Started By
Message

.

Posted on 9/2/14 at 11:52 am
Posted by GeauxTigers2020
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 11:52 am
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/17/25 at 5:38 pm
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 11:54 am to
quote:

Fraser Forster (Celtic, loan),



Wrong



Is this your list?
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 11:55 am
Posted by GeauxTigers2020
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 11:56 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/17/25 at 5:39 pm
Posted by joey barton
Member since Feb 2011
11468 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 11:56 am to
ETA: Title change
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 1:39 pm
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 11:58 am to
quote:

Info is copied from ESPN.




ESPN's info is very wrong then. Lots of mistakes. The Forster one is just the first I saw.


quote:

Winners and Losers IMO



I'd put Hull as a loser due to them failing to strengthen before getting knocked out of the Europa.
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 12:01 pm to
Meh. It's not like staying in Europa would have been very beneficial for them.

ETA: If they could make a deep run, sure, but don't know how possible that would've been.
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 12:03 pm
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9756 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

Meh. It's not like staying in Europa would have been very beneficial for them.


It's sad that Europa League is this way but it is.

It would be better for the game if a Hull (or Torino etc etc etc) weren't so pressured by maintaining salvation in a cut throat league that qualifying for Europe often becomes a potential nightmare more than a chance for their fans to celebrate big atmosphere matches and clubs with little else to ever really win can go all out for some glory.



Posted by Wait For It...
Member since Jun 2012
3542 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 1:38 pm to
Everton and Man U's first wins of the season
Posted by GeauxTigers2020
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:01 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/17/25 at 5:39 pm
Posted by NOTORlOUSD
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2010
5051 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:19 pm to
It's disingenuous to call Arsenal a "loser" on the transfer market when every player sold was replaced by a younger player of the same caliber. Even factoring in the loss of Giroud, it's at least a push.
Posted by GeauxTigers2020
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:27 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/17/25 at 5:39 pm
Posted by Friend of OBUDan
Member since Dec 2008
9963 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

It seemed blatantly obvious they needed a top class striker before Giroud was injured.


nah

quote:

Cavani


not available

quote:

Falcao


~30m for one year of any player isn't something we can/want to swing.

quote:

Balotelli


would rather have welbeck

quote:

No defensive midfielder


we'll need someone soon, but arteta is still great. flamini...ehhh, but decent backup.

quote:

Only two true central defenders (Chambers can fill in but will have a tough time being asked to cover 2-3 positions as a teenager)


CB is really the only thing that i'm upset about, but it's not enough to completely ruin the summer. putting them on the losers list is like honigstein saying sanogo (on a free!) was the worst signing of last summer.
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
88353 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

Balotelli


would rather have welbeck


Posted by TFTC
Chicago, Il
Member since May 2010
23689 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:47 pm to
I don't see how you can say Arsenal are losers for not meeting needs, when Man U obviously didn't address even bigger holes (and they were "winners")... unless you are just star gazing...

I think by and large, all of the top teams improved their squads, though I do think CFC and Man City come out on top, mainly due to their squads being very strong to begin with..

Just my opinion...

This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 3:43 pm
Posted by Friend of OBUDan
Member since Dec 2008
9963 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:04 pm to
same age, better work rate, more versatility, less likelihood of blowing up in your face. they have similar profligacy in taking chances. both have it in them to improve greatly. not saying balo isn't more talented, he is, but he's been living off that potential for awhile. rodgers has won big off of gambles so far so it makes sense he would try to gamble here, but welbeck is the safer pick.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
40042 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:07 pm to
Also Balo loves the ball to feet. We have enough of those players. We need a player who will run, which is why I Welbeck is a good signing for us. We have plenty of passers who can create chances, but one half of making a chance is having a willing runner at the end of it stretching the defense. Balo does it when he wants, but we have needed someone to do it consistently ever since Walcott got injured.
Posted by Friend of OBUDan
Member since Dec 2008
9963 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:29 pm to
that too.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126858 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

Also Balo loves the ball to feet. We have enough of those players. We need a player who will run, which is why I Welbeck is a good signing for us. We have plenty of passers who can create chances, but one half of making a chance is having a willing runner at the end of it stretching the defense. Balo does it when he wants, but we have needed someone to do it consistently ever since Walcott got injured.



Danny is a much better team player. Not as talented as swag but will work much much hard with out the ball.

So I can see why Arsenal fans would rather have him. People who love to bash him b/c he doesn't score as much don't notice the other things he does out there.
Posted by TFTC
Chicago, Il
Member since May 2010
23689 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:41 pm to
He may be a better fit for Arsenal, but for the same price, I'd take Balo all day (not a fan of DW, though he seems like a likeable guy)... There would have been a price that I'm sure wouldn't have been worth the gamble and he may still end up not paying off... but I like it..

He may turn out to be your Sturridge... who knows..


Posted by BobbyGoulet
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2007
3784 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

EPL Transfer Window Losers


Alan Irwin

Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram