- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Say hello to the USA WC away kit
Posted on 3/7/14 at 9:41 pm to fightingtigers98
Posted on 3/7/14 at 9:41 pm to fightingtigers98
quote:
stop being a fricking count bro
1
Posted on 3/7/14 at 9:43 pm to Harry Pitts
quote:nice picture man
Harry Pitts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 9:45 pm to fightingtigers98
It gets the point across
Posted on 3/7/14 at 9:48 pm to Harry Pitts
quote:yea, i just thought Broski was acting like a dick. He is usually a good poster, makes solid contributions.
It gets the point across
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:38 pm to droman225
lots of haters up in here. that looks cool as frick, well, compared to the golf shirts.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 12:02 am to cigsmcgee
Let's get real. Nike dropped the ball. I'm turning on the Home one and I'll probably buy it.
This away kit is an abortion. It looks like a fricking 5-year old girls soccer jersey sponsored by Academy.
This away kit is an abortion. It looks like a fricking 5-year old girls soccer jersey sponsored by Academy.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 12:42 am to pvilleguru
quote:
I said the same thing in the other thread about this jersey.
Again...that's the way ALL Nike jerseys look for Brazil. That's the way Nike kits have always looked for the most part. If you want an over-thought, over complicated mess look to Puma or Adidas. Nike kits have always been about clean lines and simplicity. I love how people are acting outraged at something that's literally always been the case.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 12:45 am to thesoccerfanjax
quote:it is not about the simplicity people hate, it is the way they look. They lack effort
Again...that's the way ALL Nike jerseys look for Brazil. That's the way Nike kits have always looked for the most part. If you want an over-thought, over complicated mess look to Puma or Adidas. Nike kits have always been about clean lines and simplicity. I love how people are acting outraged at something that's literally always been the case.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 12:50 am to fightingtigers98
So they should keep it simple, but try harder? Got it.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 1:01 am to thesoccerfanjax
quote:i never said that. I said they don't hate simplistic designs, but the kits look like something a U12 team would buy from a soccer store.
So they should keep it simple, but try harder? Got it.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 7:04 am to thesoccerfanjax
Hell, the sash jerseys were pretty simple. For example: just a solid red shirt with a thick blue sash and a smaller blue line on either side. Yet that still looked really good. These don't. It's fine if you want to include all of our colors onto the shirt, but now we look like former Yugoslavia or those popsicles.
The Waldos were simple. Just alternating red and white hoops. However, it still resembled our flag and looked really good.
The Waldos were simple. Just alternating red and white hoops. However, it still resembled our flag and looked really good.
This post was edited on 3/8/14 at 7:08 am
Posted on 3/8/14 at 1:59 pm to pvilleguru
Im undecided on the away one. But I just bumped into the home jersey at Academy and took one home with me 
Posted on 3/8/14 at 5:00 pm to BCLA
quote:
But I just bumped into the home jersey at Academy and took one home with me
Was it in the Tennis section?
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:09 pm to beezylsu
Saw the home jersey today in person and its nothing more than a 25$ polo from old navy. What a pos.
This post was edited on 3/8/14 at 9:10 pm
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:10 pm to WhoDatNC
So in 2009 were they nothing more than a $10 t-shirt from Old Navy?
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:11 pm to WhoDatNC
And when did our colors become the blue, white and red instead of red, white and blue?!
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:18 pm to WhoDatNC
I don't know if you noticed this, but the waldos didn't actually feature any blue....
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:22 pm to thesoccerfanjax
I see blue.
This post was edited on 3/8/14 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:25 pm to pvilleguru
The shorts don't count as they wore white shorts as well.
But, the collar is blue. My bad. But it doesn't help that guy's argument because those are also "blue, red and white". As if the order ever mattered in situations like these.
But, the collar is blue. My bad. But it doesn't help that guy's argument because those are also "blue, red and white". As if the order ever mattered in situations like these.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 9:27 pm to thesoccerfanjax
I believe the names and numbers were blue as well.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News