posted on 1/14/23 at 8:50 am to SEC. 593
quote:
When he didn't even make an attempt on the ball?
Hard to do when Rashford effectively ran a screen against him.
This post was edited on 1/14/23 at 8:52 am
Posted on 1/14/23 at 8:51 am to AU_RX
Fred’s man marking of KDB today was fricking fantastic
AWB was outstanding today as well
AWB was outstanding today as well
Posted on 1/14/23 at 8:51 am to StraightCashHomey21
If rashford isn't there then ederson probably comes off his line earlier and clears it. At least you can certainly make that case.
I think it was pretty easily offside, personally.
But I'm glad it stood just for the chaos.
eta: Had Rashford, knowing he was offside, pulled up his run early that would be one thing. But he legit took 5 or so paces with the ball under his feet.
I think it was pretty easily offside, personally.
But I'm glad it stood just for the chaos.
eta: Had Rashford, knowing he was offside, pulled up his run early that would be one thing. But he legit took 5 or so paces with the ball under his feet.
This post was edited on 1/14/23 at 8:54 am
Posted on 1/14/23 at 8:53 am to LuckySo-n-So
None of the two defenders even made a play on the ball. If they had, than yeah I'd agree with you. However, they both just ran with the play waiting on the call.
Ederson may have been deceived, but he wasn't obstructed physiaclly or with line-of-site.
Ederson may have been deceived, but he wasn't obstructed physiaclly or with line-of-site.
This post was edited on 1/14/23 at 8:54 am
Posted on 1/14/23 at 8:53 am to bbap
Love the decision of no offsides but I will say that goal will likely result in a rule change. In honesty if rashford wasn’t there I still don’t think much would’ve been different.
Posted on 1/14/23 at 8:53 am to bbap
SCH knows that was a shite call but he's being a good soldier. Salute
Posted on 1/14/23 at 8:57 am to theGarnetWay
quote:
Hard to do when Rashford effectively ran a screen against him.
Watch the replay again. Akanji wasn't even running the direction of the ball movement.
Posted on 1/14/23 at 8:57 am to RandySavage
Pep 
Posted on 1/14/23 at 8:57 am to RandySavage
frick Liverpool. Brighton going in dry today.
Posted on 1/14/23 at 9:02 am to CobraCommander83
Which second games y’all watching? I’ve got Wolves West Ham on. I like a good train wreck.
Posted on 1/14/23 at 9:02 am to CobraCommander83
I love watching people arguing about interpretations of the LOTG who have likely never taken a referee class and have never blown a whistle in charge of a U8 rec game, let alone a professional league match.
Posted on 1/14/23 at 9:04 am to SEC. 593
quote:
None of the two defenders even made a play on the ball. If they had, then yeah I'd agree with you.
They couldn’t “make a play” on the ball because it was under Rashford’s feet, between his legs. No whistle. No flag. The custom since VAR is to play it through and sort it out after. Why risk a penalty by sticking your foot in and possibly tripping him in the box? You don’t commit a penalty because you think the guy is offsides.
Ederson had to play Rashford because he “had” the ball.
It’s all fricking horse shite.
Posted on 1/14/23 at 9:06 am to Floyd Dawg
You don't have to take a referee class to watch that and know that it without question affected the play of the defenders the keeper.
Only a nerd who has only taken a referee class and never actually played the sport could interpret it otherwise.
Only a nerd who has only taken a referee class and never actually played the sport could interpret it otherwise.
Posted on 1/14/23 at 9:07 am to Floyd Dawg
quote:
Floyd Dawg
Curious, what is your interpretation of the call?
Page 9 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News