- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/28/13 at 4:50 pm to vuvuzela
quote:
Technically he's right.
No, in no way is he right.
Posted on 7/28/13 at 4:50 pm to vuvuzela
quote:
Technically he's right.
thanks
wait... thanking an Alabama fan
Posted on 7/28/13 at 4:50 pm to vuvuzela
Donovan touched the ball. Shea was behind him.
Posted on 7/28/13 at 4:50 pm to VanRIch
Landon has scored or assisted on the us' s last 9 of 10 goals
Not too shabby for an overrated player
Not too shabby for an overrated player
Posted on 7/28/13 at 4:51 pm to RandySavage
quote:
No, in no way is he right.
If Landon touched it, it shuold've been called offsides. Shea was behind the last defender based on my interpretation of the last replay. If Landon didn't touch it, Shea certainly wasn't offsides.
Posted on 7/28/13 at 4:51 pm to RandySavage
This ref makes some of the worst advantage calls. If there's no clear immediate advantage to playing-on, you make the foul call.
Posted on 7/28/13 at 4:52 pm to vuvuzela
You're not offsides if you're behind the ball.
Posted on 7/28/13 at 4:52 pm to The Boat
quote:
You're not offsides if you're behind the ball.
He was ahead of the ball as well from what I saw.
Posted on 7/28/13 at 4:53 pm to vuvuzela
quote:
If Landon touched it, it shuold've been called offsides. Shea was behind the last defender based on my interpretation of the last replay. If Landon didn't touch it, Shea certainly wasn't offsides.
last replay definitely showed the ball was too far in front of Landon's slide... and he missed it
Shea was onside on the original cross... but he was clearly behind the last defender had Landon touched it
This post was edited on 7/28/13 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 7/28/13 at 4:53 pm to vuvuzela
quote:shea was still behind the player that would've touched the ball. He was onside in either situation
If Landon touched it, it shuold've been called offsides. Shea was behind the last defender based on my interpretation of the last replay. If Landon didn't touch it, Shea certainly wasn't offsides.
Posted on 7/28/13 at 4:53 pm to vuvuzela
Who gives a frick? GOAL USA MOTHERfrickERS
Posted on 7/28/13 at 4:53 pm to PTBob
quote:
he wasn't.
Haven't watched the replay, I'll take your word on it.
Posted on 7/28/13 at 4:54 pm to rt3
quote:
Shea was onside on the original cross... but he was clearly off had Landon touched it

Posted on 7/28/13 at 4:54 pm to rt3
Landon didn't look like he touched it.
This post was edited on 7/28/13 at 4:55 pm
Posted on 7/28/13 at 4:54 pm to The Boat
This board makes the tiger rant look reasonable. 
Popular
Back to top



1




