- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
A shot across the bow....NASL accuses MLS of anti-trust practices
Posted on 9/2/15 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 9/2/15 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 9/2/15 at 1:30 pm to EastNastySwag
Maybe the NASL should pay more money, build nicer stadiums, and get better tv deals.
Posted on 9/2/15 at 1:37 pm to itawambadog
Or not get their asses handed to them by USL Pro teams in US Open Cup.
Posted on 9/2/15 at 1:53 pm to EastNastySwag
quote:
"Doubling the population criteria now is an anti-competitive bait and switch, with the purpose of entrenching MLS's monopoly position at the very time when the NASL is threatening to become a significant competitor," NASL attorney Jeffrey Kessler wrote in a letter to U.S. Soccer president Sunil Gulati, according to the reports.
Posted on 9/2/15 at 1:55 pm to GeauxColonels
I could be wrong but I read somewhere that, going by the new population criteria many epl clubs would not exist, including the manchester clubs.
i don't know if that's true or not though.
i don't know if that's true or not though.
Posted on 9/2/15 at 2:09 pm to PTBob
London and Birmingham are the only two cities in the UK with a municipal population over one million. I'm sure Manchester and Glasgow have around a million in their metropolitan population.
Hell Burnley only has a population of 73k people.
Hell Burnley only has a population of 73k people.
Posted on 9/2/15 at 3:47 pm to PTBob
quote:
I could be wrong but I read somewhere that, going by the new population criteria many epl clubs would not exist, including the manchester clubs.
i don't know if that's true or not though.
Comparing England with the US just doesn't work here though.
Posted on 9/2/15 at 4:27 pm to EastNastySwag
Those new rules are terrible.
Posted on 9/2/15 at 5:08 pm to GeauxColonels
quote:
Comparing England with the US just doesn't work here though.
Comparing any of the major players in soccer to the US doesn't work when it comes to club league structure.
Posted on 9/2/15 at 5:22 pm to GeauxColonels
the new rules are bogus is what i'm getting at. and the nasl has a pretty good argument.
Posted on 9/2/15 at 5:59 pm to thenry712
quote:
London and Birmingham are the only two cities in the UK with a municipal population over one million. I
It's pathetic that the best football Birmingham can offer is Aston Villa.
As far as the NASL, it's all about FC Edmonton.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 1:28 am to GeauxColonels
quote:
Comparing England with the US just doesn't work here though.
yea but those new rules are kind of horseshite though.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 8:57 am to Dr RC
MLS outgrew the old rules. The NASL should be more worried about the USL passing them up and less worried about something that wasn't going to happen anyway.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 10:10 am to Dr RC
quote:
yea but those new rules are kind of horseshite though.
Meh, I don't think so. I think those kind of guidelines aren't too far fetched to be the top level soccer league in the US.
Popular
Back to top
3









