- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Less than 150 MLS games coached need not apply
Posted on 10/17/18 at 10:16 am
Posted on 10/17/18 at 10:16 am
How to screen out good USMNT coaches
Less than 150 MLS games coached need not apply.
-Tata need not apply
Must speak English.
Everybody say hello to a coach that primarily is from the MLS.
Less than 150 MLS games coached need not apply.
-Tata need not apply
Must speak English.
Everybody say hello to a coach that primarily is from the MLS.
7
Posted on 10/17/18 at 10:23 am to NewbombII
Heard this this morning on Sirus FC 'The football Show'. In the meantime El Tri will probably be getting Tata.
Posted on 10/17/18 at 10:24 am to NewbombII
waiting for the USSF boot lickers to tell everyone to trust the process 
Posted on 10/17/18 at 10:32 am to NewbombII
quote:
Less than 150 MLS games coached need not apply.
Where's this coming from?
Posted on 10/17/18 at 10:51 am to pvilleguru
They will only consider coaches with 150 mls games coached.
Posted on 10/17/18 at 10:53 am to NewbombII
quote:
They will only consider coaches with 150 mls games coached
Again, where is this coming from?
Posted on 10/17/18 at 11:04 am to pvilleguru
They also mentioned it during half time of the game.
Posted on 10/17/18 at 11:09 am to NewbombII
Pretty sure they didn't mention anything about the new manager must have coached a minimum number of MLS matches.
Posted on 10/17/18 at 12:50 pm to pvilleguru
quote:
Pretty sure they didn't mention anything about the new manager must have coached a minimum number of MLS matches.
We have to agree to disagree for now....
Posted on 10/17/18 at 12:59 pm to NewbombII
This isn't a matter of opinion. Either they said it or they didn't.
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:41 pm to pvilleguru
Twellman did say that at half, or something similar. I sipped too much weed and don’t remember the specifics, but he was talking about the job and coaches with at least 150 mls games.
If it ends up being berhalter I’ll probably just shoot myself.
If it ends up being berhalter I’ll probably just shoot myself.
Posted on 10/17/18 at 2:30 pm to NewbombII
quote:
Less than 150 MLS games coached need not apply.
Sorry Pep, frick off.
Posted on 10/17/18 at 4:11 pm to theOG
Posted on 10/17/18 at 4:21 pm to NewbombII
quote:
Less than 150 MLS games coached need not apply.
Ernie Stewart needs to clear this up. Not that there arent good coaches in the MLS, but the best coaches in the world arent in the MLS.
Posted on 10/17/18 at 4:47 pm to kengel2
i just assumed that was part of the criteria for MLS coaches they were possibly looking at? Surely he's not excluding every other coach in the world that hasn't coached in the mls?!?! ....right?.....right???
Posted on 10/17/18 at 4:47 pm to PhilipMarlowe
quote:
Surely he's not excluding every other coach in the world that hasn't coached in the mls?!?! ....right?.....right???
Right.
Earnie has been fairly successful at all of his stops. He knows what he's doing.
He may end up hiring an MLS manager, but it won't be because he was only looking at MLS managers and he won't have some arbitrary 150 game minimum requirement.
This post was edited on 10/17/18 at 4:56 pm
Posted on 10/17/18 at 5:00 pm to pvilleguru
I thought they were just using that graphic last night to illustrate how much experience the potential American MLS candidates had.
Posted on 10/17/18 at 5:09 pm to BCLA
That's exactly what they were doing.
Posted on 10/17/18 at 5:39 pm to NewbombII
If they hire an MLS manager, we should riot.
Please explain why we’ve waited this long to, in that case, hire someone we could have hired a year ago?
Please explain why we’ve waited this long to, in that case, hire someone we could have hired a year ago?
Posted on 10/17/18 at 6:13 pm to TN Bhoy
I guess I'll explain it yet again...
If your entire organizational pyramid is vacant, you don't hire the guy at the bottom first. You start at the top and work your way down.
If your entire organizational pyramid is vacant, you don't hire the guy at the bottom first. You start at the top and work your way down.
This post was edited on 10/17/18 at 6:14 pm
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News