- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Match Day 3-1: The I’m still drunk almost got in a fight with the donut man edition
Posted on 3/1/20 at 10:27 am to GeauxHouston
Posted on 3/1/20 at 10:27 am to GeauxHouston
It sounds like De Gea told Ole he was clearly distracted by Gryf and would have made the save except for him being there. Now that is funny, maybe he had a ten foot pole he was going to pull out his arse!! When you have no skin in the game it’s fun as hell when this happens.
0
Posted on 3/1/20 at 10:27 am to BlackCoffeeKid
quote:
Roy Keane would like to have a word.
He's on there to just stir shite up
Posted on 3/1/20 at 10:28 am to Dead End
quote:
VAR gives that to a "top 6" club.
Link
True. Chelsea got a goal where the line of sight was clearly obstructed by an offside player. De Gea’d line of sight was not obstructed and Gylfi didn’t interfere with the play so it should stand. To quote SCH, anyone with half a brain should know this
Posted on 3/1/20 at 10:28 am to Dead End
quote:
He basically said he wouldn't have been upset if it stood because DDG wouldn't have made the save.
Your man was part of the run of play in an offside position sitting in front of the keeper.
Posted on 3/1/20 at 10:29 am to cwil177
They just said Ancelotti has gotten into the refs locker room. This is fantastic.
Posted on 3/1/20 at 10:29 am to cwil177
quote:
Gylfi didn’t interfere with the play so it should stand. To quote SCH, anyone with half a brain should know this
are you blind
he was literally in the path of the ball
Posted on 3/1/20 at 10:30 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
dont you have MLS to suck off instead
Haha, way to deflect when you know you’ve got no ground to stand on in this thread
dude come on you’ve got to come up with some better talking points. 
Posted on 3/1/20 at 10:30 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
At the end of the day that call is heart breaking but we have a bunch of people who are forgetting the rules or don't understand them bc they are mad or hate United.
You think the NBCSN crew fall into one of those categories?
Posted on 3/1/20 at 10:31 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
he was literally in the path of the ball
Was De Gea’s vision obstructed? You think it was? Sorry bby I didn’t realize De Gea was one foot tall.
Posted on 3/1/20 at 10:31 am to cwil177
quote:
Haha, way to deflect when you know you’ve got no ground to stand on in this thread
dude come on you’ve got to come up with some better talking points.
It was a response to your little dig when you have no talking points
you really suck at this
You started to throw shite first, not the other way around
Posted on 3/1/20 at 10:33 am to Dead End
quote:
You think the NBCSN crew fall into one of those categories?
Pundits have opinions and sometimes they are wrong
so we can agree to disagree but fact is he was in direct path of the ball in an offside position while sitting in front of the keeper. By the letter of the law the goal does not stand.
Three years ago its a 100% goal
Posted on 3/1/20 at 10:35 am to StraightCashHomey21
UTV!!!!!!
Posted on 3/1/20 at 10:36 am to cwil177
quote:
Was De Gea’s vision obstructed? You think it was? Sorry bby I didn’t realize De Gea was one foot tall.
You do realize he was part of the run of play in an offside position and had to lift his legs up for the ball to head in right?
This post was edited on 3/1/20 at 10:42 am
Posted on 3/1/20 at 10:38 am to StraightCashHomey21
I'm ok with the offside call, my only question is did the defender make a deliberate attempt to play the ball? If so, then it should be a good goal.
I'd also add, at the moment of the shot, the attacker was laying on the ground in an offside position directly between the ball and the GK.
I'd also add, at the moment of the shot, the attacker was laying on the ground in an offside position directly between the ball and the GK.
This post was edited on 3/1/20 at 10:42 am
Posted on 3/1/20 at 10:43 am to pvilleguru
quote:
I'd also add, at the moment of the shot, the attacker was laying on the ground in an offside position directly between the ball and the GK.
That and he was in the direct path of the ball while its on its way in the net.
He is part of the play while in an offside position.
Posted on 3/1/20 at 10:52 am to StraightCashHomey21
Kun 1-0 in the City invitational
Posted on 3/1/20 at 10:57 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
It was a response to your little dig when you have no talking points
you really suck at this
Lol you’re getting owned in this thread
Posted on 3/1/20 at 11:00 am to cwil177
quote:
Lol you’re getting owned in this thread
For being correct??
No one can argue the fact he is part of the play while in an offside position. Once he moves his legs out of the path of the ball he is part of the run of play.
Posted on 3/1/20 at 11:02 am to StraightCashHomey21
Aston Villa just got screwed. Should’ve been a goal kick.
Posted on 3/1/20 at 11:02 am to StraightCashHomey21
2-0 this is over
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News