Started By
Message

re: If the USA hosted the World Cup, where would games be played?

Posted on 6/17/14 at 9:37 am to
Posted by ColoradoAg03
Denver, CO
Member since Oct 2012
6690 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 9:37 am to
quote:

The other three no chance. Tourist don't want to go those places.


Exactly. Nobody outside of the US really knows or cares what historical and cultural value those big college stadiums have in our country. To them they would be nothing more than big arse dumps of stadiums that are well outdated.

The Rose Bowl is the only one that would have a chance again.
This post was edited on 6/17/14 at 9:39 am
Posted by TheRookbird
Member since Aug 2013
1322 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Average temps in June get deep in the 100's



It was 117 in the capital of Qatar when the WC started in Brazil.
Posted by Tiger in NY
Neptune Beach, FL
Member since Sep 2003
31666 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 9:52 am to
50,000 showed up at Everbank last week and Khan owns a soccer team (Fulham FC). With the renovations (largest jumbotron and a bunch of pools and plaza areas), I think Jacksonville would definitely see some games.
This post was edited on 6/17/14 at 9:59 am
Posted by GeauxTigers2020
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 10:02 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/14/25 at 1:05 pm
Posted by etm512
Mandeville, LA
Member since Aug 2005
21061 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 10:42 am to
Just curious if anyone knows - when we hosted did we keep the groups somewhat regional or did we make teams travel cross country from like Seattle to Miami like it seems we have to do in Brazil?
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram