- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: THE ENGLAND THREAD
Posted on 6/10/12 at 4:23 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Posted on 6/10/12 at 4:23 pm to StraightCashHomey21
espn devoting the last 20mins to the three lions 
0
Posted on 6/10/12 at 4:24 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Scott Parker and Gerrard is a much more tactically logical midfield partnership. Fat Frank sucked for England, even more so when he played alongside Gerrard.
Ashley Young is the real key player in these first two games. He's the only creative player up top without Rooney.
Ashley Young is the real key player in these first two games. He's the only creative player up top without Rooney.
Posted on 6/10/12 at 4:27 pm to thenry712
quote:
Fat Frank
watch it
quote:
even more so when he played alongside Gerrard.
b/c essentially they were the same player out there. They never worked well together but thrived when the other was not in.
quote:
Ashley Young is the real key player in these first two games. He's the only creative player up top without Rooney
if they can survive long enough to have rooney back watch out
Posted on 6/10/12 at 4:32 pm to StraightCashHomey21
preemptive rally lee bowyer
Posted on 6/10/12 at 4:33 pm to thenry712
quote:
Ashley Young is the real key player in these first two games. He's the only creative player up top without Rooney.
If England would have featured Scholes centrally, then I think they would have been more dangerous in recent years.
I just kind of feel like that is part of the reason he retired from international play (and being old). Scholesy should be pulling the strings.
Posted on 6/10/12 at 5:20 pm to StraightCashHomey21
They need to rename the Three Lions to the Manchelseapool team. Rooney, Wellbeck, Young, Jones, Terry, Cole, Cahill (pre injury), Super Frank (pre injury). Carroll-lousy, Downing-Lousy, Henderson-Lousy, Defoe-Lousy. The England national team could not be more flat for a "big" country. I don't expect anything but disappointment from this team.
Posted on 6/10/12 at 5:31 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
looks like your time in france was counter productive
What, was that overconfidence from the England camp? Nawwwww....
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:56 pm to engvol
quote:
England will live up to the hype because we dont have any, get out of the group stages and everything will be ok.
so true. Maybe reverse hype will do the squad some good.
quote:
I'd personnally pick Carroll over Wellbeck, dont really rate his ability as a lone striker and Mexes/Rami will be able o cope with him much better than Carrolls physical presence.
couldn't agree more. I think a lone striker has to be physical.
Posted on 6/10/12 at 7:59 pm to thenry712
quote:
Who the hell expects anything out of a team that may feature Stewart Downing
is there any talk he will actually start or be a sub?
Posted on 6/10/12 at 8:01 pm to thenry712
quote:
Scott Parker and Gerrard is a much more tactically logical midfield partnership. Fat Frank sucked for England, even more so when he played alongside Gerrard.
agreed. I actually like Gerrard alot. It's a shame he hasn't been healthy.
quote:
Ashley Young is the real key player in these first two games. He's the only creative player up top without Rooney.
agreed.
Posted on 6/10/12 at 8:04 pm to adammwilson
some great comments in this thread. 
Posted on 6/10/12 at 8:09 pm to adammwilson
Brazil has a better chance of winning this tournament than England.
Posted on 6/10/12 at 9:04 pm to hendersonshands
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:25 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Big talk from someone whose team has not won a thing in 16 years now.
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:27 pm to RandySavage
quote:
Big talk from someone whose team has not won a thing in 16 years now.
What has England won during that span?
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:31 pm to WarSlamEagle
quote:
What has England won during that span?
England never lives up to the hype, everyone knows that. I'm just saying if my team had come home empty handed from 7 straight tournaments I don't think I'd be running my mouth too much.
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:31 pm to RandySavage
quote:
England never lives up to the hype, everyone knows that. I'm just saying if my team had come home empty handed from 7 straight tournaments I don't think I'd be running my mouth too much.
MY TEAM IS NETHERLANDS AND WE ALWAYS COME UP SHORT. EVEN AGAINST DENMARK.
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:33 pm to WarSlamEagle
True but for such a small nation it's actually pretty remarkable the quality the Netherlands put out year in and year out. Respect.
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:34 pm to RandySavage
quote:
Big talk from someone whose team has not won a thing in 16 years now.
Sixteen years? More like 46 years of failure AMIRITE?
Page 2 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News