Started By
Message

re: AVB officially Spurs Manager

Posted on 7/3/12 at 1:02 pm to
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28621 posts
Posted on 7/3/12 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

If you are a THFC player, how can you get behind a guy that failed miserably at Chelsea.


Yea well I can't get behind this either. We have different definitions of the word "fail."

cue the Chelsea CL onslaught
Posted by LSU Red24
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2007
4769 posts
Posted on 7/3/12 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

I just can't see it. If you are a THFC player, how can you get behind a guy that failed miserably at Chelsea. Who knows if any of them leave? I think he will eventually be a good manager, but I just can't imagine him being very successful in the immediate future.


It's just the style of ball that makes me think he'll be successful. I know you know your soccer and you know that Spurs and Chelsea don't play the same style.

AVB's style fits in nicely with the way Spurs already play. You can't run what AVB wanted to run with guys like Lampard, Mereiles, Drogba, Mikel, Malouda, etc. Plus, like mentioned, they're going to give him oodles of money to throw down wherever he sees fit.

eta: But yes, if you're referring to the off-the-pitch factor in terms of respect for AVB and winning the players over...I'm also skeptical
This post was edited on 7/3/12 at 1:05 pm
Posted by Bho
Lexington
Member since Dec 2007
24814 posts
Posted on 7/3/12 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

AVB's style fits in nicely with the way Spurs already play


I agree. My problem with AVB was and always will be that he tried to run "his" style with players not suited. I know I've talked about the comparison to Coach Cal at UK. When Cal got there, he had to adjust to the players, then started getting his type in there and what happened. 2 FF and a NC. He just seems to be stuck in his ways with no hint at adapting. I would expect that from Jose, but AVB needs to earn his stripes before blocking out change.
Posted by Meursault
Member since Sep 2003
25262 posts
Posted on 7/3/12 at 1:13 pm to
A fair point. I don't think anyone will disagree that the risk is still there. I think Spurs are in a good position (better than Chelsea was in regards to players, egos, etc) to take this risk, with the assumption that maybe AVB has learned something from his time at Chelsea. He enforcing his "style" wouldn't be my biggest worry. The possibility that he might be psychologically damaged from the London media/expectations etc would worry me. When he was rumored to be the next guy at Liverpool I was on board, but the question of whether he can cope with the media had me a little concerned.
Posted by Jumbeauxlaya
LSU
Member since Jan 2011
18083 posts
Posted on 7/3/12 at 1:15 pm to
quote:


That won a UCL trophy after they got rid of his sorry arse.


That style of play will NOT work in league play.

Unless of course you want to settle for a record that looks something like 4-30-4 for a grand total of 42 points.
Posted by GeauxColonels
Tottenham Fan | LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2009
25606 posts
Posted on 7/3/12 at 1:20 pm to
I'm cautiously optimistic. I'm thinking that his hiring may help to retain some players that might have otherwise wanted to go elsewhere. But, regardless of the coach, Spurs need definite upgrades at several positions. If that doesn't happen, I'm doubtful Spurs can finish higher than 4th or even 5th.
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28621 posts
Posted on 7/3/12 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

That style of play will NOT work in league play.



And his record in the league reflected that.

After AVB left, Chelsea scored less goals per game, had more scored on them per game, got less points per game and finished in a lower place than when he was fired (talking about league play).

He struggled with the players, but this ridiculous notion that he "failed" is absurd.

And I know this is a tough subject to talk about, but Chelsea would be in a better position with AVB moving forward than with RDM IMO. Who knows what would have happened in the CL, but RDM has been given a war chest that AVB would have thrived with. Of course Chelsea will probably get Pep next year and then this whole argument will be null and void.
This post was edited on 7/3/12 at 1:25 pm
Posted by Bho
Lexington
Member since Dec 2007
24814 posts
Posted on 7/3/12 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

I'm doubtful Spurs can finish higher than 4th or even 5th.


This is what would bother me. If you don't qualify for CL again, it will continue to be difficult to bring in the top talent to compete for trophies. So unless the academy is full of superstars, I fear THFC may be in trouble.
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 7/3/12 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

He struggled with the players, but this ridiculous notion that he "failed" is absurd.

But...but...Champions League...
Posted by Bho
Lexington
Member since Dec 2007
24814 posts
Posted on 7/3/12 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

After AVB left, Chelsea scored less goals per game, had more scored on them per game, got less points per game and finished in a lower place than when he was fired (talking about league play).



