Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

A shot across the bow....NASL accuses MLS of anti-trust practices

Posted on 9/2/15 at 1:17 pm
Posted by EastNastySwag
Member since Dec 2014
5978 posts
Posted on 9/2/15 at 1:17 pm
NASL news

All the pro/rel fanatics are fapping no doubt.
Posted by itawambadog
America, F Yeah!
Member since Nov 2007
21266 posts
Posted on 9/2/15 at 1:30 pm to
Maybe the NASL should pay more money, build nicer stadiums, and get better tv deals.
Posted by EastNastySwag
Member since Dec 2014
5978 posts
Posted on 9/2/15 at 1:37 pm to
Or not get their asses handed to them by USL Pro teams in US Open Cup.
Posted by GeauxColonels
Tottenham Fan | LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2009
25606 posts
Posted on 9/2/15 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

"Doubling the population criteria now is an anti-competitive bait and switch, with the purpose of entrenching MLS's monopoly position at the very time when the NASL is threatening to become a significant competitor," NASL attorney Jeffrey Kessler wrote in a letter to U.S. Soccer president Sunil Gulati, according to the reports.
Posted by PTBob
Member since Nov 2010
7105 posts
Posted on 9/2/15 at 1:55 pm to
I could be wrong but I read somewhere that, going by the new population criteria many epl clubs would not exist, including the manchester clubs.

i don't know if that's true or not though.
Posted by thenry712
Zasullia, Ukraine
Member since Nov 2008
15795 posts
Posted on 9/2/15 at 2:09 pm to
London and Birmingham are the only two cities in the UK with a municipal population over one million. I'm sure Manchester and Glasgow have around a million in their metropolitan population.

Hell Burnley only has a population of 73k people.
Posted by GeauxColonels
Tottenham Fan | LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2009
25606 posts
Posted on 9/2/15 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

I could be wrong but I read somewhere that, going by the new population criteria many epl clubs would not exist, including the manchester clubs.

i don't know if that's true or not though.

Comparing England with the US just doesn't work here though.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 9/2/15 at 4:27 pm to
Those new rules are terrible.
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
30308 posts
Posted on 9/2/15 at 5:08 pm to
quote:

Comparing England with the US just doesn't work here though.


Comparing any of the major players in soccer to the US doesn't work when it comes to club league structure.
Posted by PTBob
Member since Nov 2010
7105 posts
Posted on 9/2/15 at 5:22 pm to
the new rules are bogus is what i'm getting at. and the nasl has a pretty good argument.
Posted by Mr Personality
Bangkok
Member since Mar 2014
27364 posts
Posted on 9/2/15 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

London and Birmingham are the only two cities in the UK with a municipal population over one million. I


It's pathetic that the best football Birmingham can offer is Aston Villa.

As far as the NASL, it's all about FC Edmonton.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61617 posts
Posted on 9/3/15 at 1:28 am to
quote:

Comparing England with the US just doesn't work here though.


yea but those new rules are kind of horseshite though.

Posted by arkyhawk
SWMO
Member since Jan 2013
8116 posts
Posted on 9/3/15 at 8:57 am to
MLS outgrew the old rules. The NASL should be more worried about the USL passing them up and less worried about something that wasn't going to happen anyway.
Posted by GeauxColonels
Tottenham Fan | LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2009
25606 posts
Posted on 9/3/15 at 10:10 am to
quote:

yea but those new rules are kind of horseshite though.


Meh, I don't think so. I think those kind of guidelines aren't too far fetched to be the top level soccer league in the US.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram