- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/26/26 at 3:58 pm to Powerman
quote:
He was enough of anything for AIPAC to back up the Brinks truck to remove him from a congressional seat.
Or, you know, perhaps the voters of Kentucky’s 4th Congressional District were simply dissatisfied with the representation he was providing.
You know, a congressman’s first duty IS to take care of his district.
This post was edited on 8/26/26 at 3:59 pm
Posted on 8/26/26 at 3:59 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
The point sailed waaaaay over your head.
They didn't spend that much money on nobody as much as you want to wish cast it.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 3:59 pm to DeBoar
Lulz.... so a massie supporter submitted the poll and like the Candace won poll... the Islamabod and CCP bot masshole bots made Massie winning at 47.8%.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 4:00 pm to Godfather1
quote:
Or, you know, perhaps the voters of Kentucky’s 4th Congressional District were simply dissatisfied with the representation he was providing.
You know, a congressman’s first duty IS to take care of his district.
His district is Israel and the Epstein clients?
Because that is who he wasn't serving and why the money was spent getting him out.
What do you believe he did that wasn't serving his district?
Posted on 8/26/26 at 4:02 pm to Boom33
quote:
What do you believe he did that wasn't serving his district?
Oh, I don’t know.
I guess the fact that his constituents (you know, the people who actually vote) fired his arse after 14 years was my first clue.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 4:03 pm to DeBoar
I mean, now that he's brought it up...
Posted on 8/26/26 at 4:14 pm to Boom33
quote:
They didn't spend that much money on nobody as much as you want to wish cast it.
Again. Your reading comprehension is failing you. Nobody is disputing money was spent. The point that sailed over your head is that the constituents in his district were tired of him not accomplishing anything. Thus him now being a non-entity.
This post was edited on 8/26/26 at 4:15 pm
Posted on 8/26/26 at 4:20 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
the constituents in his district were tired of him not accomplishing anything. Thus him now being a non-entity.
It’s amazing to me the number of people who simply refuse to understand or acknowledge this simple fact.
Constituencies who are satisfied with the representation their congressman is providing, generally don’t fire 14 year incumbents. Especially by the margin by which Massie got voted out.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 4:23 pm to Godfather1
quote:
Indirect Trump Referendum: Post-election assessments indicated that many voters didn't necessarily vote for Gallrein as an individual, but rather used their vote as an indirect validation of Trump
quote:
The Trump Endorsement: Gallrein, a former Navy SEAL, secured an early and enthusiastic endorsement from Donald Trump. Trump actively campaigned against Massie on social media and at rallies, framing the race as a loyalty test.
Purity tests are bad.
quote:
Record-Breaking Campaign Spending: The race became the most expensive U.S. House primary in history. A multi-million dollar ad blitz funded by pro-Trump super PACs heavily blanketed the district, systematically painting Massie as a roadblock to the "America First" agenda.
This post was edited on 8/26/26 at 4:27 pm
Posted on 8/26/26 at 4:25 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Again. Your reading comprehension is failing you. Nobody is disputing money was spent. The point that sailed over your head is that the constituents in his district were tired of him not accomplishing anything. Thus him now being a non-entity.
Once again, if that were the case there is no need to spend all the money.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 4:27 pm to Boom33
quote:
Once again, if that were the case there is no need to spend all the money.
I can’t understand it for you. 
Posted on 8/26/26 at 4:33 pm to DeBoar
When were you in the island bro?
Posted on 8/26/26 at 4:36 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
I can’t understand it for you.
I can't put your cart behind your horse either.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 4:37 pm to Godfather1
quote:
Constituencies who are satisfied with the representation their congressman is providing, generally don’t fire 14 year incumbents. Especially by the margin by which Massie got voted out.
You give constituents way too much credit. Most are stupid and misinformed making decisions based on what they see on Fox News and social media.
See Darline in SC as proof.
This post was edited on 8/26/26 at 4:38 pm
Posted on 8/26/26 at 4:41 pm to Boom33
quote:
I can't put your cart behind your horse either.
you don’t even know what you’re arguing do you?Posted on 8/26/26 at 4:48 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
you don’t even know what you’re arguing do you?
You claimed:
quote:
Long winded way of saying he couldn’t win a house seat. As I said. Non-entity.
Once again, if he was a non-entity they don't need to spend a bunch of money getting him out of office.
Furthermore, I wouldn't constantly see threads like this one made about him either.
You are just wish casting.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 6:00 pm to Boom33
quote:
Once again, if he was a non-entity they don't need to spend a bunch of money getting him out of office.
Good lord. He is currently a non-entity. Not when he was in office. When he was in office he was just a nuisance that didn’t accomplish anything. Now he is a non-entity. (Yes I’m aware his term isn’t officially over). I shouldn’t have to explain this to you. You have a double digit iq.
quote:
Furthermore, I wouldn't constantly see threads like this one made about him either. You are just wish casting.
You’re an imbecile throwing out trite cliches and don’t even know what they mean.
This post was edited on 8/26/26 at 6:01 pm
Posted on 8/26/26 at 6:19 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Good lord. He is currently a non-entity. Not when he was in office. When he was in office he was just a nuisance that didn’t accomplish anything. Now he is a non-entity. (Yes I’m aware his term isn’t officially over). I shouldn’t have to explain this to you. You have a double digit iq.
You’re an imbecile throwing out trite cliches and don’t even know what they mean.
At some point you may start to realize if he was a non-entity you wouldn't be posting about him making sure everyone else knows.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 6:25 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
He is currently a non-entity.
Four page thread says many here are very much still obsessed with his every action. If you can explain how that equates to “non-entity” I’d like to read it.
If not for this board I wouldn’t think about him at all.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News