The problem here is we were playing in the FA Cup and CL along with league play. We sacrificed the league and put all of our eggs in winning the CL. It worked. I agree that RDM may not be the best to lead us, but it is what it is. Thinking that RDM will just wake up and start winning games is absurd IMO.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126858 posts
Posted on 7/3/12 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

He'll succeed at Tottenham (just like he would have at CFC). He's reportedly been given £70M and he is targeting some big name players. Tottenham are in a great position, IMO.


quality post

Posted by joey barton
Member since Feb 2011
11468 posts
Posted on 7/3/12 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

And I know this is a tough subject to talk about, but Chelsea would be in a better position with AVB moving forward than with RDM IMO


By all accounts, Roman really liked AVB and would probably agree

Didn't really have much of a choice, though

I love how the Daniel Sturridge to Spurs rumors have already started
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28621 posts
Posted on 7/3/12 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

By all accounts, Roman really liked AVB and would probably agree

Didn't really have much of a choice, though

I love how the Daniel Sturridge to Spurs rumors have already started


Yep. It was a tough position. He didn't win the players and that doomed him.

I think they have a good shot at Sturridge. Lots of rumors that Chelsea are looking to offload him and he had a good relationship with AVB.
Posted by RandySavage
9 Time Natty Winner
Member since May 2012
35833 posts
Posted on 7/3/12 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

But...but...Champions League...


Ha, right because winning the Champions League is just a small matter. Ridiculous of Chelsea fans to point that.

More like, But...but... he won the Portugese league and the NIT of soccer. The fact this guy started Meireles almost every game and dropped Ashley Cole for Jose Boswinga in a CL knockout game shows how truly incompetent he can be.
This post was edited on 7/3/12 at 1:47 pm
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 7/3/12 at 1:51 pm to
My point was that Chelsea did win the CL, but it wasn't like they got loads better in league play. They might have put all their eggs in one basket by going CL or Nothing, but it wasn't like Chelsea became world-beaters post-AVB. That's why I think he's still a good a manager.

He didn't get a fair chance at Chelsea. Didn't have the support of the vets, didn't have time to get the club to adopt to his style.
Posted by RandySavage
9 Time Natty Winner
Member since May 2012
35833 posts
Posted on 7/3/12 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

He didn't get a fair chance at Chelsea. Didn't have the support of the vets, didn't have time to get the club to adopt to his style.


All of that was mainly his fault though is the point some people are missing. He mismanaged the team badly and lost the respect and support of the players. Some of it is on them but most of it is on the manager.
Posted by GeauxColonels
Tottenham Fan | LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2009
25606 posts
Posted on 7/3/12 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

All of that was mainly his fault though is the point some people are missing. He mismanaged the team badly and lost the respect and support of the players. Some of it is on them but most of it is on the manager.

Well, here's hoping he's learned his lesson.
:fingerscrossed:
Posted by Bho
Lexington
Member since Dec 2007
24814 posts
Posted on 7/3/12 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

Didn't have the support of the vets,


Not an easy task when they are all the same age or older. Again, unless you really didn't pay attention, the attitude of the team got MUCH better when he was gone. They were happy.......and happy wins.
Posted by BobLoblaw
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2011
2324 posts
Posted on 7/3/12 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

Not an easy task when they are all the same age or older. Again, unless you really didn't pay attention, the attitude of the team got MUCH better when he was gone. They were happy.......and happy wins.


His biggest mistake was keeping all the vets. It was predictable, you can't tell the (arguably) 3 best players in Chelsea history that they were all going to play second fiddle in a new system that does not fit them. Had he kept say, terry, and sold lamps and drogba I think he very well might have panned out there.

Also, I think the players were primarily motivated to prove that he was wrong (rather than any sort of tactical master stroke by RDM) after he got the sack. I can certainly understand that players like Lampard and Terry were unhappy but I think they showed extremely poor leadership and served to only divide the dressing room. Of course I'm of the opinion that any dressing room with cashley, terry and drogba is going to have problems unless a manager who claims a ton of respect is in place (Mourinho, ancelotti)
Posted by RandySavage
9 Time Natty Winner
Member since May 2012
35833 posts
Posted on 7/3/12 at 7:01 pm to
His problem was he was sitting those guys, especially Lampard, and playing guys like Meireles who was largely awful for Chelsea. Of course Lamps is going to be pissed as well he should be. Yes, Lamps is not the player he was 3-4 years ago but he showed in the CL he can still play a huge role on a team. He did more in those two games vs. Barca than Raul did all season and his effort and leadership in the CL final was vital. As for AVB the disaster in Naples was the final straw. He completely botched everything about that trip and showed he was not ready for the big time.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram