Started By
Message

re: Is soccer in the US close to surpassing hockey as the 4th sport?

Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:26 pm to
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
21120 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

We get that you follow soccer, and love hockey.

No big deal. But, you´re mighty, mighty defensive about hockey. Tremendously so.

The numbers you threw up were weak in comparison to the US WC first round appearances, and those numbers corresponded to the ´finalísima´ of hockey.

You´re now attacking MLS, which I get. It still is inferior to the NHL.

The question was, soccer.

As many on here have said, depending upon where you live, you´ll never see a hockey jersey in the street on someone. Even in hockey country, you´ll see a soccer jersey. Mind you, the US national side, or a major European club (the US national side, 90 plus percent of the time).

Hockey´s not a US game anyway, so I don´t get the vehemence with which you defend it.

You refer to numbers. Pull them out. I´m sure you´re referring to some absolute numbers, and regional, when applicable.

The demographic breakdown of hockey fandom is certainly top heavy in an older age group and certain regions of the US, and many hispanic regions probably are soccer across the board, irrespective of the age group.

The important demographic sampling is middle class and upper middle class´(both are specimens suffering an economic holocaust of course), across the board.

Get these numbers. I know you´d be shocked.

Again, seriously IDGAF, but you were one of two who went on and on about ´The Miracle on Ice´, and how that great achievement is multifold superior to a potential WC won by the US. Your flippancy and selective facts were very adolescent, and when I properly dismounted them, you and your friend reverted to ´soccer fig´ and ´sense of superiority´type comments.

Were the WC won by the US in ´Miracle on Ice´ times, it would have been comparable, but only because it was Cold War time still. No Cold War, the WC win wins, hands down.

Again, keep on with the MLS prism, that´ll let you properly ´weasel out´.


Perfectly said.
Posted by kilo
No block, no rock
Member since Oct 2011
30531 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

Soccer has the potential to be bigger, but hockey is bigger as of now. Hockey's fanbase seems regionalized while soccer can grow anywhere.


There is no question the potential for soccer is HUGE as far as growth. In 50 years hockey will be long gone in the rear view mirror.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
72502 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:27 pm to
Boom
Posted by thesoccerfanjax
Member since Nov 2013
6128 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:28 pm to
I don't live in the South. I live in Florida. Most people here transplanted from somewhere up north.
Posted by kilo
No block, no rock
Member since Oct 2011
30531 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

Boom


There was not hard numbers or citations in that wall of text. I respect the opinion, which is all that it was, but he was kind of an arse which goes back to the whole defensive thing that plagues many soccer fans.

Its cool, I knew trying to have an honest dialogue about this subject here was gonna be tough.

Im not here to make enemies. If folks want to research this topic on their own the numbers are there.

Im out of this conversation. Have a nice evening.
This post was edited on 7/6/14 at 8:33 pm
Posted by iliveinabox
in a box
Member since Aug 2011
24146 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

Dandy Lion
good lord, kilt Em.
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36762 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:33 pm to
Interesting perspective depending on where you're from. Up here in the north, hockey >>>>>>>>>>> soccer. Down south, I'm sure it's different.

ETA: NHL Stanley Cup Final Game 5 this year averaged 6 million viewers. MLS Cup was around 500,000. Champions League Final was just under 2 million. Just for some perspective.
This post was edited on 7/6/14 at 8:35 pm
Posted by tiggah1981
Winterfell
Member since Aug 2007
18411 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:34 pm to
It's got to beat the wNBA first
Posted by kilo
No block, no rock
Member since Oct 2011
30531 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

Again, seriously IDGAF, but you were one of two who went on and on about ´The Miracle on Ice´, and how that great achievement is multifold superior to a potential WC won by the US. Your flippancy and selective facts were very adolescent, and when I properly dismounted them, you and your friend reverted to ´soccer fig´ and ´sense of superiority´type comments.


frick you man. Provide a link or you can frick right off. Thats complete bullshite. I didnt do any such thing. "Soccer fig" really man? frick you.
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
21120 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

nteresting perspective depending on where you're from. Up here in the north, hockey >>>>>>>>>>> soccer. Down south, I'm sure it's different.

ETA: NHL Stanley Cup Final Game 5 this year averaged 6 million viewers. MLS Cup was around 500,000. Champions League Final was just under 2 million. Just for some perspective.



How do the USA games in the World Cup compare? Feel free to compare it to USA hockey at the Olympics.
This post was edited on 7/6/14 at 8:38 pm
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
72502 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:38 pm to
Dude you were the one telling another guy he was being obtuse simply for asking you a question. I live in Florida as well. Hell I live 35 mins from where the panthers play and I have yet to meet someone who would even know their record let alone support the team and I'm talking about guys in in their late 20s/early 30s. With my work, I work with primarily transplants from the NE, again I cannot recall a single mention ever of hockey by any of them. Hockey gets by on a couple of dedicated markets. In terms of youth participation, and nationwide knowledge/following it is very much a niche sport.
This post was edited on 7/6/14 at 8:40 pm
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36762 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

I think its a regional question. NY, Chicago Boston, Philly, Detroit, Nashville. Basically any city with an NHL team hockey trumps Soccer.


Yeah. Blue Jackets are WAY bigger in Columbus than the Crew (and the Jackets are also WAY smaller than Ohio State football, not surprisingly).
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36762 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:41 pm to
quote:


How do the USA games in the World Cup compare? Feel free to compare it to USA hockey at the Olympics.


The USA WC games averaged less viewers than Bolt's 100-meter run in track. I guess track's more popular than soccer. Events like the World Cup and Olympics transcend sports and don't portray accurately how popular a sport is.
Posted by kilo
No block, no rock
Member since Oct 2011
30531 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

Dude you were the one telling another guy he was being obtuse simply for asking you a question. I live in Florida as well. He'll I live 35 mins from where the panthers play and I have yet to meet someone who would even know their record let alone support the team and I'm talking about guys in in their late 20s/early 30s. With my work, I work with primarily transplants from the NE, again I cannot recall a single mention ever of hockey by any of them. Hockey gets by on a couple of dedicated markets. In terms of youth participation, and nationwide knowledge/following it is very much a niche sport.


It is a niche sport. So is soccer st this point in the sporting landscape. Soccer has the much greater potential and I think it will realize that, maybe no as soon as others think, but it will get there non the less.

The question asking where "so called hockey fans" was obtuse. They are there in the place one would expect to find them.
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
21120 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

Yeah. Blue Jackets are WAY bigger in Columbus than the Crew (and the Jackets are also WAY smaller than Ohio State football, not surprisingly).



Definitely. But that doesn't make them big (I know you weren't saying that).
This post was edited on 7/6/14 at 8:44 pm
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
21120 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

The USA WC games averaged less viewers than Bolt's 100-meter run in track.


In the United States?
Posted by thesoccerfanjax
Member since Nov 2013
6128 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:45 pm to
Soccer isn't a niche sport. It's way smaller than the big three for sure, but it isn't by definition niche. If it is, how would you define this particular "niche"?

Hockey is niche. It's extremely regional, and you basically can't play at any level unless you're well off. It's almost exclusively a sport for rich white people living in the north.
This post was edited on 7/6/14 at 8:47 pm
Posted by kilo
No block, no rock
Member since Oct 2011
30531 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

Soccer isn't a niche sport. It's way smaller than the big three for sure, but it isn't by definition niche. If it is, how would you define this particular "niche"?


Sure it is. Soccer has also been a middle class and up endeavor with the pay to play model in the youth structure. They are not playing soccer in the urban cores either.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
40042 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

Soccer isn't a niche sport.


Ehhh...we might be seeing it growing out of a niche sport right now, but for most of its history in the United States it was the definition of a niche sport. Played by a small group of people. Youth participation increased greatly from the 1990's onward, so that soccer was the fastest growing sport. But good attendance figures, which are rather recent, and good television figures for a WC game, all point to it growing out of its niche status.
Posted by thesoccerfanjax
Member since Nov 2013
6128 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

Sure it is. Soccer has also been a middle class and up endeavor with the pay to play model in the youth structure. They are not playing soccer in the urban cores either.


This statement would be true 10, 15, 20 years ago. It's not anymore.

Soccer is in no way exclusionary at the most basic levels. You basically CAN'T play hockey unless you pay for time on the ice. That's the definition of niche.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram